You have reached the transformation site on internet.
Jolt into grim but not hopeless political reality here --
the true nature of the pivotal event of future history:
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
Conclusive Proof Zionist Neo-cons guilty of 911 Mass-Murder Black-op
Dick Eastman
-------------------------------------
I believe our government and society can be cleansed of corruption and
restored to true sovereign Constitutional representative government by and
for the people by simple application of the truth about 911.
Americans need to see the evidence that proves that the attacks on the
United States, September 11, 2001, was the execution of a plan devised by
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle, Kissinger at the Pentagon with of
course
CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, White House, Mossad, ****n Bet, MI6 and MI5
involvement.
The evidence from the attack on the Pentagon is immediately convincing
and
conclusive -- although every effort is being made by the perpetrators to
"neutralize" this information by every possible means.
Here is the evidence:
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
http://www.911-strike.com/pentagon-all.htm
http://www.globalfreepress.com/ewing2001/911/1.shtml
If you will take the trouble to familiarize yourself with this evidence
you
will then be able to speed the overthrow this usurping conspiracy against
our Jeffersonian republic by Zionist and secret-society mass-murdering
economy-plundering organized crime.
Sincerely,
Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Wa****ngton 98908
U.S.A.
======================
Now that you are free of the grand deception, let's take a little
educational excursion "outside the matrix:"
------
Item #1:
From X (mistakenly attrributed to Seymore Hersh last week):
These Israeli citizens came into Iraq disguised as Arab or Kurdish
civilians, businessmen. Maybe "contractors"? Under contract with the
Pentagon's neocon office? Your tax dollars at work?
How much of their work is blamed on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? How much of
Israel's terrorism is blamed on "Al-Qaeda"?
I have investigated the development of the "mujahideen" and here is my
conclusion:
In the 80's, Israel supervised the recruitment of Arab Afghan "mujahideen"
supposedly to fight against Russia. They became cannon fodder and
refugees
before they ended up in Guantanamo.
THEIR REAL PURPOSE WAS TO HELP ISRAEL CREATE A USEFUL MYTH: AL-QAEDA.
The Arab mujahideen were rather harmless as recent revelations from
Guantanamo have shown.
Israeli and Jewish-American intelligence specialists were trusted by the
CIA--Israelis being "allies" and experts on the Middle East--to recruit
the
Arab "mujahideen" to be used by the US against Russia. Israelis disguised
as Arab or Pakistani missionaries (tablighis) even ran the recruitment
centers. Israelis playing Muslim missionaries (tablighis) were caught in
India and Israel rushed to retrieve them.
The Arab "mujahideen" themselves were inefficient and almost useless. I
have heard from the relatives of many who died in vain in clumsy
incidents
in Afghanistan.
All the Zionists wanted was a story, a myth that would enable them to
create another myth: "Al Qaeda." The Zionists needed this myth as an
excuse
for their long-term plans for the "war on terror," a war to destabilze
the
Middle East and pit the world against Muslims.
Neither Bin Laden nor the Arab refugees he took care of were of any
military significance. The Afghans themselves were the real efficient
mujahideen because they knew the territory and the tribal structure. The
Afghans actually saw the Arabs as nuisance.
Arabs say "nothing comes out of a pot except what's in it." When the
neocon
liars speak about Arab/Islamic terrorism and Al-Qaeda, they are in fact
talking about what they themselves are doing. They are talking about
Israeli covert activities.
No Arabs are involved. Israeli commandos move around using forged or
stolen
Arab ID's and--if necessary--they wear masks to hide their real
identities,
such as in beheading videos.
Israelis continue to fake whatever it takes to prove that the "war on
terror," i.e. the war on Arabs has to continue.
Listen to them more carefully. The Zionists in our midst have been
telling
us the truth all along. Just replace "Arab" with "Israeli," replace
"Al-Qaeda" with "Mossad," etc.
===============
Item #2:
Dick Eastman responds point-by-point to the 7-19-04 NYT's article "Those
Who
Were Inspired to Hate the Modern World " by Edward Rothstein:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/10/arts/10CONN.html
> The Western world is decadent. Its emphasis on individualism is corrupt.
Its
materialism is dangerous. Its vision of modernity reflects not progress
but
regress. The West will destroy itself. But if it doesn't, its destruction
should be helped along. True salvation can be found only by returning to
ancient disciplines and beliefs.
