On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 08:52:52 -0700, "senhor san" <dharma@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Conclusive Proof Zionist Neo-cons guilty of 911 Mass-Murder Black-op
>Dick Eastman
>-------------------------------------
>
>I believe our government and society can be cleansed of corruption and
>restored to true sovereign Constitutional representative government by
and
>for the people by simple application of the truth about 911.
>
>Americans need to see the evidence that proves that the attacks on the
>United States, September 11, 2001, was the execution of a plan devised by
>Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle, Kissinger at the Pentagon with of
course
>CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, White House, Mossad, ****n Bet, MI6 and MI5
involvement.
>
>The evidence from the attack on the Pentagon is immediately convincing
and
>conclusive -- although every effort is being made by the perpetrators to
>"neutralize" this information by every possible means.
>
>Here is the evidence:
>
>http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
>
>http://www.911-strike.com/pentagon-all.htm
>
>http://www.globalfreepress.com/ewing2001/911/1.shtml
>
>
>If you will take the trouble to familiarize yourself with this evidence
you
>will then be able to speed the overthrow this usurping conspiracy against
>our Jeffersonian republic by Zionist and secret-society mass-murdering
>economy-plundering organized crime.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Dick Eastman
>223 S. 64th Ave.
>Yakima, Wa****ngton 98908
>U.S.A.
>
>======================
>
>Now that you are free of the grand deception, let's take a little
>educational excursion "outside the matrix:"
>
>------
>Item #1:
>
>From X (mistakenly attrributed to Seymore Hersh last week):
>
>These Israeli citizens came into Iraq disguised as Arab or Kurdish
>civilians, businessmen. Maybe "contractors"? Under contract with the
>Pentagon's neocon office? Your tax dollars at work?
>
>How much of their work is blamed on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? How much of
>Israel's terrorism is blamed on "Al-Qaeda"?
>
>I have investigated the development of the "mujahideen" and here is my
>conclusion:
>
>In the 80's, Israel supervised the recruitment of Arab Afghan
"mujahideen"
>supposedly to fight against Russia. They became cannon fodder and
refugees
>before they ended up in Guantanamo.
>
>THEIR REAL PURPOSE WAS TO HELP ISRAEL CREATE A USEFUL MYTH: AL-QAEDA.
>
>The Arab mujahideen were rather harmless as recent revelations from
>Guantanamo have shown.
>
>Israeli and Jewish-American intelligence specialists were trusted by the
>CIA--Israelis being "allies" and experts on the Middle East--to recruit
the
>Arab "mujahideen" to be used by the US against Russia. Israelis
disguised
>as Arab or Pakistani missionaries (tablighis) even ran the recruitment
>centers. Israelis playing Muslim missionaries (tablighis) were caught in
>India and Israel rushed to retrieve them.
>
>The Arab "mujahideen" themselves were inefficient and almost useless. I
>have heard from the relatives of many who died in vain in clumsy
incidents
>in Afghanistan.
>
>All the Zionists wanted was a story, a myth that would enable them to
>create another myth: "Al Qaeda." The Zionists needed this myth as an
excuse
>for their long-term plans for the "war on terror," a war to destabilze
the
>Middle East and pit the world against Muslims.
>
>Neither Bin Laden nor the Arab refugees he took care of were of any
>military significance. The Afghans themselves were the real efficient
>mujahideen because they knew the territory and the tribal structure. The
>Afghans actually saw the Arabs as nuisance.
>
>Arabs say "nothing comes out of a pot except what's in it." When the
neocon
>liars speak about Arab/Islamic terrorism and Al-Qaeda, they are in fact
>talking about what they themselves are doing. They are talking about
>Israeli covert activities.
>
>No Arabs are involved. Israeli commandos move around using forged or
stolen
>Arab ID's and--if necessary--they wear masks to hide their real
identities,
>such as in beheading videos.
>
>Israelis continue to fake whatever it takes to prove that the "war on
>terror," i.e. the war on Arabs has to continue.
>
>Listen to them more carefully. The Zionists in our midst have been
telling
>us the truth all along. Just replace "Arab" with "Israeli," replace
>"Al-Qaeda" with "Mossad," etc.
>
>===============
>
>Item #2:
>
>
>Dick Eastman responds point-by-point to the 7-19-04 NYT's article "Those
Who
>Were Inspired to Hate the Modern World " by Edward Rothstein:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/10/arts/10CONN.html
>
>> The Western world is decadent. Its emphasis on individualism is
corrupt.
