Michael Moore not what he appears to be?
First, Michael Moore's F9-11 limited-hangout cover-up of the best
inside-job-pointing evidence done for Eisner and Kerry is finally being
seen for whitewash it is. Nicho Haupt has garnered reviews of Moore's
false-opposition documentary at
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/index.php?storytopic=4&storynum=30
--
Item #2:
Zionist coverup artist Mark Robinowitz dismisses small-plane and all
no-Boeing findings -- but look at the reasons he gives!!!
by Dick Eastman
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Mark Robinowitz correctly discredits the webfaries and the letsrollers,
but
his real purpose is to include the small-plane finding from the Pentagon
crash evidence and witnesses, tarring the conclusively established case
against the administration with the incompetent and the deliberately
misleading ones.
Take a look:
From: Mark Robinowitz <mark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: June 30, 2004 3:58:16 AM GMT+07:00
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
Subject: new bogus 9/11 effort -- "In Plane Site" movie based on phony
evidence
> "911 In Plane Site," a new movie by a website called "The Power Hour,"
> mixes accurate material about September 11 with easily disproved, bogus
> information. It is toxic to the cause of exposing the Bush regime's
complicity
> in 9/11, since much of it is based on poor quality, manipulated photos
and
> misunderstandings.
<jump>
> How does a plane 125 ft. wide & 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is
> only 16 ft. across [rebuttal: the hole is about the diameter of the
fuselage
> of the plane. None of the "no plane at the Pentagon" theories
DE: Robinowitz, knows the real evidence in the Pentagon case, he knows--
as
shown by his earlier responding to evidence summaries sent by me to the
sf911thruthalliance group (Carol Brouillet, Carol Schumer etc.) where we
both have been subscribed -- that the problem for the official story is
the multiple lines of hard photo evidence yielding the unescapable
conclusion THAT THERE WAS NO HOLE MADE BY THE STARBOARD ENGINE, that
were
the starboard engine should have hit, given the location of the hole
where
the fuselage penetrated at column #14, we see pillar #16 still standing !
and interior wall still intact on either side of it !
Also the hole at the second-floor level is not 16 ft. across, but just
slighly more than 10 ft. across.
There is also the fact that column #15 was obviously blasted away at close
to ground level, where a fuselage of a Boeing, had the killer jet been a
Boeing 757, could not possibly have touched due to the fact that the
engines of Boeing 757s hang so much lower than the fuselage. Column #15,
in fact, was blasted away by the missile warhead explosion that we see in
the first picture of the security-video camera sequence, its steel
reinforcement bars remaining following the blast !
And in addition to these items of evidence, there is also a second hole
in
the Pentagon outer west wall at second-floor level that is far to the
right of where the killer jet crashed-- too far to have been part of the
killer jet attack -- where a penetrating air-to-ground missile must have
entered the building to take out targeted Pentagon personnel.
And finally, we have the fact that the damage to the wall is too "short"
--
the tail fin of the Boeing 757, even with the engines scrapping along the
grass, would still have reached to the fourth-floor -- however there is
not a scratch or a broken window on the third or fourth floors in any of
the
various photos taken by different witnesses after the crash and prior to
the
collapse of the wall.
Clearly a smaller jet (called by investigators "the small-plane," or "the
killer jet," and thought most likely to have been an modified F-16)
entered the first floor after a missile softened the outer wall at that
level for the jet's easy entry. The 10ft. hole on the second floor,
directly above, was made by the tail fin of the jet fighter hitting the
wall between two windows, most of the hole being the vacant window
openings
themselves.
Mark Robinowitz, then is bullshitting readers with this "reason" for
throwing out the Pentagon evidence with the obvious junk and disinfo
sites,
and is, thereby, exposed as part of the 9-11 frame-up cover-up, plain
and
simple -- caught red handed and , one can only hope, destined to one day
face justice.
But Mark Robinowitz digs himself deeper.
<jump>
> How does a 757 exit the Pentagon's 3rd ring & leave a hole
> approximately 16 ft. across with no visible wreckage
> [note: this is an anomaly that is very difficult to explain. If it
really
> is true that the plane did go through several rings of the Pentagon,
> that would be strong evidence for the something-other-than-a-plane
> theory. However, there were way too many witnesses from a variety
> of backgrounds who saw a large jet at the Pentagon. The real, 100%
> provable fact of the Pentagon crash, which nobody disputes, is that
> the Pentagon was hit in the nearly empty, recently reconstructed and
> strengthened sector, which minimized casualties.
> See http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
and
> http://www.oilempire.us/remote.html
for details.]
DE: Again, Mark Robinowitz is taking advantage of the general ingorance of
the facts of the case to plant bad information that supports the coverup.
The photogrpahed "imprint" of the killer jet (see above) wells us the
killer jet's fuselage entered the first floor, its raised tail fin taking
out the pillar between two windows on the second floor (total hole on
second
floor 10 ft.after the windows on either side were popped out), but not
reaching beyond the second-floor level.