[Dick Eastman comment: The Western World is decadant with ****ography (a
Jewish, not an Arab dominated industry, btw, including all the filth
glutting your inbox); with debt slavery (Islam opposes usury -- ruling
class Jews live by compound interest and manipulation of the money supply
through the New York Federal Reserve Bank); Islam IS NOT OPPOSED TO
INDIVIDUALISM -- the relation****p between each man and the Great Supreme,
Allah, is personal and individual, and individuals are allowed to own
property and conduct business and prosper -- as long as they give alms to
the poor, do not lie or cheat -- however every billionaire Jew I know of
is not an individualist -- he attempts to ruin and enslave the other
individuals -- he is not a Jeffersonaian Libertarian, but rather an
Anarcho-capitalist, who masters leveraged buyouts, currency manipulation,
government destabilion, the engineering of inflations followed by
depression/deflation that transfers all middle class assets into the hands
of the receivers etc. -- ARABS AND ISLAM ARE NOT OPPOSED TO SCIENCE AND
PROGRESS -- THEY GAVE THESE TO THE WEST -- ALL PHILOSPHY HAS COME FROM
GRE
ECE THROUGH ARABIC NATIONS, INCLUDING ALGEBRA AND THE 60 MINUTE CLOCK,
CHEMISTRY, ETC. ] ]
Such views may not seem totally unfamiliar. Similar doctrines are held by
Islamist terror groups and by those finding common cause with them.
[Dick Eastman comment: The view that Western Civilization is dying in
America is held by the whole world -- it is not only not unfamiliar, the
statement is also not unfair and not untrue -- the the extent Moslems
oppose the destruction of our culture at the hands of merchant bankers,
cor****ation billionaires and criminals insinuated into high positions in
govenment for the power of organized (kosher) crime -- to that extent is
Islam the friend of Western Civilization, indeed of all Civilization
against
the universal blight of Civilizations!!!! ]
Writers
like Paul Berman have already shown a connection between Islamist ideas
and
20th-century Western Fascism, with its own atavistic hatreds of modernity.
[Dick Eastman comment: It takes a lot of brainwa****ng in Ivy League
schools
for someone to be abstracted from perceptions of the concrete and the
functional relations among things -- to such a vauge abstruse
semantically
indefinite and merely emotionally eliticitng a term as "modernism?" EVERY
CRIME AGAINST THE WORLD, AND, IN PARTICULAR, AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE
U.S.
BY A DEVIANT ALIEN-IDEOLOGY ELITE (note: Zionism is Talmudic and
Trotskyite
and disinformationist Edward Rothstein seems to be practicing it right
here!) IS THE RESULT OF A CRIMINAL ELITE -- WITH ITS OWN ZIONIST
VIEW THAT REQUIRES THE DESTRUCTION OF JEFFERSONIAN
FREEDOM WHICH HAS BEEN THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD
-- UNTIL SUBVERTED BY THE MORGANS, THE ROCKEFELLERS,
BARUCH, THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, THE
TRILATERAL COMMISSION, THE ZIONIST MONOPOLIZATION
OF MASS MEDIA ETC. )]
Some of these ideas have emerged on the political left, as well, appearing
in
Marxist thought and inspiring the anti-globalization movement. Their
impact
on
the political and religious landscape has been profound.
[Dick Eastman comment: Edward Rothstein rejects the possibility of
conspiracy -- governments and bankers and CEOs and politicians are all
being "up front" -- and anti-globalists and anti-Zionists and
anti-Conspiracists and populists really just hate progress, and
science,
and apple pie and motherhood -- that's Rothstein's message -- and every
sonofa***** I write to will probably eat it up, right?]
But how did such ideas develop? One surprising source turns out to be a
little-known group of 20th-century European intellectuals. They passed
these
ideas on to small groups of ardent followers, but their books and
pamphlets
gradually shaped a worldwide subculture of belief and devotion. Their
loose-limbed movement, which began in the 1920's, has been called
traditionalism.
[Dick Eastman comment: Nonesense!!! Islam breaks all traditions and
reduces faith to the simplest terms of submission to the Great Supreme --
no churches, no rabbi, no big organization -- just respected teachers --
every man faces god on his own with no intermediary -- only Mohammed
who
tells/relays to individuals that God is there and what that means. The
Crusades were a nightmare of horrible Christian crime. The 911
mass-murder
frame-up by "neo-con" Zionists ("the new con", not what the old "cold
war con" and ended -- they want to control us with 100 year war against
terror that does not exist -- but that sonofa***** Edward Rothstein is
trying to sell us all -- reasons to give up freedom, to submit to
Wolfowitz-Ridge rule under a succession of dictators all with concealed
Jewish background (like Kerry, Bush etc.) serving the Jewish-supremacist
Talmudic premises.]
The pioneers of traditionalism are not well known, but are now the subject
of
a new book by Mark Sedgwick, a historian of Islam who teaches at the
American
University in Cairo. He began writing "Against the Modern World:
Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the 20th Century"
(Oxford), thinking that it would be a study of Islam in the West, since
many
traditionalist figures were converts to Islam.
[Dick Eastman comment: You want secret history of the 20th Century come
to
me. I'll tell you about the role of Bernard Baruch -- the origins of
both
world wars, the great depression, the cold war, the Chinese Communist
victory, the true power behind communism --right up to the "hidden truth"
(so far, anyway) of who really was behind the deaths of over 2000 people
on
Sept. 11, 2001.
But he found that these conversions - many done in secret - were
associated
with broader religious theories. As he searched Web sites, sought
reluctant
interviewees and probed an esoteric culture, he also came upon
traditionalism's intersection with Fascism, the influence of
traditionalism
on
American religious studies and the influence of traditionalism on Islamic
thought.