>Its
>materialism is dangerous. Its vision of modernity reflects not progress
but
>regress. The West will destroy itself. But if it doesn't, its destruction
>should be helped along. True salvation can be found only by returning to
>ancient disciplines and beliefs.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: The Western World is decadant with ****ography (a
>Jewish, not an Arab dominated industry, btw, including all the filth
>glutting your inbox); with debt slavery (Islam opposes usury -- ruling
>class Jews live by compound interest and manipulation of the money supply
>through the New York Federal Reserve Bank); Islam IS NOT OPPOSED TO
>INDIVIDUALISM -- the relation****p between each man and the Great Supreme,
>Allah, is personal and individual, and individuals are allowed to own
>property and conduct business and prosper -- as long as they give alms
to
>the poor, do not lie or cheat -- however every billionaire Jew I know
of
>is not an individualist -- he attempts to ruin and enslave the other
>individuals -- he is not a Jeffersonaian Libertarian, but rather an
>Anarcho-capitalist, who masters leveraged buyouts, currency manipulation,
>government destabilion, the engineering of inflations followed by
>depression/deflation that transfers all middle class assets into the
hands
>of the receivers etc. -- ARABS AND ISLAM ARE NOT OPPOSED TO SCIENCE AND
>PROGRESS -- THEY GAVE THESE TO THE WEST -- ALL PHILOSPHY HAS COME FROM
>GREECE THROUGH ARABIC NATIONS, INCLUDING ALGEBRA AND THE 60 MINUTE CLOCK,
>CHEMISTRY, ETC. ] ]
>
>
>Such views may not seem totally unfamiliar. Similar doctrines are held
by
>Islamist terror groups and by those finding common cause with them.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: The view that Western Civilization is dying in
>America is held by the whole world -- it is not only not unfamiliar,
the
>statement is also not unfair and not untrue -- the the extent Moslems
>oppose the destruction of our culture at the hands of merchant bankers,
>cor****ation billionaires and criminals insinuated into high positions in
>govenment for the power of organized (kosher) crime -- to that extent is
>Islam the friend of Western Civilization, indeed of all Civilization
against
>the universal blight of Civilizations!!!! ]
>
>Writers
>like Paul Berman have already shown a connection between Islamist ideas
and
>20th-century Western Fascism, with its own atavistic hatreds of
modernity.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: It takes a lot of brainwa****ng in Ivy League
schools
>for someone to be abstracted from perceptions of the concrete and the
>functional relations among things -- to such a vauge abstruse
semantically
>indefinite and merely emotionally eliticitng a term as "modernism?"
EVERY
>CRIME AGAINST THE WORLD, AND, IN PARTICULAR, AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE
U.S.
>BY A DEVIANT ALIEN-IDEOLOGY ELITE (note: Zionism is Talmudic and
Trotskyite
>and disinformationist Edward Rothstein seems to be practicing it right
>here!) IS THE RESULT OF A CRIMINAL ELITE -- WITH ITS OWN ZIONIST
>VIEW THAT REQUIRES THE DESTRUCTION OF JEFFERSONIAN
>FREEDOM WHICH HAS BEEN THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD
>-- UNTIL SUBVERTED BY THE MORGANS, THE ROCKEFELLERS,
>BARUCH, THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, THE
>TRILATERAL COMMISSION, THE ZIONIST MONOPOLIZATION
>OF MASS MEDIA ETC. )]
>
>
>
>Some of these ideas have emerged on the political left, as well,
appearing
>in
>Marxist thought and inspiring the anti-globalization movement. Their
impact
>on
>the political and religious landscape has been profound.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Edward Rothstein rejects the possibility of
>conspiracy -- governments and bankers and CEOs and politicians are all
>being "up front" -- and anti-globalists and anti-Zionists and
>anti-Conspiracists and populists really just hate progress, and
science,
>and apple pie and motherhood -- that's Rothstein's message -- and every
>sonofa***** I write to will probably eat it up, right?]
>
>But how did such ideas develop? One surprising source turns out to be a
>little-known group of 20th-century European intellectuals. They passed
these
>ideas on to small groups of ardent followers, but their books and
pamphlets
>gradually shaped a worldwide subculture of belief and devotion. Their
>loose-limbed movement, which began in the 1920's, has been called
>traditionalism.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Nonesense!!! Islam breaks all traditions and
>reduces faith to the simplest terms of submission to the Great Supreme
--
>no churches, no rabbi, no big organization -- just respected teachers --
>every man faces god on his own with no intermediary -- only Mohammed
who
>tells/relays to individuals that God is there and what that means. The
>Crusades were a nightmare of horrible Christian crime. The 911
mass-murder
>frame-up by "neo-con" Zionists ("the new con", not what the old "cold
>war con" and ended -- they want to control us with 100 year war against
>terror that does not exist -- but that sonofa***** Edward Rothstein is
>trying to sell us all -- reasons to give up freedom, to submit to
>Wolfowitz-Ridge rule under a succession of dictators all with concealed
>Jewish background (like Kerry, Bush etc.) serving the Jewish-supremacist
>Talmudic premises.]
>
>The pioneers of traditionalism are not well known, but are now the
subject
>of
>a new book by Mark Sedgwick, a historian of Islam who teaches at the
>American
>University in Cairo. He began writing "Against the Modern World:
>Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the 20th Century"
>(Oxford), thinking that it would be a study of Islam in the West, since
many
>traditionalist figures were converts to Islam.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: You want secret history of the 20th Century come
to
>me. I'll tell you about the role of Bernard Baruch -- the origins of
both
>world wars, the great depression, the cold war, the Chinese Communist
>victory, the true power behind communism --right up to the "hidden truth"
>(so far, anyway) of who really was behind the deaths of over 2000 people
on
>Sept. 11, 2001.