But the floor plan released by the ASCE etc. shows that there are no
concentric rings in the Pentagon at the first-floor level in this section
of the building (i.e., no heavy outer walls separating the outer "E"-ring
from the "D" and "C"-rings -- it being all one building on these lower
floors, merely with pillars heavy concrete floors and interior walls that
are no more than flimsy room partitions. The single-engine military jet
entered at column #14 and flew through the building, hitting some pillars
on
the way, its engine and some of the fuselage that contained the engine,
exiting the wall of "C"-ring that faces the more-interior "B"-ring, the
engine landing in the outside space between ring "C" and ring "B", making
a
6 ft. round hole (not a 16 ft. hole as Power Hour says and as Robinowitz
fails to correct).
Clearly Robinowitz has gone so far into horrible wicked obstruction of
justice to cover up Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Donald Rumsfeld and the
neo-con Zionist accomplices.
And deeper:
> While it's blatantly obvious that 9/11 was an "inside job," bogus claims
> based on altered images that make no sense only discredit factual
inquiry
> into "the event that changed the world."
DE: Yes, Robinowitz is correctly against taking light reflections as
humps
and against saying that all the attacking planes were holograms, but how
clever to discredit the true best evidence by throwing it into the garbage
can with these bogus theories, trying to toss the best evidence which
alone points the finger of deep involvement guilt at the,
like-Robinowitz,
Zionists who are the proven implicates of the best Pentagon evidence.
Robinowitz's attack on the best evidence marks him himself as evidence of
Zionist Pentagon neo-con involvement and a Zionist coverup --
Robinowitz,
however, does not seem to mind if just WASPs in the White House or
non-descript scapegoatable others are blamed.
> In addition to phony evidence in support of the official conspiracy
> theory, there is also the problem of bogus material pretending to
> be investigative journalism that does not bother to present even
> a scintilla of credible evidence.
You can see why Robinowitz is part of the sf911truthalliance
false-opposition front in the heart of Dian Finestine-WIlly Brown
country,
and managed by proven evidence-blocking disinformationalists Carol
Brouillet, Carol Schumer, Kyle Hence -- who in turn are close associates
of
the big-time cover-up accomplices John Judge, Mike Rivero, Mike Ruppert
--
who the proven perpetrators by in every way possible promoting the lie
that sufficient evidence to identify specific perpetrators at the Pentagon
does not exist.
Here is the evidence the Mark Robinowitz definitely knew of when he wrote
his hatchet-job article and has contrived to deny and to keep from you
with
lies about the true content and merit of the evidence.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
Pass this around -- the people must be given the facts.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
===========
About Robinowitz's hatchet-job article, Gerard Holmgren Writes:
I don't take Robinowitz seriously enough to comment on. Heh ! He thinks
that
a giant plane flew through a hole many times smaller than itself, without
breaking off any parts and then vanished !
He has the ultimate proof of this , you see. CNN told him so . Robinowitz
thinks (and I use the word loosely ) those those who assert the
revolutionary physics theory that a solid object cannot pass through
another solid object without leaving a hole at least as big as itself are
govt agents.
Robinowitz believes that CNN tells him the truth and that you guys are all
a
pack of liars.
Robinowitz, through careful reasearch has concluded that a thimbleful of
kero has the destructive power of several Hiroshamas - but that such force
is only applicible to planes - not buildings which are in just as close
proximity.
If its really necessary for me to take a blowtorch to Robinowitz, then we
are probably wasting our time.
Robinowitz's contribution to research is .... ?????
Robinowitz's contribution to distributing research is .... ???
Robinowitz's activities, apart from bashing people like us are ..... ???
---
FYI: Gerard Holmgren has put together his new 9-11 evidence package kit.
(We used to work closely together, but my criticism of his friend and
collaborator Jared Israel, who I say protects Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith
and other Zionist neo-cons by studiously ignoring the best evidence ,
caused
a break. Holmgren still puts out the otherwise best all around summary
of
evidence of the 911 frame-up.
See Gerards latest summary (with plenty of Jared Israel's research as
well)
at:
http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=50
===========
NOTES ON MICHAEL MOORE'S LIMITED HANGOUT COVERUP:
(progress notes from Dick Eastman)
MICHAEL MOORE's DOCUMENTARY IS THE GRAND DECEPTION -- YOU WERE SO
STARVED
TO SEE SOMEONE INVESTIGATING 911 RECOGNIZED AND VALIDATED BY THE MEDIA
THAT
WHEN MICHAEL MOORE REHASHES A FEW OF OUR OLD ITEMS -- NONE OF WHICH
SERIOUSLY INCRIMINATE THE ADMINISTRATION -- YOU ALL SUDDENLY FALL AT
HIS
FEET IN WORSHIP OF YOUR NEW SAVIOR -- JUST AS ALL SOCIALISTS AND
VARIETIES
OF LEFTIST GOT BEHIND LENIN WHEN HE BECAME THE FIRST SOCIALIST TYPE TO
HEAD A MAJOR COUNTRY - REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE WAS AS A THINKER AND A MAN
AND THEN WITH STALIN AND SHUNTING BETTER MEN, SMARTER AND MORE HUMANE MEN
OF GOOD WILL ASIDE.