[Dick Eastman comment: When a religion dies it becomes TRADITIONAL --
the
"mainstream" churches of the US, but more than that ZIONISM is the most
horrible and insidious of the spiritually dead secret network religions
--
and neither Edward Rothstein nor Mark Sedgwick will tell you so --
whereas
living religions -- Islam, the Jehovahs Witnesses ( a monotheisitc belief
that, for example, is now the second largest religion in Italy -- going
to
EVERYONE's door and telling them about the decay of the world system and
the
need for "the way" of God -- and Jehovah's witnesses do not have clergy
either, nor to they pass the collection box -- their meeting rooms are
simply that, meeting rooms etc.] BUT LOOK AT ZIONISM -- ALL TRADITION,
ALL
CONSPIRACY -- ALL ALIENTATED AND ALIENATING FROM THE CULTURE OF
FREEDOM THAT WAS SET UP BY JEFFERSON, THOMAS PAINE,
WA****NGTON, MADISON, PATRICK HENERY -- AND CARRIED
ON BY JACKSON -- DIED WITH LINCOLN -- BUT SOUGHT TO
BE REVIVED UNDER WILLIMAM JENNINGS BRYAN AND
HUEY LONG ETC. -- TRUE JEFFERSONIAN PRINCIPLES
-- ARE ALIVE AND WELL AND NOT-TRADITIONALIST
(JEFFERSON CALLED FOR REVOLUTIONS EVERY SO OFTEN
TO KEEP DYNAMIC FREEDOM ALIVE FOR ALL PEOPLE!!!
AND THAT IS WHAT RACIST RULING-CLASS EXPLOITATIVE
ZIONISM HAS ALWAYS OPPOSED -- LOOK AT WHO PAID
FOR THE BOADTRIP THAT BROUGHT EDWARD ROTHSTEINS
ANCESTORS TO NEW YORK HARBOR -- BROUGHT HERE
FOR THE POLITICAL CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY ETC.
BY THE MORGAN, HARRIMANS AND OTHER ROBBER BARONS
WITH TIES TO THE EUROPEAN ROTHSCHILDS. From Zionism to
Skull and Bones -- SECRET TRADIONS are death to Civilization.
While populism, Islam, freedom, true Sermon on the Mount Christianity
are not in any way traditional -- but alive and giving life and freedom
and
a future. And don't let any sonofa***** tell you different.]
The careers of its original advocates also turned out to be
elaborately eccentric: magic and sorcery mixed with Hinduism and Sufism;
scholar****p mixed with calls for revolution; devotion mixed with cult.
Dick Eastman comment: Oh, yeah? And look at the mysticism of Jew
Hollywood -- honoring humanity with a long running series in the lives of
serial killers == Ed Gene, Speck, and now on the video shelf, the first
woman serial killer, along with THREE DO***ENTARIES ON HER ACCOMPLISHMENT
AT
BLOCKBUSTER -- but try to find an educational do***entary there to help
with your homeschooling -- look for a biography of Edison, Jefferson,
Ford,
or any life that is really worth knowing about and you find NOTHING!!!
Look at all the supernatural horror movies, and kids movies about the
super-natural -- what the hell kind of adult mind wants to be filled with
Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Hocus Pocus, Sabina etc. -- everything
in
Jew entertainment media (including mass marketing paperbacks) is socery,
and magic -- the ZIonist brainwash has taken the naturally engineering
and
mechanical and inventive Americans and degraded them to superstitious
peasants seeking terror on film and living in terror and confusion and
pre-scientific night because of the Jew Zionist aristocracy brainwa****ng
and dumbing down their "inferiors" -- and Edward Rothstein is just
injecting everyone with another does of the same deadly and deforming
medicine.]
Mr. Sedgwick's history of traditionalism, the first scholarly effort by an
outsider, also sheds light on contem****ary passions.
Dick Eastman comment: Gee. Is that so? How about the contem****ary
passion
of psychologically programming boys in your psychological care to enter
their high school and shoot up their schoolmates -- merely to further a
gun
confiscation agenda -- soon followed by the exploitation movie by 9-11
cover-up artist Michael Moore -- how calls for gun confiscation with a
slick propaganda pice called Bowling for Columbine, while he conducts
terror -- for that is what it was -- against good man and
Constitution-believing patriot Charlton Heston. Michael Moore, who
deliberately blocked out the evidence that proves that 9-11 was a
ame-up. -- YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME? Well, let us stop right here and
settle
the matter:
Conclusive Proof Zionist Neo-cons guilty
of 911 Mass-Murder Black-op
I. Pentagon crash evidence proves frame-up, Implicates Pentagon
leader****p
in black-op
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
II. Richard Ko****mizu proves the mass-murdering hoax, identifies the
perpetrators and exposes a long-established conspiracy
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/meanwhile_j.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title2.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title3.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/doc4.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/doc5.htm
While the book is flawed by awkward organization and the need for more
systematic examination of traditionalist ideas,
[Dick Eastman comment: You mean it's a confused mess.]
it also makes clear how im****tant this neglected movement is.
