Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman Robert

Al Dykes wrote:
> In article <487f9b05$0$2929$ec3e2dad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Day Brown  <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Al Dykes wrote:
>>
>>> A long list deleted and irrelevant to the fact that nobody with
>>> relevant expertise says that anything but 4 hijacked commercial jets
>>> caused all the destruction on 9/11.  Anyone that claims otherwise
>>> refuses to make their case in front of any group with relevant
>>> expertise.
>> Al, can you explain why we must accept your definition of "relevant 
>> expertise"? I have seen presentations by architects, engineers, and 

> Prof.  Jones has to speak to and answer questions from chemical
> metallurgists and demolition experts. Richard Gage speaks to
> structural engineers and demolition experts.  The "pilots for truth"
> speak with people that know aviation.  The IT guy that claims a power
> down at WTC talks to people like me that ran floor-sized IT operations
> and participated on construction projects in big Manhattan buildings.
> 
> This doesn't seem like rocket science.  Speaking to crowds of ignorant
> people doesn't clarify anything.
Jones is a demagogue; I understand that. I've seen many others besides 
him. Debunkers always cite Jones, he's an easy jackass strawman. I've 
seen others who didnt claim the divine revelations Jones does, who 
merely point out certain facts from the video and other sources we have 
to forgo the dramatic career, but make perfectly clear the official 
re****t is deceptive and inadequate.

You still have not defined what "relevant expertise" is. Merely 
debunking Jones is not an adequate definition. I have said, and this 
dont have jack schitt to do with Jones, that Lee Hamilton of the 911 
commission said they were lied to. So, I conclude I do not know how 
reliable the official re****t is.

If I did not understand how group think works, I'd wonder why a new 
official investigation has not been established. But since I do, I can 
see that 911 will remain under the rug until there is economic panic, 
and they need scapegoats. Altho, and we've started to see this, as 
people retire, they come out from under the group think of the military 
and bureaucracy, out of academia and office, and have time to think 
about what they witnessed. And some of them have begun to re****t other 
details which do not fit the official re****ts.