Re: McCain asked about PNAC and 9/11 at town hall

On Jul 21, 9:55=A0pm, Government ****ll #2 <gov.sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:25:19 -0700 (PDT), Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >Government ****ll #2 wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:20 +0200, "zasochimti"
<zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >"Disneygeek" <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:20436e91-285=
b-47e3-a208-d9bd9939f9af@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >On Jul 19, 2:48 pm, "zasochimti" <zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> "Disneygeek" <edrho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:bdc3d554-8=
479-4c28-b84d-2a615fa2bbe3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> On Jul 12, 2:55 pm, "zasochimti" <zasochi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> > Yes "we" do. The fact that there hasn't been a criminal
investiga=
tion into the events of
> >> >> > 9/11 speaks for itself, whacko "debunker".
>
> >> >> > Whether "we know who did it" or not, a criminal investigation
had=
 to be conducted.
> >> >> > And here you are, acting like a silly ***** because you don't
lik=
e that fact, whacko "debunker".
>
> >> >> Now here's a thought. Who exactly would conduct this "criminal
> >> >> investigation?" The government? The exact same government that you
> >> >> claim is actually BEHIND the destruction of the Towers and WTC7?
>
> >> >> So if this investigation, after spending millions of taxpayer
dolla=
rs,
> >> >> came to the conclusion that you were full of hot air and there IS
n=
o
> >> >> grounds for your theories, would you sit back and accept the
verdic=
t
> >> >> or would you start screaming that the investigation was tainted
and
> >> >> demand ANOTHER investigation to determine why the first
investigati=
on
> >> >> didn't reach the conclusions you expected them to?
>
> >> >> ----------------------------------
>
> >> >> So, bin Ladens weren't "smuggled" out of the country? Are you
sure,=
 whacko "debunker"?
>
> >> >> Care to prove it?
>
> >> >*Screech* 90 degree change of subject! Did I say anything about the
> >> >bin Ladens?
>
> >> >They were allowed to leave on a chartered flight. Should they have?
I
> >> >don't know. But they were hardly "smuggled."
> >> >--------
>
> >> >Which "chartered flight" was able to fly on 9.11.2001. whahahacko
"di=
sneygeek"?
>
> >> None. The Bin Laden family did not leave on 9.11.2001. They left on
> >> 9.13.2001.
>
> >Sack-o is losing it. Let's hope PHDip**** can pick up the slack.
>
> Damn! That Sack-o meltdown tonight/today (depending on your timezone)
was
> massive. I wouldn't be surprised if he's popped a vein.
>
> PHDip**** has a long way to go to being an amusing kOOk. So far he's
just=
 a
> kOOk.
>
> --
> ****ll #2
>
> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
> =A0theobviousgcashman- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

           <Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round,
round and round... <

Yeah, you're the loon and all you do is go round and round - boring
little post fart.