>
>But he found that these conversions - many done in secret - were
associated
>with broader religious theories. As he searched Web sites, sought
reluctant
>interviewees and probed an esoteric culture, he also came upon
>traditionalism's intersection with Fascism, the influence of
traditionalism
>on
>American religious studies and the influence of traditionalism on Islamic
>thought.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: When a religion dies it becomes TRADITIONAL --
the
>"mainstream" churches of the US, but more than that ZIONISM is the most
>horrible and insidious of the spiritually dead secret network religions
--
>and neither Edward Rothstein nor Mark Sedgwick will tell you so --
whereas
>living religions -- Islam, the Jehovahs Witnesses ( a monotheisitc
belief
>that, for example, is now the second largest religion in Italy -- going
to
>EVERYONE's door and telling them about the decay of the world system and
the
>need for "the way" of God -- and Jehovah's witnesses do not have clergy
>either, nor to they pass the collection box -- their meeting rooms are
>simply that, meeting rooms etc.] BUT LOOK AT ZIONISM -- ALL TRADITION,
ALL
>CONSPIRACY -- ALL ALIENTATED AND ALIENATING FROM THE CULTURE OF
>FREEDOM THAT WAS SET UP BY JEFFERSON, THOMAS PAINE,
>WA****NGTON, MADISON, PATRICK HENERY -- AND CARRIED
>ON BY JACKSON -- DIED WITH LINCOLN -- BUT SOUGHT TO
>BE REVIVED UNDER WILLIMAM JENNINGS BRYAN AND
>HUEY LONG ETC. -- TRUE JEFFERSONIAN PRINCIPLES
>-- ARE ALIVE AND WELL AND NOT-TRADITIONALIST
>(JEFFERSON CALLED FOR REVOLUTIONS EVERY SO OFTEN
>TO KEEP DYNAMIC FREEDOM ALIVE FOR ALL PEOPLE!!!
>AND THAT IS WHAT RACIST RULING-CLASS EXPLOITATIVE
>ZIONISM HAS ALWAYS OPPOSED -- LOOK AT WHO PAID
>FOR THE BOADTRIP THAT BROUGHT EDWARD ROTHSTEINS
>ANCESTORS TO NEW YORK HARBOR -- BROUGHT HERE
>FOR THE POLITICAL CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY ETC.
>BY THE MORGAN, HARRIMANS AND OTHER ROBBER BARONS
>WITH TIES TO THE EUROPEAN ROTHSCHILDS. From Zionism to
>Skull and Bones -- SECRET TRADIONS are death to Civilization.
>While populism, Islam, freedom, true Sermon on the Mount Christianity
>are not in any way traditional -- but alive and giving life and freedom
and
>a future. And don't let any sonofa***** tell you different.]
>
>
> The careers of its original advocates also turned out to be
>elaborately eccentric: magic and sorcery mixed with Hinduism and Sufism;
>scholar****p mixed with calls for revolution; devotion mixed with cult.
>
>Dick Eastman comment: Oh, yeah? And look at the mysticism of Jew
>Hollywood -- honoring humanity with a long running series in the lives of
>serial killers == Ed Gene, Speck, and now on the video shelf, the first
>woman serial killer, along with THREE DO***ENTARIES ON HER ACCOMPLISHMENT
AT
>BLOCKBUSTER -- but try to find an educational do***entary there to help
>with your homeschooling -- look for a biography of Edison, Jefferson,
Ford,
>or any life that is really worth knowing about and you find NOTHING!!!
>Look at all the supernatural horror movies, and kids movies about the
>super-natural -- what the hell kind of adult mind wants to be filled
with
>Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Hocus Pocus, Sabina etc. -- everything
in
>Jew entertainment media (including mass marketing paperbacks) is socery,
>and magic -- the ZIonist brainwash has taken the naturally engineering
and
>mechanical and inventive Americans and degraded them to superstitious
>peasants seeking terror on film and living in terror and confusion and
>pre-scientific night because of the Jew Zionist aristocracy brainwa****ng
>and dumbing down their "inferiors" -- and Edward Rothstein is just
>injecting everyone with another does of the same deadly and deforming
>medicine.]
>
>Mr. Sedgwick's history of traditionalism, the first scholarly effort by
an
>outsider, also sheds light on contem****ary passions.
>
>Dick Eastman comment: Gee. Is that so? How about the contem****ary
passion
>of psychologically programming boys in your psychological care to enter
>their high school and shoot up their schoolmates -- merely to further a
gun
>confiscation agenda -- soon followed by the exploitation movie by 9-11
>cover-up artist Michael Moore -- how calls for gun confiscation with a
>slick propaganda pice called Bowling for Columbine, while he conducts
>terror -- for that is what it was -- against good man and
>Constitution-believing patriot Charlton Heston. Michael Moore, who
>deliberately blocked out the evidence that proves that 9-11 was a
>ame-up. -- YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME? Well, let us stop right here and
settle
>the matter:
>
>
>Conclusive Proof Zionist Neo-cons guilty
>of 911 Mass-Murder Black-op
>
>I. Pentagon crash evidence proves frame-up, Implicates Pentagon
leader****p
>in black-op
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solidaritystreet/message/2
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
>
>II. Richard Ko****mizu proves the mass-murdering hoax, identifies the
>perpetrators and exposes a long-established conspiracy
>
>http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/meanwhile_j.htm
>
>http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title.htm
>
>http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title2.htm
>
>http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/title3.htm
>
>http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/doc4.htm
>
>http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/doc5.htm
>
>
>
>While the book is flawed by awkward organization and the need for more
>systematic examination of traditionalist ideas,
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: You mean it's a confused mess.]
