Re: McCain asked about PNAC and 9/11 at town hall

"Disneygeek" <edrhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:56c2ee63-3a09-45ec-b92e-1d9be714f360@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jul 12, 2:59 pm, "zasochimti" <zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Vandar" <vanda...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:dz4ek.42331$fX5.20218@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > zasochimti wrote:
> >> Sure, whacko Vandar, sure. But you do know how to keep your mouth
shut, right?
>
> > Know how? Yes. Have to? Not at all.
>
> But you do keep your mouth shut, whacko Vandar. That's why you're a
"debunker".

>Did you ever think that maybe he's a debunker simply because he
>doesn't believe your theories?

No. People like Vandar do not tell lies for 7 years "just" because they
"disagree".
And you're a ****ing fool (but I think you're just like him, stupid
"debunker") if
you believe Vandar "merely disagrees".

>He doesn't believe in "silent" explosives,

Neither do I, but WTC1 and WTC did NOT fall due to "structural collapse".

But you seem to parrot that ****, day in and day out. I wonder why.

or in operatives that are
>able to plant said silent explosives in walls of occupied offices.

Neither do I, but WTC1 and WTC2 did not fall down because of "structural
damage"
nor were they blwon into finest of dusts with conventional explosives,
dumbass.

But you seem to parrot that ****, day in and day out. I wonder why.

Nor
>in conspiracy theories that involve misrepresenting collapse times,

Well then, the stage is yours.

A) How long did it take WTC1 to collapse?
B) How long did it take WTC2 to collapse?
C) How long did it take WTC7 to collapse?

Let's see, whacko "debunker".

>ignoring the amount of damage WTC7 sustained AND ignoring sworn
>testimony about WTC7 being unstable ("tilting and bulging" were the
>exact words used) for up to THREE HOURS before the final collapse.

While Larry Silverstein said "pull it", "meaning pull them out", when all
the rescue
personell has been pulled out of WTC7 way back around 12 o'clock.

Care to explain, whacko "debunker"?

>(Not to mention the absurd idea that an owner of a building would be
>formulating plans to demolish a building with the head of the Fire
>Department!)

Yeah, I mean, "that would never happen". So never did Hitler, nor Charles
Manson, nor did CIA had anything to do with Contras, nor AlQaeda...

Are you seriously THAT dumb, "disneygeek", that you expect people to
fall for that **** you keep spewing out?

If you honestly believe that people will believe you, well then you need a
reality check.

>He doesn't believe your interpretation of the events, nothing more
>sinister than that.

AND he also ignores certains testimonies, certain facts, certain
arguments,
certain videos, certain witnesses, certain "coincidences"...

Go away, "disneygeek". I mean, your lies are as obvious as 9/11.
And sorry, whacko "debunker", that's just the way it is. But you keep on
spewing bull****. That way, I'll feel no anger, no remorse when I'll be
kicking your ass for telling outward lies for the last 7 years. In which
as
a consquence of lies of Bush and his admin (and in the end - your lies
too)
thousands, hunderds of thousands of people have died.

And not only that. I'll save a special kick in the head for taking a giant
piss on the graves of the victims of 9/11. Taking a piss at their
families'
grievances, by talking **** about TruthMovement (which was started BY
familiy members of the victims), telling outward lies, ignoring certain
facts,
arguments, witnesses, testimonies etc.

Comprende?

Good.