[Dick Eastman comment: You have neglected it hitherto because it is
immently
worth neglecting, but now you find it im****tant because it fits your
Zionist
propaganda needs, Edward Rothstein.]
On his Web site
(www.traditionalists.org), Mr. Sedgwick lists more than 200 traditionalist
organizations and Web sites in 34 countries.
[Dick Eastman comment: Great. So when the Moslems are all murdered you
can
have the Bush-Kerry tag team go after Catholics and anyone else who has a
cache of intellectual traditions that are not under your direct
mass-psycololgical control. (I wish people realized I am not
exagerating!)
Even the arts now reflect
traditionalist influence. The British composer, Sir John Tavener, whose
seven-hour work, "The Veil of the Temple," will receive its United States
premiere on July 24 as part of the Lincoln Center Festival, writes
religious
minimalist music and praises traditionalist writers, describing one,
Firthjof
Schuon (1907-98), as he "in whose mystical presence I live."
[Dick Eastman comment: And Tavener, the minimalist composer, is helping
terrorism and Moslems and the death of Western Civilization how?]
One of the central do***ents of traditionalism is a relatively brief book,
first published in 1927, "The Crisis of the Modern World." Its author,
René
Guénon (1886-1951), born in Blois, France, to Catholic parents, had been a
student of mathematics but soon turned to theosophy, Masonry, medieval
Christianity, Hinduism and, finally, Islam. Guénon moved to Cairo and
later
seemed to retreat into solitude, fearing evil sorcery.
[Dick Eastman comment: I notice he didn't turn to Judaism, or Zionism, or
that extremely traditionalist and ritual and formula dominated cult,
Communism etc. -- which makes me wonder who is bankrolling his book or
promting Edward Rothstein to puff it.]
His philosophy was, as Mr. Sedgwick acknowledges, "not especially
original."
But he had a charismatic impact. In the 1920's, Ananda Kentish
Coomaraswamy,
the curator of the Department of Indian Art at the Boston Museum of Fine
Arts,
wrote that "no living writer in modern Europe is more significant" than
Guénon. In the 1940's, André Gide believed that if he had read Guénon
earlier,
his life would have been changed.
[Dick Eastman comment: And so how did your essay on Islam and its attitude
towards the decline in Western Civilization suddenly fizzle into this
excursis on Gide (the frog fairy author of L'Imoraliste) -- you drop
the
chic buzz-topic Guénon but not a word you have said relates it to the
topic
you started out with -- or are people supposed to have stopped reading
after getting down this far, and you are just peppering it with
high-brow-appeal names in case someone skims the remaining lines -- you
can't think, you can't write and you can't even lie, Edward Rothstein.]
Guénon's argument was that the 20th-century West represented the final
stage
of a final age, the apotheosis of worldly decadence, in which materialism
was
emphasized over the spirit, individuality over community.
[Dick Eastman comment: The century it is cannot be a causal factor.
Events
and past ideas affect subsequent future events and ideas -- but so do the
complex and individual histories of given thinkers and actors in history
--
you and I. IT IS PURE DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM -- e.g., MODERN TROTSKYISM,
TO VIEW HISTORY AS A SUCCESSION OF STAGES AND THE FINAL STAGE SOMETHING
THAT MUST CRASH AND BURN TO MAKE WAY FOR THE BETTER STATE WAITING IN THE
WINGS. -- The fact is that worldy decadance has causes, it has agents
--
it results from perverse incentive systems and poor government rewarding
perversity and anti-productive speculation and cheating and manipulation
of
markets, and monopoly of production, of information, of education all for
the interests of the few --
THE ANSWER IS POPULISM -- AND ISLAM IS THE POPULISM OF ASIA AND AFRICA
--
SADAM AND MOHAMMED OMAR ARE GREAT LEADERS, GREAT MEN, REALLY AND TRULY
AGAINST THE GREAT SATAN OF ZIONIST AMERICAN GLOBALIZATION. And the fact
that the Taliban had to fall back on Mideval believes to counter Zionist
world enslavement, merely shows that the Islamic believes were all he had
in
his bag of resources with which to intellectually fight back -- do you
think he knows anyting about Jefferson, Pain, Jackson, Bryan or Huey
ong? -- ALL FOREIGNERS KNOW ABOUT AMERICA IS WHAT THEY SEE IN JEWISH
HOLLYWOOD HATE-REAL AMERICA MOVIES -- SERIAL KILLERS, ORGANIZED CRIME,
MARKETED ***UALITY, EXPLOITATION, VIOLENT "SUPER ACTION" FILMS WITH LOTS
OF
SADISM AND EXPLOSIONS -- THAT IS WHAT THE JEW ZIONIST WANTS TO MAKE THE
ONCE FREE AMERICAN -- PSYCOPATHS WHO WILL KILL ON COMMAND, WHO WILL SELL
BODY AND SOUL ON DEMAND. ]
The Renaissance, he proposes, was not a rebirth but a death; science,
rationality and humanism were products of delusion. A cure - or at any
rate,
a refuge - could be found in the primordial truths that underlay all
religions before modernity's distortions. Guénon scorned democracy; he
believed in a hierarchical religious elite and saw himself as one of its
elect.