YOU WORSHIP MICHAEL MOORE NOT BECAUSE HE HAS DISCOVERED MORE EVIDENCE --
HE
DIDN'T -- IN FACT HE DIDN'T EVEN SHARE ANY OF THE MOST IMPROTANT EVIDENCE
THAT INDEPENDENT CITIZEN INVESTIGATORS HAVE ALREADY UNCOVERED -- HE
AVOIDED
TALKING TO THE BEST INVESTIGATORS, SUCH AS PROFESSOR A.K. DEWDNEY AND THE
EVIDENCE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY SELECTED AS EVIDENCE THAT DOES NOT
POINT TO THE VERY PEOPLE THAT THE BEST EVIDENCE THAT HE AVOIDED USING
POINTS
TO.
BUILDING A CASE ON TRIVIA OR SIDE-MATTERS (EVACUATING RICH SAUDI FAMILIES
ON
SEPT. 11 ETC.) AND ACTIVELY AVOIDING ENGAGING THE MOST POWERFUL AND
INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE -- MOORE IS SERVING THE WILL OF THE MONOPOLY
MEDIA
POWERS HAVE PUFFED HIM AND PUT HIS NAME UP IN LIGHTS.
THE FACT IS THAT I COULD MAKE A VIDEO SHOWING THE REAL PHOTO EVIDENCE OF
THE
PENTAGON FOR ABOUT $700 DOLLARS THAT COULD CONVINCE EVERYONE WHO SAW IT
OF
THE GUILT OF THE TRUE PERPETRATORS -- AND I WOULD HAVE PROFESSOR DEWDNEY,
LONGSPAUGH AND OTHERS GIVING HARD SCIENCE AND ESTABLSIHED EVIDENCE PROVING
THE EVENT THAT IN TURN PROVES THE GUILT OF THE PENTAGON LEADERSHIP.
But instead -- the monopoly corporations raise up Michael Moore with
watered down limited-hangout that points no finger at the real guilty
--
that in fact hides the evidence and distracts from the evidence that
really
does point that finger!!! -- and you worship him because of
Establishment
sponsorship that has nothing to do with the merit of this documentary,
that
has everything to do with the intentional inadequacy of his documentary
--
MOORE'S DOCUMENTARY BEING AS FUNDAMENTALLY DEFICIENT AS THE BOGUS 911
COMMISSION OR THE 'PEOPLES INVESTIGATION OF 911 COVER-UP OF THE PENTAGON
EVIDENCE DONE BY CAROL BROUILETTE, JOHN JUDGE, MIKE RIVERO, AND
COP-ON-THE-TAKE RUPPERT.
Moore -- paid for by Eisner, puffed by the very media that has blacked
out
all other investigators, NOT AT ALL INDICATING THAT US INSIDERS WERE
EVEN
POSSIBLY PERPETRATORS, NOT INDICATING THAT ISRAEL OR TOP ZIONIST
BILLIONARIES MIGHT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED, NEVER DOUBTING THAT THERE WERE
ARAB
HIJACKERS, HIMSELF BLAMING SAUDI ARABIA (AS WOLFOWITZ BLAMED
AFGANISTAN
AND BUSH AND WOLFOWITZ BLAMED IRAQ AND THUS GIVING KERRY HIS REASON TO
ATTACK SAUDI ARABIA!!!!!!! -- THIS SAME MICHAEL MOORE IS NOW THE
LEADING
VOICE, THE INFALLIBLE PONTIFF OF 9-11 INVESTIGATORS
I SENT HIM THE BEST EVIDENCE AND HE INGORED IT, NO ONE WOULD EVEN SUSPECT
THAT THE PENTAGON EVIDENCE EXISTS FROM LOOKING AT MICHAEL MOORE'S CLEVER
LIMITED-HANGOUT KERRY-ELECTING COVER-UP PIECE.
=============
Are my critics really honest in their characterization of my articles?
I am always running across this odd criticism of my efforts:
"Dick attacks everyone who disagree with him,"
but that is not really true, not really what I do.
While it is true that I point out errors of fact and logic when I think
the errors important enough to note -- I do not attack the person's
motives UNLESS:
I do not attack the person expressing the viewpoint unless I have detected
that they are deliberately planting falsehoods to confuse and to undercut
the real evidence that establishes what actually happened, that solves the
crime. The persons I label as false opposition are persons who have been
caught telling falsehoods that they must know are untrue -- wrong
information that the giver knows is wrong but gives anyway as part of an
obstruction of justice, a coverup of mass-murder crimes, of high treason
designed to bring about national ruin and enslavement.
99 percent of the population disagrees with me -- but far from
"attacking"
them -- I am trying to awaken them for the good of us all.
I even try to awaken the consciences of the sell-outs, cowards and
raitors -- its never too late to repent and start loving your fellow man.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
|