>
>
>
> it also makes clear how im****tant this neglected movement is.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: You have neglected it hitherto because it is
immently
>worth neglecting, but now you find it im****tant because it fits your
Zionist
>propaganda needs, Edward Rothstein.]
>
>
>
>On his Web site
>(www.traditionalists.org), Mr. Sedgwick lists more than 200
traditionalist
>organizations and Web sites in 34 countries.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Great. So when the Moslems are all murdered you
can
>have the Bush-Kerry tag team go after Catholics and anyone else who has
a
>cache of intellectual traditions that are not under your direct
>mass-psycololgical control. (I wish people realized I am not
exagerating!)
>
>Even the arts now reflect
>traditionalist influence. The British composer, Sir John Tavener, whose
>seven-hour work, "The Veil of the Temple," will receive its United States
>premiere on July 24 as part of the Lincoln Center Festival, writes
religious
>minimalist music and praises traditionalist writers, describing one,
>Firthjof
>Schuon (1907-98), as he "in whose mystical presence I live."
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: And Tavener, the minimalist composer, is helping
>terrorism and Moslems and the death of Western Civilization how?]
>
>
>One of the central do***ents of traditionalism is a relatively brief
book,
>first published in 1927, "The Crisis of the Modern World." Its author,
René
>Guénon (1886-1951), born in Blois, France, to Catholic parents, had been
a
>student of mathematics but soon turned to theosophy, Masonry, medieval
>Christianity, Hinduism and, finally, Islam. Guénon moved to Cairo and
later
>seemed to retreat into solitude, fearing evil sorcery.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: I notice he didn't turn to Judaism, or Zionism,
or
>that extremely traditionalist and ritual and formula dominated cult,
>Communism etc. -- which makes me wonder who is bankrolling his book or
>promting Edward Rothstein to puff it.]
>
>
>His philosophy was, as Mr. Sedgwick acknowledges, "not especially
original."
>But he had a charismatic impact. In the 1920's, Ananda Kentish
Coomaraswamy,
>the curator of the Department of Indian Art at the Boston Museum of Fine
>Arts,
>wrote that "no living writer in modern Europe is more significant" than
>Guénon. In the 1940's, André Gide believed that if he had read Guénon
>earlier,
>his life would have been changed.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: And so how did your essay on Islam and its
attitude
>towards the decline in Western Civilization suddenly fizzle into this
>excursis on Gide (the frog fairy author of L'Imoraliste) -- you drop
the
>chic buzz-topic Guénon but not a word you have said relates it to the
topic
>you started out with -- or are people supposed to have stopped
reading
>after getting down this far, and you are just peppering it with
>high-brow-appeal names in case someone skims the remaining lines -- you
>can't think, you can't write and you can't even lie, Edward Rothstein.]
>
>
>Guénon's argument was that the 20th-century West represented the final
stage
>of a final age, the apotheosis of worldly decadence, in which materialism
>was
>emphasized over the spirit, individuality over community.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: The century it is cannot be a causal factor.
Events
>and past ideas affect subsequent future events and ideas -- but so do
the
>complex and individual histories of given thinkers and actors in history
--
>you and I. IT IS PURE DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM -- e.g., MODERN
TROTSKYISM,
>TO VIEW HISTORY AS A SUCCESSION OF STAGES AND THE FINAL STAGE SOMETHING
>THAT MUST CRASH AND BURN TO MAKE WAY FOR THE BETTER STATE WAITING IN THE
>WINGS. -- The fact is that worldy decadance has causes, it has agents
--
>it results from perverse incentive systems and poor government rewarding
>perversity and anti-productive speculation and cheating and manipulation
of
>markets, and monopoly of production, of information, of education all for
>the interests of the few --
>
>THE ANSWER IS POPULISM -- AND ISLAM IS THE POPULISM OF ASIA AND AFRICA
--
>SADAM AND MOHAMMED OMAR ARE GREAT LEADERS, GREAT MEN, REALLY AND TRULY
>AGAINST THE GREAT SATAN OF ZIONIST AMERICAN GLOBALIZATION. And the fact
>that the Taliban had to fall back on Mideval believes to counter Zionist
>world enslavement, merely shows that the Islamic believes were all he had
in
>his bag of resources with which to intellectually fight back -- do you
>think he knows anyting about Jefferson, Pain, Jackson, Bryan or Huey
>ong? -- ALL FOREIGNERS KNOW ABOUT AMERICA IS WHAT THEY SEE IN JEWISH
>HOLLYWOOD HATE-REAL AMERICA MOVIES -- SERIAL KILLERS, ORGANIZED CRIME,
>MARKETED ***UALITY, EXPLOITATION, VIOLENT "SUPER ACTION" FILMS WITH LOTS
OF
>SADISM AND EXPLOSIONS -- THAT IS WHAT THE JEW ZIONIST WANTS TO MAKE THE
>ONCE FREE AMERICAN -- PSYCOPATHS WHO WILL KILL ON COMMAND, WHO WILL SELL
>BODY AND SOUL ON DEMAND. ]
>
>
>
>The Renaissance, he proposes, was not a rebirth but a death; science,
>rationality and humanism were products of delusion. A cure - or at any
rate,
>a refuge - could be found in the primordial truths that underlay all
>religions before modernity's distortions. Guénon scorned democracy; he
>believed in a hierarchical religious elite and saw himself as one of its
>elect.