[Dick Eastman comment: Ah, here it is!!!! Edward Rothstein says of
Guénon,
that he does not believe in Democracy (nor even the Representative
Democracy with limited Goverment given us by Jefferson etc.) -- but
rather,
" scoringing democracy," favors rule by a hierarchical religious elite"
--
the light suddenly comes on. Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, Kissinger, etc.
are all Zionists, all elite -- and Kerry too is Jewish and
Zionist --although he hides it in order to get power handed to him by the
deceived American voters. ROTHSTEIN IS ADVOCATING THAT WESTERN
CIVILIZATION BE REPLACED BY GUENON'S VISION -- RULE BY ZIONISTS (WHO ARE
EXCLUDED FROM THE LISTS OF REACTIONARY TRADITIONALISTS -- WHICH
TRADITIONALISTS MUST ALL BE ELIMINATED IN THE DELIBERATE DECLINING OF
WESTERN CIVILIZATION. YES. THAT IS WHAT ROTHSTEIN IS UP TO. -- LET IT
BE
SAID THAT DICK EASTMAN DIED UNFOOLED AND FIGHTING -- AND MAY IT BE LATER
BE
SAID THAT I HELPED BRING DOWN THE CONSPIRACY WHICH EDWARD ROTHSTEIN AND
HIS
ZIONIST LIKE SOUGHT TO PUT OVER ON EVERYBODY.
He was right about one thing: there was something revolutionary about the
notion of the individual that developed after the Renaissance.
[Dick Eastman comment: The Renaissance was the emergence of the rich
banker
(Medicis and the Florentines) over both the law and morality of the
culture.
This system falls short, as does the universal dogmatic priest-ridden
church
of the dark ages (with the message of Christ still ****ning through
occasional as with St. Francis etc.) -- Both are pre-Jeffersonain.
Men
like Rothstein can never be populists -- they deform the idea of freedom,
bending it into hypocritical and secretive and destructive progressivism
--
which under McKinnley andTeddy Roosevelt gave us imperialsim, which under
Wilson enslaved us with the income tax, the federal reserve system, direct
election of (buyable) Senators, and world war one for the profiteers etc.
and so forth down through the Baruch dominated New Deal. (I could write a
book, if there was an honsest publisher who was his own "individual" still
left in the world!!!)
He was right,
too, that religious and aesthetic compromises were required in a
democratic
culture with its beliefs in rights and liberties. But he could not imagine
any
way for a democratic culture of religion to develop: his religious truth
left
no room for reason or autonomy. The Reformation, for him, was a
deformation.
These views are what traditionalism shares with varieties of Islamic
fundamentalism.
[Dick Eastman comment: Here Rothstein is hinting at the "need" for one
religion (Zionism in his mind one must assume) to dominate over the rest,
because they CAN'T GET ALONG under rights and liberties. I am reminded of
the Jews who try to stop their children from "assimilating" into
non-religiousness and breaks with tradition. I am mindful of the
Wolfowtiz
plan to take over Moslem countries and make detainees out of the
incurable
"traditionalists" (Guantanamo is the Zionist answer for
traditionalism" -- remember a Jew (I just put out his name, but am in a
hurry here) designed Guantanamo containment facilities , and before 911.
AND NOW JOHN KERRY, WITH MICHAEL MOORE'S PROPAGANDA HELP, WILL NEXT WAGE
WAR
ON SAUDI ARABI, SO THAT ZIONISTS WILL CONTROL MECCA (COSTING HOW MUCH
AMERICAN AND BRITISH BLOOD AND HOWEVER MUCH EXTRA BLOOD FROM OTHER
COUNTRIES
WHO SEND THEIR SONS TO FIGHT BECAUSE THEIR GOVENMENT OR THEY THEMSELVES
PERSONALLY OWE MORE THAN THEY CAN HOP[E TO PAYBACK AND SO MUST PAY "IN
KIND."
They are also what led it to flirt with various leader****p cults and,
ultimately, with Fascism, most obviously in the work of an Italian
traditionalist, Julius Evola (1898-1974), who was inspired by Guénon.
Evola
wrote about the Holy Grail, about esoteric belief and magic, but in the
1920's
and 30's he tried to influence both Italian Fascism and German Nazism. Mr.
Sedgwick suggests that Evola even visited SS headquarters in Germany,
urging
the organization to supplement its vision with his.
[Dick Eastman comment: Again no mention of Skull and Bones (which ties
Zionists like Jewish Kerry to Bush and the other organized-crime elites
steeped in drug trade, *** slavery, and operations like the 9-11
mass-murder
false-flag frame-up.]
Evola wanted Fascism to be "more radical" and Nazism to be less bourgeois.
In
his 1934 book, "Revolt Against the Modern World," Evola wrote: "What is
really
needed is a total catharsis and a radical `housecleaning.' " One method
was
to
spur on "the most destructive processes of the modern era." It was a
message
hailed by right-wing Italian terrorist groups in the 1960's and, in
different
ways, by the left-wing terrorists who followed.
