On Jul 23, 9:44=A0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> sack-o-****i wrote:
> > "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:MPG.22efdcb=
88db9c44c989999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > In article <g64upu$dc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:MPG.22ef=
40dc21dbbc1198998b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > In article <g62isq$pc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >> > sak-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > >> >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:MPG.2=
2ee8b63831ff0d498997d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> > In article <g62bff$qh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >> >> > sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > >> >> >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:MP=
G.22ed3fbe678f2d83989962@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> > In article <g5uq5j$p0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >> >> >> > sack-o-****...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > >> >> >> >> "BDK" <****llk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews=
:MPG.22ec5a2d14057c7b989950@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> >> > In article <g5tqq7$vc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > >> >> >> >> > sack-o-sh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> "Patrick Keenan" <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:2r=
6dnb_tYche8B_VnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> >> >> > "VTR" <vexjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:O-edncBeY=
b8Hyx_VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> June 10, 2008 - 5:13PM
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Sen. Karen Johnson's floor speech about 9/11
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Provided to the Tribune
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 9/11 Floor Speech
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> MR. PRESIDENT =3D3F POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS IN THE GALLERY =3D3F and then
=
I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT MY REMARKS OF
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> MORE THAN 200 WORDS BE ENTERED INTO THE JOURNAL.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Members -- I would like to introduce a very special
g=
uest who has been joined today by several
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> of his closest friends. Up in the gallery, we have
ma=
ny of the members of the Phoenix 9/11
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Truth group =3D3F people who are asking for a new,
in=
dependent investigation of the attacks of
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Sept. 11, 2001. In particular, I would like to
introd=
uce to you a VERY courageous man named
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Blair Gadsby. I=3D3Fm going to ask the folks with
Bla=
ir to help him to stand as I tell you a little
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> about him. Blair is very weak because he has been
fas=
ting for more than two weeks to try to
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> bring attention to the cause of 9/11 Truth. This is
t=
he 16th day that Blair has gone without
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> food and spent his day outside the office of U.S.
Sen=
ator John McCain pleading with the senator
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> to take a look at new evidence in the 9/11 crimes.
We=
have one man who is sacrificing his own
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> personal needs and desires to stand boldly pleading
f=
or the world to take notice, to question,
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> to research and not place their lives into the hands
=
of media sound-bites, - to think for
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> themselves, consciously and critically. Blair is an
e=
ducator and to me this is what the great
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> educators do. Thousands of people all over the
countr=
y and actually around the world have been
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> watching on the internet as this Hunger Strike
progre=
sses here in Phoenix. I want Blair to know
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> that I am his biggest fan and that good people
everyw=
here admire him for his courage and
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> determine. Please give a warm welcome to Blair
Gadsby=
and the Phoenix 9/11 Truth movement. (STOP)
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >>
*****************************************************=
********
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> (FLOOR SPEECH) Last month, I started speaking
publicl=
y regarding my concerns about the attacks
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> of Sept. 11, 2001, which brought down the Twin
Towers=
of the World Trade Center, as well as
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Building 7. If you=3D3Fve watched the media coverage
=
since I first began to speak out, you know how
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> vicious and irrational it has been toward me. The
med=
ia have worked hard to try to make it seem
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> silly to even question the 9/11 Commission Re****t,
ev=
en though some of its own authors have
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> done so, including both of the Commission
Co-Chairmen=
=3D3F Mr. Hamilton and Keane.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Actually, the 9/11 Commission Re****t represents just
=
one theory =3D3F the theory that fire and the