>
>
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Ah, here it is!!!! Edward Rothstein says of
Guénon,
>that he does not believe in Democracy (nor even the Representative
>Democracy with limited Goverment given us by Jefferson etc.) -- but
rather,
>" scoringing democracy," favors rule by a hierarchical religious elite"
--
>the light suddenly comes on. Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, Kissinger,
etc.
>are all Zionists, all elite -- and Kerry too is Jewish and
>Zionist --although he hides it in order to get power handed to him by the
>deceived American voters. ROTHSTEIN IS ADVOCATING THAT WESTERN
>CIVILIZATION BE REPLACED BY GUENON'S VISION -- RULE BY ZIONISTS (WHO
ARE
>EXCLUDED FROM THE LISTS OF REACTIONARY TRADITIONALISTS -- WHICH
>TRADITIONALISTS MUST ALL BE ELIMINATED IN THE DELIBERATE DECLINING OF
>WESTERN CIVILIZATION. YES. THAT IS WHAT ROTHSTEIN IS UP TO. -- LET IT
BE
>SAID THAT DICK EASTMAN DIED UNFOOLED AND FIGHTING -- AND MAY IT BE LATER
BE
>SAID THAT I HELPED BRING DOWN THE CONSPIRACY WHICH EDWARD ROTHSTEIN AND
HIS
>ZIONIST LIKE SOUGHT TO PUT OVER ON EVERYBODY.
>
>
>
>He was right about one thing: there was something revolutionary about the
>notion of the individual that developed after the Renaissance.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: The Renaissance was the emergence of the rich
banker
>(Medicis and the Florentines) over both the law and morality of the
culture.
>This system falls short, as does the universal dogmatic priest-ridden
church
>of the dark ages (with the message of Christ still ****ning through
>occasional as with St. Francis etc.) -- Both are pre-Jeffersonain.
Men
>like Rothstein can never be populists -- they deform the idea of
freedom,
>bending it into hypocritical and secretive and destructive progressivism
--
>which under McKinnley andTeddy Roosevelt gave us imperialsim, which under
>Wilson enslaved us with the income tax, the federal reserve system,
direct
>election of (buyable) Senators, and world war one for the profiteers
etc.
>and so forth down through the Baruch dominated New Deal. (I could write
a
>book, if there was an honsest publisher who was his own "individual"
still
>left in the world!!!)
>
>
>
>He was right,
>too, that religious and aesthetic compromises were required in a
democratic
>culture with its beliefs in rights and liberties. But he could not
imagine
>any
>way for a democratic culture of religion to develop: his religious truth
>left
>no room for reason or autonomy. The Reformation, for him, was a
deformation.
>These views are what traditionalism shares with varieties of Islamic
>fundamentalism.
>
>
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Here Rothstein is hinting at the "need" for one
>religion (Zionism in his mind one must assume) to dominate over the rest,
>because they CAN'T GET ALONG under rights and liberties. I am reminded
of
>the Jews who try to stop their children from "assimilating" into
>non-religiousness and breaks with tradition. I am mindful of the
Wolfowtiz
>plan to take over Moslem countries and make detainees out of the
incurable
>"traditionalists" (Guantanamo is the Zionist answer for
>traditionalism" -- remember a Jew (I just put out his name, but am in a
>hurry here) designed Guantanamo containment facilities , and before 911.
>AND NOW JOHN KERRY, WITH MICHAEL MOORE'S PROPAGANDA HELP, WILL NEXT WAGE
WAR
>ON SAUDI ARABI, SO THAT ZIONISTS WILL CONTROL MECCA (COSTING HOW MUCH
>AMERICAN AND BRITISH BLOOD AND HOWEVER MUCH EXTRA BLOOD FROM OTHER
COUNTRIES
>WHO SEND THEIR SONS TO FIGHT BECAUSE THEIR GOVENMENT OR THEY THEMSELVES
>PERSONALLY OWE MORE THAN THEY CAN HOP[E TO PAYBACK AND SO MUST PAY "IN
>KIND."
>
>They are also what led it to flirt with various leader****p cults and,
>ultimately, with Fascism, most obviously in the work of an Italian
>traditionalist, Julius Evola (1898-1974), who was inspired by Guénon.
Evola
>wrote about the Holy Grail, about esoteric belief and magic, but in the
>1920's
>and 30's he tried to influence both Italian Fascism and German Nazism.
Mr.
>Sedgwick suggests that Evola even visited SS headquarters in Germany,
urging
>the organization to supplement its vision with his.
>
>
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Again no mention of Skull and Bones (which ties
>Zionists like Jewish Kerry to Bush and the other organized-crime elites
>steeped in drug trade, *** slavery, and operations like the 9-11
mass-murder
>false-flag frame-up.]
>
>Evola wanted Fascism to be "more radical" and Nazism to be less
bourgeois.
