> (-) wrote:
>> The aircraft also has required identification numbers and
>> a U.S. flag to identify the nationality of the aircraft.
James Of Tucson <james0tucson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> So the plane does have a US flag (and no other), and is otherwise
> 100% legal.
This is about politics, right & wrong, not just what is "legal."
> What was your problem again? I really didn't follow it. Did you
> complain to FedEx for having their logo when they could have
> a US flag instead?
They made an expenditure of campaign funds to replace an
American Flag with the narcissistic "cheap thrills" of Obama's
vanity plate. Indicates other impressive indulgences quite likely
will follow, in the Obama Administration, at taxpayer expense.
FedEx already got a lot of product placement in _Cast_Away_.
> Or do you only use this argument to denounce Senator Obama?
He's a fine public speaker but a politician playing his race card.
He arrives with an extraordinary lack of experience, ideal for the
Zionazi puppet masters to lead a prison planet into Armageddon.
Used to be that we could vote for anybody we please without
being labelled as "racist."
> In any case, what is it that you say he did, that was against the
> law? I can't follow your premise, because it is not at all clear
> what your issue is.
Appears that you are applying the premise that if something
is "legal" then it must be moral, just, ethical, and correct.
Next time perhaps you can try aiming for a higher standard.
- regards
- jb
------------------------------------------------------------
Colorblind Equality: A Winning Issue for McCain?
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5211
------------------------------------------------------------
|
