"BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22efdcb88db9c44c989999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <g64upu$dci$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> zasochimti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>
>> "BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22ef40dc21dbbc1198998b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <g62isq$pcc$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > zasochimti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >>
>> >> "BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22ee8b63831ff0d498997d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > In article <g62bff$qh8$4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> > zasochimti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22ed3fbe678f2d83989962@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> > In article <g5uq5j$p0b$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> > zasochimti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "BDK" <****llkill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22ec5a2d14057c7b989950@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > In article <g5tqq7$vcj$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >> >> >> > zasochimti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> "Patrick Keenan" <test@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2r6dnb_tYche8B_VnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> >> > "VTR" <vexjorge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:O-edncBeYb8Hyx_VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> >> >> June 10, 2008 - 5:13PM
>> >> >> >> >> >> Sen. Karen Johnson's floor speech about 9/11
>> >> >> >> >> >> Provided to the Tribune
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> 9/11 Floor Speech
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> MR. PRESIDENT =3F POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS IN THE GALLERY =3F and then I
WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT MY REMARKS OF
>> >> >> >> >> >> MORE THAN 200 WORDS BE ENTERED INTO THE JOURNAL.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Members -- I would like to introduce a very special
guest who has been joined today by several
>> >> >> >> >> >> of his closest friends. Up in the gallery, we have many
of the members of the Phoenix 9/11
>> >> >> >> >> >> Truth group =3F people who are asking for a new,
independent investigation of the attacks of
>> >> >> >> >> >> Sept. 11, 2001. In particular, I would like to introduce
to you a VERY courageous man named
>> >> >> >> >> >> Blair Gadsby. I=3Fm going to ask the folks with Blair to
help him to stand as I tell you a little
>> >> >> >> >> >> about him. Blair is very weak because he has been
fasting for more than two weeks to try to
>> >> >> >> >> >> bring attention to the cause of 9/11 Truth. This is the
16th day that Blair has gone without
>> >> >> >> >> >> food and spent his day outside the office of U.S.
Senator John McCain pleading with the senator
>> >> >> >> >> >> to take a look at new evidence in the 9/11 crimes. We
have one man who is sacrificing his own
>> >> >> >> >> >> personal needs and desires to stand boldly pleading for
the world to take notice, to question,
>> >> >> >> >> >> to research and not place their lives into the hands of
media sound-bites, - to think for
>> >> >> >> >> >> themselves, consciously and critically. Blair is an
educator and to me this is what the great
>> >> >> >> >> >> educators do. Thousands of people all over the country
and actually around the world have been
>> >> >> >> >> >> watching on the internet as this Hunger Strike
progresses here in Phoenix. I want Blair to know
>> >> >> >> >> >> that I am his biggest fan and that good people
everywhere admire him for his courage and
>> >> >> >> >> >> determine. Please give a warm welcome to Blair Gadsby
and the Phoenix 9/11 Truth movement. (STOP)
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
*************************************************************
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> (FLOOR SPEECH) Last month, I started speaking publicly
regarding my concerns about the attacks
>> >> >> >> >> >> of Sept. 11, 2001, which brought down the Twin Towers of
the World Trade Center, as well as
>> >> >> >> >> >> Building 7. If you=3Fve watched the media coverage since
I first began to speak out, you know how
>> >> >> >> >> >> vicious and irrational it has been toward me. The media
have worked hard to try to make it seem
>> >> >> >> >> >> silly to even question the 9/11 Commission Re****t, even
though some of its own authors have
>> >> >> >> >> >> done so, including both of the Commission Co-Chairmen
=3F Mr. Hamilton and Keane.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Actually, the 9/11 Commission Re****t represents just one
theory =3F the theory that fire and the
>> >> >> >> >> >> damage from the airplane impacts brought down the three
buildings. This theory explains none of
>> >> >> >> >> >> the features of the destruction
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Actually, it explains all of them.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> that we all witnessed that day and which we can still
observe
>> >> >> >> >> >> on hundreds of videos. It explains nothing about how in
four out of four cases, no hijacking
>> >> >> >> >> >> code was transmitted by the hijacked airliners, and in
four of four cases, no fighter jets
>> >> >> >> >> >> managed to get alongside any of the hijacked airliners.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Neither of those are "features of destuction" of the
buildings themselves. They may be features of the hijacking,
>> >> >> >> >> > but
>> >> >> >> >> > not
>> >> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> > collapses.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> The military officers who lied to
>> >> >> >> >> >> Congress about their failure to protect America
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > And who, exactly, were these military officers? Names
and ranks, please, and be clear about the nature of the
>> >> >> >> >> > lies.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > If you're going to claim that people lied, at least have
the backbone to identify them.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> would have been referred for prosecution by
>> >> >> >> >> >> some of the 9/11 Commissioners, but those Commissioners
were told that they did not have that
>> >> >> >> >> >> authority.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Which is probably true. Read the terms of the
commission to find out.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>The events of that day were a heinous crime against our
nation and our citizens,
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Yes they were, and most of those who perpetrated it died
in the event.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> and
>> >> >> >> >> >> the sense of justice that exists in each one of us
demands to know what really happened and how
>> >> >> >> >> >> all the perpetrators will be caught and punished.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > How, exactly, does the speaker propose that we catch and
punish the dead?
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> The speculation and theorizing won=3Ft end
>> >> >> >> >> >> until a thorough, transparent investigation, free of
conflicts of interest, takes place.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Among the many theories that you can find on the
Internet is one that rises above all the rest.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It is rock-solid, confirmed by hard evidence, and
sup****ted by hundreds of scholars,
>> >> >> >> >> >> architects, engineers and other professionals who have
the education, training, and expertise
>> >> >> >> >> >> to know what they=3Fre talking about. This is the theory
that explosive demolitions brought down
>> >> >> >> >> >> the Twin Towers and Building 7.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Oh, please.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > There is no such "rock-solid" evidence for controlled
demolition. It does not exist.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> But there is rock solid evidence of US gvt deliberately
obstructing the work
>> >> >> >> >> of the 9/11 Commission. From the fact that they've stalled
it's set up, to the
>> >> >> >> >> fact that Zelikow was "monitoring" the work of the 9/11
Commission and
>> >> >> >> >> "supplying" it with do***ents the White House cleared
first.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Geroge Bush is a moron. And so are you, Patrick. You
deserve each other.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> And don't you look at me. Not my fault. It's your fault.
Live with it.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > BWHAHAHAHA! You're drooling again, Sack...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Since you've replied, that means I am not.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And my reply is connected with your drooling in what way?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Drooling kooks are funny.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And again. Since you've replied twice, that means I am
neither"drooling" nor a "kook".
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > You think too much of yourself Sack. I reply BECAUSE you're a
drooling
>> >> > kook.
>> >> >
>> >> > Why can't you get that through that incredibly tiny head of yours?
>> >>
>> >> Third reply. Keep 'em coming, BDK.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Your delusions fascinate me.
>>
>> Fourth one, BDK.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You can count to four?
>
> Good for you!! Your folks must be so proud.
>
> And to think the doctors said you would never make it past three.
>
> And the next number is what Sackso****y?
And again, your constant replying prove you wrong, old fart.
|