[Dick Eastman comment: Again -- Hitler was infiltrated into the basically
populist movement (anti-interest slavery views of Gottfried Feder) while
he
was working as a spy for the German Army. He made a deal with the
industrialists and murdered the populists in one night -- and his
anti-Jewish pogroms (Krystallhacht for example) were merely intended to
drive Jewish German professionals out of Germany so they could be on hand
to
give skills to Israel which was then in the making -- the halocaust is
in
part myth -- although when Hilter invaded Stalin it seems to have been a
true double cross of the double crossers ...
In a less blunt way, such tendencies were even evident in the early work
of
the Romanian scholar of religion, Mircea Eliade, who was influenced by
both
Ev
ola and Guénon in the 1920's and 30's. He later developed what Mr.
Sedgwick
calls a "soft traditionalism," devoting his career to studying archaic
religions and their views, an interest that influenced the course of
academic
religious studies in the United States.
[Dick Eastman comment: Americas problems began when the disastrous
muddled
and outright anti-scocial and evil thinking of Europeans was brought into
this country when our colleges began offering doctoral programs -- J.P.
Morgan was educated at Gottengen, for example -- and suddenly and
Jefferson
and Paine were replaced by a line of intellectual monsters that I am sure
Edward Rothstein can rattle off much better than I.
But in his earlier traditionalist
days, when he hailed "a nationalist Romania, frenzied and chauvinistic,"
Eliade was lured by the attractions of Romanian Fascism and the Iron
Guards,
a
past that came to light only after his death in 1986, leaving an indelible
blot on his reputation.
[Dick Eastman comment: nothing more worth commenting on -- I should have
stopped two paragraphs ago. I am sure you all get the point.]
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****ngton
===================
And finally this:
Item #3:
Bill Moyer's makes the case for a populist alternative (since
progressivism
is a zionist psy-op to undermine true Jeffersonian liberalism-populism.
This is an astounding summary of the domestic economic situation, not
hidden
in misleading numbers like GDP (which is anything but a measure of
"growth"
or "standard of living" or health of the economy) or "the interest
rate"
(which is really just the rate the Federal Reserve charges to lend to
banks
so they can afford to get closer to their reserve-requirement constrained
lending limits -- and has nothing to do with the money supply or the
availability of credit outside of the international finance loop etc.) --
but don't let me loose you -- scroll down from here to Bill Moyer's if
are
in a hurry
-----------------------
as phony as the political party difference between Republicans and
Democrats
is the ideological difference between conservatism and progressivism
Bill Moyer's -- a miracle of the truth sayer amidst the PBS prostituted
mouthpieces -- has made it clear how the real populist issues vital to
the
people of this nation go begging as the world is focused by the Zionist
media monopoly on the sham causes of the "war on terror," and
globalization from progressive John Kerry and conservative George W. Bush.
Take what Bill Moyers has said here and add the hard finding that 9-11 has
been proven to have been a mass-murder cover-up -- despite the evidence
covering false-investigations of the Commission, and of Mike Myer's with
his trivia-revealing limited hangout, and and of over three hundred sites
with as many inconclusives-centered and established-trivia centered "worst
evidence" websites and e-lists all burying the real investigations under
a
ton of glitz and spam "false-opposition" whose only purpose is to crowd
you
so you never see the best evidence etc.
Anyway, here is Moyer's most im****tant article (WHICH, IF ANY OF YOU WERE
REALLY BOTH RATIONAL AND ACTIVIST AT THE SAME TIME) should cause you too
seek a real populist alternative to Kerry-Bush-Nader.
Dick Eastman
Yakima
Bill Moyers: "This is the Fight of Our Lives"
--------
Excerpts from Bill Moyers' keynote speech at New York University, "This is
the Fight of Our Lives," delivered on June 3, 2004.
Read the rest of it at: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0616-09.htm
"Nothing seems to embarrass the political class in Wa****ngton today. Not
the fact that more children are growing up in poverty in America than in
any
other industrial nation; not the fact that millions of workers are
actually
making less money today in real dollars than they did twenty years ago;
not
the fact that working people are putting in longer and longer hours and
still falling behind; not the fact that while we have the most advanced
medical care in the world, nearly 44 million Americans -- eight out of ten
of them in working families -- are uninsured and cannot get the basic care
they need.
Astoni****ng as it seems, no one in official Wa****ngton seems embarrassed
by
the fact that the gap between rich and poor is greater than it's been in
50
years -- the worst inequality among all western nations. Or that we are
experiencing a ****ft in poverty. For years it was said those people down
there at the bottom were single, jobless mothers. For years they were
told
work, education, and marriage is how they move up the economic ladder.
But
poverty is showing up where we didn't expect it -- among families that
include two parents, a worker, and a head of the household with more than
a
high school education. These are the newly poor. Our political,
financial
and business class expects them to climb out of poverty . . on an
escalator
moving downward.
