Re: McCain asked about PNAC and 9/11 at town hall

On Jul 21, 10:48=A0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Government ****ll #2 wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:25:19 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > >Government ****ll #2 wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:20 +0200, "zasochimti"
<zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> >"Disneygeek" <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:20436e91-2=
85b-47e3-a208-d9bd9939f9af@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >On Jul 19, 2:48 pm, "zasochimti" <zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> >> "Disneygeek" <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:bdc3d554=
-8479-4c28-b84d-2a615fa2bbe3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >> >> On Jul 12, 2:55 pm, "zasochimti" <zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > Yes "we" do. The fact that there hasn't been a criminal
investi=
gation into the events of
> > >> >> > 9/11 speaks for itself, whacko "debunker".
>
> > >> >> > Whether "we know who did it" or not, a criminal investigation
h=
ad to be conducted.
> > >> >> > And here you are, acting like a silly ***** because you don't
l=
ike that fact, whacko "debunker".
>
> > >> >> Now here's a thought. Who exactly would conduct this "criminal
> > >> >> investigation?" The government? The exact same government that
yo=
u
> > >> >> claim is actually BEHIND the destruction of the Towers and WTC7?
>
> > >> >> So if this investigation, after spending millions of taxpayer
dol=
lars,
> > >> >> came to the conclusion that you were full of hot air and there
IS=
 no
> > >> >> grounds for your theories, would you sit back and accept the
verd=
ict
> > >> >> or would you start screaming that the investigation was tainted
a=
nd
> > >> >> demand ANOTHER investigation to determine why the first
investiga=
tion
> > >> >> didn't reach the conclusions you expected them to?
>
> > >> >> ----------------------------------
>
> > >> >> So, bin Ladens weren't "smuggled" out of the country? Are you
sur=
e, whacko "debunker"?
>
> > >> >> Care to prove it?
>
> > >> >*Screech* 90 degree change of subject! Did I say anything about
the
> > >> >bin Ladens?
>
> > >> >They were allowed to leave on a chartered flight. Should they
have?=
 I
> > >> >don't know. But they were hardly "smuggled."
> > >> >--------
>
> > >> >Which "chartered flight" was able to fly on 9.11.2001. whahahacko
"=
disneygeek"?
>
> > >> None. The Bin Laden family did not leave on 9.11.2001. They left on
> > >> 9.13.2001.
>
> > >Sack-o is losing it. Let's hope PHDip**** can pick up the slack.
>
> > Damn! That Sack-o meltdown tonight/today (depending on your timezone)
w=
as
> > massive. I wouldn't be surprised if he's popped a vein.
>
> > PHDip**** has a long way to go to being an amusing kOOk. So far he's
ju=
st a
> > kOOk.
>
> PHDip**** showed early promise of bringing on som fresh comedic
> material, but he had no stamina for the long haul. He's turned into a
> raving sack-o. ****, we can get the real rave from sack-o himself.
> PHDip****, if you're reading, STEP IT UP A NOTCH, kooker! Otherwise we
> just might have to ignore your stupid ass.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
           >STEP IT UP A NOTCH, kooker! Otherwise we
             just might have to ignore your stupid ass.<

The only stupid arse around these parts is the one you are sitting on
where the remnants of your brain drained down to and where said
remains govern your predictable posts.