>In
>his 1934 book, "Revolt Against the Modern World," Evola wrote: "What is
>really
>needed is a total catharsis and a radical `housecleaning.' " One method
was
>to
>spur on "the most destructive processes of the modern era." It was a
message
>hailed by right-wing Italian terrorist groups in the 1960's and, in
>different
>ways, by the left-wing terrorists who followed.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Again -- Hitler was infiltrated into the
basically
>populist movement (anti-interest slavery views of Gottfried Feder) while
he
>was working as a spy for the German Army. He made a deal with the
>industrialists and murdered the populists in one night -- and his
>anti-Jewish pogroms (Krystallhacht for example) were merely intended to
>drive Jewish German professionals out of Germany so they could be on hand
to
>give skills to Israel which was then in the making -- the halocaust is
in
>part myth -- although when Hilter invaded Stalin it seems to have been a
>true double cross of the double crossers ...
>
>
>In a less blunt way, such tendencies were even evident in the early work
of
>the Romanian scholar of religion, Mircea Eliade, who was influenced by
both
>Ev
>ola and Guénon in the 1920's and 30's. He later developed what Mr.
Sedgwick
>calls a "soft traditionalism," devoting his career to studying archaic
>religions and their views, an interest that influenced the course of
>academic
>religious studies in the United States.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: Americas problems began when the disastrous
muddled
>and outright anti-scocial and evil thinking of Europeans was brought into
>this country when our colleges began offering doctoral programs -- J.P.
>Morgan was educated at Gottengen, for example -- and suddenly and
Jefferson
>and Paine were replaced by a line of intellectual monsters that I am
sure
>Edward Rothstein can rattle off much better than I.
>
>
>
> But in his earlier traditionalist
>days, when he hailed "a nationalist Romania, frenzied and chauvinistic,"
>Eliade was lured by the attractions of Romanian Fascism and the Iron
Guards,
>a
>past that came to light only after his death in 1986, leaving an
indelible
>blot on his reputation.
>
>[Dick Eastman comment: nothing more worth commenting on -- I should have
>stopped two paragraphs ago. I am sure you all get the point.]
>
>Dick Eastman
>Yakima, Wa****ngton
>
>
>===================
>
>And finally this:
>
>Item #3:
>
>Bill Moyer's makes the case for a populist alternative (since
progressivism
>is a zionist psy-op to undermine true Jeffersonian liberalism-populism.
>This is an astounding summary of the domestic economic situation, not
hidden
>in misleading numbers like GDP (which is anything but a measure of
"growth"
>or "standard of living" or health of the economy) or "the interest
rate"
>(which is really just the rate the Federal Reserve charges to lend to
banks
>so they can afford to get closer to their reserve-requirement constrained
>lending limits -- and has nothing to do with the money supply or the
>availability of credit outside of the international finance loop etc.)
--
>
>but don't let me loose you -- scroll down from here to Bill Moyer's if
are
>in a hurry
>
>-----------------------
>
>as phony as the political party difference between Republicans and
Democrats
>is the ideological difference between conservatism and progressivism
>
>Bill Moyer's -- a miracle of the truth sayer amidst the PBS prostituted
>mouthpieces -- has made it clear how the real populist issues vital to
the
>people of this nation go begging as the world is focused by the Zionist
>media monopoly on the sham causes of the "war on terror," and
>globalization from progressive John Kerry and conservative George W.
Bush.
>
>Take what Bill Moyers has said here and add the hard finding that 9-11
has
>been proven to have been a mass-murder cover-up -- despite the evidence
>covering false-investigations of the Commission, and of Mike Myer's with
>his trivia-revealing limited hangout, and and of over three hundred sites
>with as many inconclusives-centered and established-trivia centered
"worst
>evidence" websites and e-lists all burying the real investigations under
a
>ton of glitz and spam "false-opposition" whose only purpose is to crowd
you
>so you never see the best evidence etc.
>
>Anyway, here is Moyer's most im****tant article (WHICH, IF ANY OF YOU WERE
>REALLY BOTH RATIONAL AND ACTIVIST AT THE SAME TIME) should cause you too
>seek a real populist alternative to Kerry-Bush-Nader.
>
>Dick Eastman
>Yakima
>Bill Moyers: "This is the Fight of Our Lives"
>
>--------
>
>Excerpts from Bill Moyers' keynote speech at New York University, "This
is
>the Fight of Our Lives," delivered on June 3, 2004.
>
>
>
>Read the rest of it at: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0616-09.htm
>
>
>
>"Nothing seems to embarrass the political class in Wa****ngton today. Not
>the fact that more children are growing up in poverty in America than in
any
>other industrial nation; not the fact that millions of workers are
actually
>making less money today in real dollars than they did twenty years ago;
not
>the fact that working people are putting in longer and longer hours and
>still falling behind; not the fact that while we have the most advanced
>medical care in the world, nearly 44 million Americans -- eight out of
ten
>of them in working families -- are uninsured and cannot get the basic
care
>they need.
>
>
>
>Astoni****ng as it seems, no one in official Wa****ngton seems embarrassed
by
>the fact that the gap between rich and poor is greater than it's been in
50
>years -- the worst inequality among all western nations. Or that we are
>experiencing a ****ft in poverty. For years it was said those people down
>there at the bottom were single, jobless mothers. For years they were
told
>work, education, and marriage is how they move up the economic ladder.
But
>poverty is showing up where we didn't expect it -- among families that
>include two parents, a worker, and a head of the household with more than
a
>high school education. These are the newly poor. Our political,
financial
>and business class expects them to climb out of poverty . . on an
escalator
>moving downward.
