Re: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Letter to Congressman Robert

Day Brown wrote:
> Vandar wrote:
> 
>> Day Brown wrote:
>>
>>> While lotsa twoofers have theories they want to defend, I'm not one 
>>> of them. And the debunkers think they know because they believe the 
>>> official 911 re****t. I'm not one of them either.
>>
>>
>> What official re****t?
> 
> Why dont you know about the re****t published by the 911 commission?

I do know about it. Why don't you know what the 9/11 Commission concluded?

>>> All I've been saying that the data and video I have seen are not 
>>> consistent with the official re****t. I read that Hamilton admits the 
>>> 911 commission was lied to. I dont see any attempt to determine what 
>>> those lies were, or who committed perjury. The fact that nothing has 
>>> been done to clarify this reeks of some kind of cover up.
>>
>>
>> Who said anything about perjury?
> 
> Why dont you know the definition of perjury is to lie under oath, in
> this case to the 911 commission?

I know what the definition of perjury. Why don't you know that isn't 
what Kean & Hamilton accused the officials of?
They were accused of obstruction, not perjury. What would have happened 
if those officials were investigated and found to have committed 
obstruction?... Put on trial? Nope. Fined? Nope. Imprisoned? Nope. Out 
of a job? Nope. Sanctions? Yup.

> Sure you are not a Turing machine? I have a hard time imagining the 
> mental state that would produce your questions.

What produced these questions is an awareness that you don't seem very 
well informed on matters related to 9/11.