By the end of the decade most Americans were running harder but slipping
behind, and the gap between them and prosperous America was widening.
What turns their personal tragedy into a political travesty is that the
vast
majority of them are very patriotic. They love this country. But they no
longer believe they matter to the people who run the country. Yet, by
the
end of the decade most of them were no longer paying attention to
politics.
They don't see it connecting to their lives. They don't think their
concerns will ever be addressed by the political, cor****ate, and media
elites who make up our dominant class. They are not cynical, because they
are deeply religious people with no capacity for cynicism, but they know
the
system is rigged against them. They know this, and we know this. For
years
now a small fraction of American households have been garnering an extreme
concentration of wealth and income while large cor****ations and financial
institutions have obtained unprecedented levels of economic and political
power over daily life. In 1960, the gap in terms of wealth between the
top
20% and the bottom 20% was 30-fold. Four decades later it is more than
75-fold.
VCRs and television sets are cheap, but higher education, health care,
public trans****tation, drugs, housing and cars have risen faster in price
than typical family incomes. And life has grown neither calm nor secure
for
most Americans, by any means." You can find many sources to sup****t this
conclusion. I like the language of a small outfit here in New York called
the Commonwealth Foundation/Center for the Renewal of American Democracy.
They conclude that working families and the poor "are losing ground under
economic pressures that deeply affect household stability, family
dynamics,
social mobility, political participation, and civic life."
We could prevent the polarization between the very rich and the very poor
that poisoned other societies. We could provide that each and every
citizen
would enjoy the basic necessities of life, a voice in the system of
self-government, and a better chance for their children. We could
preclude
the vast divides that produced the turmoil and tyranny of the very
countries
from which so many of our families had fled.
Historically, through a system of checks and balances we Americans were
going to maintain a safe, if ****fting, equilibrium between wealth and
commonwealth. We believed equitable access to public resources is the
lifeblood of any democracy. So early on, primary schooling was made free
to
all. States changed laws to protect debtors, often the relatively poor,
against their rich creditors. Charters to establish cor****ations were
open
to most, if not all, white comers, rather than held for the elite. The
government encouraged Americans to own their own piece of land, and even
sup****ted squatters' rights. The court challenged monopoly -- all in the
name of we the people.
But then class war was declared, a generation ago, in a powerful polemic
by
William Simon, who was soon to be Secretary of the Treasury. He called on
the financial and business class, in effect, to take back the power and
privileges they had lost in the depression and new deal. They got the
message, and soon they began a stealthy class war against the rest of
society and the principles of our democracy. They set out to trash the
social contract, to cut their workforces and wages, to scour the globe in
search of cheap labor, and to shred the social safety net that was
supposed
to protect people from hard****ps beyond their control. Business Week put
it
bluntly at the time: "Some people will obviously have to do with
less....it
will be a bitter pill for many Americans to swallow the idea of doing with
less so that big business can have more."
The middle class and working poor are told that what's happening to them
is
the consequence of Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand." This is a lie. What's
happening to them is the direct consequence of cor****ate activism,
intellectual propaganda, the rise of a religious orthodoxy that in its
hunger for government subsidies has made an idol of power, and a string of
political decisions favoring the powerful and the privileged who bought
the
political system right out from under us.
Thomas Edsall of The Wa****ngton Post wrote: "During the 1970s, business
refined its ability to act as a class, submerging competitive instincts in
favor of joint, cooperate action in the legislative area." Big business
political action committees flooded the political arena with a deluge of
dollars. And they built alliances with the religious right -- Jerry
Falwell's Moral Majority and Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition -- who
mounted a cultural war providing a smokescreen for the class war, hiding
the
economic plunder of the very people who were enlisted as foot soldiers in
the cause of privilege.
Look at the spoils of victory:
Over the past three years, they've pushed through $2 trillion dollars in
tax
cuts -- almost all tilted towards the wealthiest people in the country.
Cuts in taxes on the largest incomes.
Cuts in taxes on investment income.
And cuts in taxes on huge inheritances.
More than half of the benefits are going to the wealthiest one percent.
You
could call it trickle-down economics, except that the only thing that
trickled down was a sea of red ink in our state and local governments,
forcing them to cut services for and raise taxes on middle class working
America.
Now the Congressional Budget Office forecasts deficits totaling $2.75
trillion over the next ten years.
These deficits have been part of their strategy. Some of you will
remember
that Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan tried to warn us 20 years ago, when
he
predicted that President Ronald Reagan's real strategy was to force the
government to cut domestic social programs by fostering federal deficits
of
historic dimensions. Reagan's own budget director, David Stockman,
admitted
as such. Now the leading rightwing political strategist, Grover Norquist,
says the goal is to "starve the beast" -- with trillions of dollars in
deficits resulting from trillions of dollars in tax cuts, until the United
States Government is so anemic and anorexic it can be drowned in the
bathtub.