>
>
>
>By the end of the decade most Americans were running harder but slipping
>behind, and the gap between them and prosperous America was widening.
>
>
>
>What turns their personal tragedy into a political travesty is that the
vast
>majority of them are very patriotic. They love this country. But they
no
>longer believe they matter to the people who run the country. Yet, by
the
>end of the decade most of them were no longer paying attention to
politics.
>They don't see it connecting to their lives. They don't think their
>concerns will ever be addressed by the political, cor****ate, and media
>elites who make up our dominant class. They are not cynical, because
they
>are deeply religious people with no capacity for cynicism, but they know
the
>system is rigged against them. They know this, and we know this. For
years
>now a small fraction of American households have been garnering an
extreme
>concentration of wealth and income while large cor****ations and financial
>institutions have obtained unprecedented levels of economic and political
>power over daily life. In 1960, the gap in terms of wealth between the
top
>20% and the bottom 20% was 30-fold. Four decades later it is more than
>75-fold.
>
>
>
>
>
>VCRs and television sets are cheap, but higher education, health care,
>public trans****tation, drugs, housing and cars have risen faster in price
>than typical family incomes. And life has grown neither calm nor secure
for
>most Americans, by any means." You can find many sources to sup****t this
>conclusion. I like the language of a small outfit here in New York
called
>the Commonwealth Foundation/Center for the Renewal of American Democracy.
>They conclude that working families and the poor "are losing ground under
>economic pressures that deeply affect household stability, family
dynamics,
>social mobility, political participation, and civic life."
>
>
>
>We could prevent the polarization between the very rich and the very poor
>that poisoned other societies. We could provide that each and every
citizen
>would enjoy the basic necessities of life, a voice in the system of
>self-government, and a better chance for their children. We could
preclude
>the vast divides that produced the turmoil and tyranny of the very
countries
>from which so many of our families had fled.
>
>
>
>Historically, through a system of checks and balances we Americans were
>going to maintain a safe, if ****fting, equilibrium between wealth and
>commonwealth. We believed equitable access to public resources is the
>lifeblood of any democracy. So early on, primary schooling was made free
to
>all. States changed laws to protect debtors, often the relatively poor,
>against their rich creditors. Charters to establish cor****ations were
open
>to most, if not all, white comers, rather than held for the elite. The
>government encouraged Americans to own their own piece of land, and even
>sup****ted squatters' rights. The court challenged monopoly -- all in the
>name of we the people.
>
>
>
>
>
>But then class war was declared, a generation ago, in a powerful polemic
by
>William Simon, who was soon to be Secretary of the Treasury. He called
on
>the financial and business class, in effect, to take back the power and
>privileges they had lost in the depression and new deal. They got the
>message, and soon they began a stealthy class war against the rest of
>society and the principles of our democracy. They set out to trash the
>social contract, to cut their workforces and wages, to scour the globe in
>search of cheap labor, and to shred the social safety net that was
supposed
>to protect people from hard****ps beyond their control. Business Week put
it
>bluntly at the time: "Some people will obviously have to do with
less....it
>will be a bitter pill for many Americans to swallow the idea of doing
with
>less so that big business can have more."
>
>
>
>The middle class and working poor are told that what's happening to them
is
>the consequence of Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand." This is a lie. What's
>happening to them is the direct consequence of cor****ate activism,
>intellectual propaganda, the rise of a religious orthodoxy that in its
>hunger for government subsidies has made an idol of power, and a string
of
>political decisions favoring the powerful and the privileged who bought
the
>political system right out from under us.
>
>
>
>Thomas Edsall of The Wa****ngton Post wrote: "During the 1970s, business
>refined its ability to act as a class, submerging competitive instincts
in
>favor of joint, cooperate action in the legislative area." Big business
>political action committees flooded the political arena with a deluge of
>dollars. And they built alliances with the religious right -- Jerry
>Falwell's Moral Majority and Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition -- who
moun
>ted a cultural war providing a smokescreen for the class war, hiding the
>economic plunder of the very people who were enlisted as foot soldiers in
>the cause of privilege.
>
>
>
>
>
>Look at the spoils of victory:
>
>
>
>Over the past three years, they've pushed through $2 trillion dollars in
tax
>cuts -- almost all tilted towards the wealthiest people in the country.
>
>
>
>Cuts in taxes on the largest incomes.
>
>
>
>Cuts in taxes on investment income.
>
>
>
>And cuts in taxes on huge inheritances.
>
>
>
>More than half of the benefits are going to the wealthiest one percent.
You
>could call it trickle-down economics, except that the only thing that
>trickled down was a sea of red ink in our state and local governments,
>forcing them to cut services for and raise taxes on middle class working
>America.
>
>
>
>Now the Congressional Budget Office forecasts deficits totaling $2.75
>trillion over the next ten years.
>
>
>
>These deficits have been part of their strategy. Some of you will
remember
>that Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan tried to warn us 20 years ago, when
he
>predicted that President Ronald Reagan's real strategy was to force the
>government to cut domestic social programs by fostering federal deficits
of
>historic dimensions. Reagan's own budget director, David Stockman,
admitted
>as such. Now the leading rightwing political strategist, Grover
Norquist,
>says the goal is to "starve the beast" -- with trillions of dollars in
>deficits resulting from trillions of dollars in tax cuts, until the
United
>States Government is so anemic and anorexic it can be drowned in the
>bathtub.
