Re: McCain asked about PNAC and 9/11 at town hall

On Jul 12, 2:55=A0pm, "zasochimti" <zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Yes "we" do. The fact that there hasn't been a criminal investigation
int=
o the events of
> 9/11 speaks for itself, whacko "debunker".
>
> Whether "we know who did it" or not, a criminal investigation had to be
c=
onducted.
> And here you are, acting like a silly ***** because you don't like that
f=
act, whacko "debunker".

Now here's a thought. Who exactly would conduct this "criminal
investigation?" The government? The exact same government that you
claim is actually BEHIND the destruction of the Towers and WTC7?

So if this investigation, after spending millions of taxpayer dollars,
came to the conclusion that you were full of hot air and there IS no
grounds for your theories, would you sit back and accept the verdict
or would you start screaming that the investigation was tainted and
demand ANOTHER investigation to determine why the first investigation
didn't reach the conclusions you expected them to?