"z" <gzuckier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:21e6e082-0e13-4a2b-b90f-075c10fd663b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul 24, 10:56 pm, "aroberts" <a-rober...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Imagine what an education can do for you.
>
> Or do you mean indoctrination?
no, he didn't mean "indoctrination", nobody means "indoctrination". an
education would let you know that.
So disagreement with the orthodoxy of the global warming alarmists evinces
a
lack of education? That sounds rather unenlightened and...uneducated.
Your
use of run-on sentences certainly attests to your level of education.
I am probably formally and informally better educated than you, and hold
patents on a number of scientific devices. In fact, you are quite wrong
that "...nobody means indoctrination." I mean it, because many of the
advocacy groups (on both sides) are dogmatic in their beliefs. The matter
of humanity's impact on global warming is by no means settled, and is the
subject of continuing research and examination. As a person who makes a
living in the sciences and respects the Scientific Method, I am content
to
place the conclusion in its proper order: After the hypothesis, not
before.
Take a moment from basking in your self-pronounced education to look at
some
of the data of multi-decadal oscillations of ocean currents in the Arctic
Circle. The analyses of Polykov, Wattenburg and Buch are particularly
salient in that they show a cylical character to the pH, salinity and CO2
over the past century.
|