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> damage from the airplane impacts brought down the
thr=
ee buildings. This theory explains none of
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> the features of the destruction
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > Actually, it explains all of them.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> that we all witnessed that day and which we can
still=
observe
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> on hundreds of videos. It explains nothing about how
=
in four out of four cases, no hijacking
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> code was transmitted by the hijacked airliners, and
i=
n four of four cases, no fighter jets
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> managed to get alongside any of the hijacked
airliner=
s.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > Neither of those are "features of destuction" of the
b=
uildings themselves. They may be features of the hijacking,
> > >> >> >> >> >> > but
> > >> >> >> >> >> > not
> > >> >> >> >> >> > of
> > >> >> >> >> >> > the
> > >> >> >> >> >> > collapses.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> The military officers who lied to
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Congress about their failure to protect America
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > And who, exactly, were these military officers? =A0
Na=
mes and ranks, please, and be clear about the nature of the
> > >> >> >> >> >> > lies.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > If you're going to claim that people lied, at least
ha=
ve the backbone to identify them.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> would have been referred for prosecution by
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> some of the 9/11 Commissioners, but those
Commissione=
rs were told that they did not have that
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> authority.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > Which is probably true. =A0 Read the terms of the
comm=
ission to find out.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >>The events of that day were a heinous crime against
ou=
r nation and our citizens,
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > Yes they were, and most of those who perpetrated it
di=
ed in the event.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> and
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> the sense of justice that exists in each one of us
de=
mands to know what really happened and how
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> all the perpetrators will be caught and punished.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > How, exactly, does the speaker propose that we catch
a=
nd punish the dead?
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> The speculation and theorizing won=3D3Ft end
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> until a thorough, transparent investigation, free of
=
conflicts of interest, takes place.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Among the many theories that you can find on the
Inte=
rnet is one that rises above all the rest.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> It is rock-solid, confirmed by hard evidence, and
sup=
****ted by hundreds of scholars,
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> architects, engineers and other professionals who
hav=
e the education, training, and expertise
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> to know what they=3D3Fre talking about. This is the
t=
heory that explosive demolitions brought down
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> the Twin Towers and Building 7.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > Oh, please.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > There is no such "rock-solid" evidence for controlled
=
demolition. =A0 It does not exist.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> But there is rock solid evidence of US gvt deliberately
=
obstructing the work
> > >> >> >> >> >> of the 9/11 Commission. From the fact that they've
stall=
ed it's set up, to the
> > >> >> >> >> >> fact that Zelikow was "monitoring" the work of the 9/11
=
Commission and
> > >> >> >> >> >> "supplying" it with do***ents the White House cleared
fi=
rst.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> Geroge Bush is a moron. And so are you, Patrick. You
des=
erve each other.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> And don't you look at me. Not my fault. It's your
fault.=
Live with it.
>
> > >> >> >> >> > BWHAHAHAHA! You're drooling again, Sack...
>
> > >> >> >> >> Since you've replied, that means I am not.
>
> > >> >> >> > And my reply is connected with your drooling in what way?
>
> > >> >> >> > Drooling kooks are funny.
>
> > >> >> >> And again. Since you've replied twice, that means I am
neither=
"drooling" nor a "kook".
>
> > >> >> > You think too much of yourself Sack. I reply BECAUSE you're a
d=
rooling
> > >> >> > kook.
>
> > >> >> > Why can't you get that through that incredibly tiny head of
you=
rs?
>
> > >> >> Third reply. Keep 'em coming, BDK.
>
> > >> > Your delusions fascinate me.
>
> > >> Fourth one, BDK.
>
> > > You can count to four?
>
> > > Good for you!! Your folks must be so proud.
>
> > > And to think the doctors said you would never make it past three.
>
> > > And the next number is what Sackso****y?
>
> > And again, your constant replying prove you wrong, old fart.
>
> BWAHAHAAHHAAAAAA!!! You got him, BDK!! Sack-o couldn't get past
> three!! He's covering up for the fact that he doesn't know the next
> number! BWAHAHAAAHHAAAAAA!!!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>He's covering up for the fact that he doesn't know the
next
number! BWAHAHAAAHHAAAAAA!!!<
Since yo the cover-up expert as a debunker its you who cant get by the
last number.
|