There's no question about it: The cor****ate conservatives and their allies
in the political and religious right are achieving a vast transformation
of
American life that only they understand because they are its advocates,
its
architects, and its beneficiaries. In creating the greatest economic
inequality in the advanced world, they have saddled our nation, our
states,
and our cities and counties with structural deficits that will last until
our children's children are ready for retirement, and they are
systematically stripping government of all its functions except rewarding
the rich and waging war.
And they are proud of what they have done to our economy and our society.
If instead of practicing journalism I was writing for Saturday Night Live,
I
couldn't have made up the things that this crew have been saying. The
president's chief economic adviser says ****pping technical and
professional
jobs overseas is good for the economy. The president's Council of
Economic
Advisers re****t that hamburger chefs in fast food restaurants can be
considered manufacturing workers. The president's Federal Reserve
Chairman
says that the tax cuts may force cutbacks in social security - but hey, we
should make the tax cuts permanent anyway. The president's Labor
Secretary
says it doesn't matter if job growth has stalled because "the stock market
is the ultimate arbiter."
You just can't make this stuff up. You have to hear it to believe it.
This
may be the first class war in history where the victims will die laughing.
What we have here is a nationwide scheme to rip off the government and the
poor.
Let's face the reality: If ripping off the public trust; if distributing
tax
breaks to the wealthy at the expense of the poor; if driving the country
into deficits deliberately to starve social benefits; if requiring states
to
balance their budgets on the backs of the poor; if squeezing the wages of
workers until the labor force resembles a nation of serfs -- if this isn't
class war, what is?
It's un-American. It's unpatriotic. And it's wrong.
What we need is a mass movement of people like you. Get mad, yes --
there's
plenty to be mad about. Then get organized and get busy. This is the
fight
of our lives.
From the Wall Street Journal:
"Campaign cash has flooded over the gunwales of the ****p of state and
threatens to sink the entire vessel. Political donations determine the
course and speed of many government actions that deeply affect our daily
lives." Politics is suffocating from the stranglehold of money. During
his
brief campaign in 2000, before he was ambushed by the dirty tricks of the
religious right in South Carolina and big money from George W. Bush's
wealthy elites, John McCain said elections today are nothing less than an
"influence peddling scheme in which both parties compete to stay in office
by selling the country to the highest bidder."
"When powerful interests shower Wa****ngton with millions in campaign
contributions, they often get what they want. But it's ordinary citizens
and firms that pay the price and most of them never see it coming. This
is
what happens if you don't contribute to their campaigns or spend
generously
on lobbying. You pick up a dispro****tionate share of America's tax bill.
You pay higher prices for a broad range of products from peanuts to
prescriptions. You pay taxes that others in a similar situation have been
excused from paying. You're compelled to abide by laws while others are
granted immunity from them. You must pay debts that you incur while
others
do not. You're barred from writing off on your tax returns some of the
money spent on necessities while others deduct the cost of their
entertainment. You must run your business by one set of rules, while the
government creates another set for your competitors. In contrast, the
fortunate few who contribute to the right politicians and hire the right
lobbyists enjoy all the benefits of their special status. Make a bad
business deal; the government bails them out. If they want to hire
workers
at below market wages, the government provides the means to do so. If
they
want more time to pay their debts, the government gives them an extension.
If they want immunity from certain laws, the government gives it. If they
want to ignore rules their competition must comply with, the government
gives its approval. If they want to kill legislation that is intended for
the public, it gets killed."
I'm not quoting from Karl Marx's Das Kapital or Mao's Little Red Book.
I'm
quoting Time magazine. Time's premier investigative journalists -- Donald
Bartlett and James Steele -- concluded in a series last year that America
now has "government for the few at the expense of the many." Economic
inequality begets political inequality, and vice versa.
That's why many Americans are turned off by politics. It's why we're
losing
the balance between wealth and the commonwealth. It's why we can't put
things right. And it is the single most destructive force tearing at the
soul of democracy.
==============
Michael Moore is coverup -- not only does he deliberately eliminate the
best evidence of frame-up, i.e., the Pentagon crash photo evidence of
too-small plane, too-small hole etc. -- he actually backs the official
Pentagon story . Moreover the whole direction of his story is that we
should have gone after Saudi Arabia -- Moore is false opposition -- I
know by the way the man refused even to look at my data or respond to my
letters. Even if his rejection had been sincere, he would have stated his
reasons for discarding evidence that Prof. A. K. Dewdney and all of France
also subscribe to. He has nothing about the thousands who say no Boeing
crashed at the Pentagon. --Dick Eastman
An anonymous email on Michael Moore reached 9/11 truth alliance member and
essayist Kurt Nimmo
"...I ..work in the entertainment industry and thus had the op****tunity to
see Fahrenheit 9/11 at its US premiere, at the Academy theater in Beverly
Hills on June 8th.
....Moore plays directly into the neo-cons' hands because Saudi Arabia is
the jewel in the neo-con crown -- it sets Americans up for the war that he
implies SHOULD have been fought -- against SAUDI ARABIA. As far as I
could tell (and I did take two potty breaks) no mention was made of PNAC,
neoconservatives or the pro-Israel lobbies' driving of the invasion of
Iraq..."
|