>
>
>
>
>
>There's no question about it: The cor****ate conservatives and their
allies
>in the political and religious right are achieving a vast transformation
of
>American life that only they understand because they are its advocates,
its
>architects, and its beneficiaries. In creating the greatest economic
>inequality in the advanced world, they have saddled our nation, our
states,
>and our cities and counties with structural deficits that will last until
>our children's children are ready for retirement, and they are
>systematically stripping government of all its functions except rewarding
>the rich and waging war.
>
>
>
>And they are proud of what they have done to our economy and our society.
>If instead of practicing journalism I was writing for Saturday Night
Live, I
>couldn't have made up the things that this crew have been saying. The
>president's chief economic adviser says ****pping technical and
professional
>jobs overseas is good for the economy. The president's Council of
Economic
>Advisers re****t that hamburger chefs in fast food restaurants can be
>considered manufacturing workers. The president's Federal Reserve
Chairman
>says that the tax cuts may force cutbacks in social security - but hey,
we
>should make the tax cuts permanent anyway. The president's Labor
Secretary
>says it doesn't matter if job growth has stalled because "the stock
market
>is the ultimate arbiter."
>
>
>
>
>You just can't make this stuff up. You have to hear it to believe it.
This
>may be the first class war in history where the victims will die
laughing.
>
>
>
>What we have here is a nationwide scheme to rip off the government and
the
>poor.
>
>
>
>Let's face the reality: If ripping off the public trust; if distributing
tax
>breaks to the wealthy at the expense of the poor; if driving the country
>into deficits deliberately to starve social benefits; if requiring states
to
>balance their budgets on the backs of the poor; if squeezing the wages of
>workers until the labor force resembles a nation of serfs -- if this
isn't
>class war, what is?
>
>
>
>It's un-American. It's unpatriotic. And it's wrong.
>
>
>
>What we need is a mass movement of people like you. Get mad, yes --
there's
>plenty to be mad about. Then get organized and get busy. This is the
fight
>of our lives.
>
>
>
>
>
>From the Wall Street Journal:
>
>
>
>"Campaign cash has flooded over the gunwales of the ****p of state and
>threatens to sink the entire vessel. Political donations determine the
>course and speed of many government actions that deeply affect our daily
>lives." Politics is suffocating from the stranglehold of money. During
his
>brief campaign in 2000, before he was ambushed by the dirty tricks of the
>religious right in South Carolina and big money from George W. Bush's
>wealthy elites, John McCain said elections today are nothing less than an
>"influence peddling scheme in which both parties compete to stay in
office
>by selling the country to the highest bidder."
>
>
>
>"When powerful interests shower Wa****ngton with millions in campaign
>contributions, they often get what they want. But it's ordinary citizens
>and firms that pay the price and most of them never see it coming. This
is
>what happens if you don't contribute to their campaigns or spend
generously
>on lobbying. You pick up a dispro****tionate share of America's tax bill.
>You pay higher prices for a broad range of products from peanuts to
>prescriptions. You pay taxes that others in a similar situation have
been
>excused from paying. You're compelled to abide by laws while others are
>granted immunity from them. You must pay debts that you incur while
others
>do not. You're barred from writing off on your tax returns some of the
>money spent on necessities while others deduct the cost of their
>entertainment. You must run your business by one set of rules, while the
>government creates another set for your competitors. In contrast, the
>fortunate few who contribute to the right politicians and hire the right
>lobbyists enjoy all the benefits of their special status. Make a bad
>business deal; the government bails them out. If they want to hire
workers
>at below market wages, the government provides the means to do so. If
they
>want more time to pay their debts, the government gives them an
extension.
>If they want immunity from certain laws, the government gives it. If
they
>want to ignore rules their competition must comply with, the government
>gives its approval. If they want to kill legislation that is intended
for
>the public, it gets killed."
>
>
>
>I'm not quoting from Karl Marx's Das Kapital or Mao's Little Red Book.
I'm
>quoting Time magazine. Time's premier investigative journalists --
Donald
>Bartlett and James Steele -- concluded in a series last year that America
>now has "government for the few at the expense of the many." Economic
>inequality begets political inequality, and vice versa.
>
>
>
>That's why many Americans are turned off by politics. It's why we're
losing
>the balance between wealth and the commonwealth. It's why we can't put
>things right. And it is the single most destructive force tearing at the
>soul of democracy.
>
>
>
>==============
>
>
>
>Michael Moore is coverup -- not only does he deliberately eliminate the
>best evidence of frame-up, i.e., the Pentagon crash photo evidence of
>too-small plane, too-small hole etc. -- he actually backs the official
>Pentagon story . Moreover the whole direction of his story is that we
>should have gone after Saudi Arabia -- Moore is false opposition -- I
>know by the way the man refused even to look at my data or respond to my
>letters. Even if his rejection had been sincere, he would have stated
his
>reasons for discarding evidence that Prof. A. K. Dewdney and all of
France
>also subscribe to. He has nothing about the thousands who say no Boeing
>crashed at the Pentagon. --Dick Eastman
>
>
>
>An anonymous email on Michael Moore reached 9/11 truth alliance member
and
>essayist Kurt Nimmo
>
>"...I ..work in the entertainment industry and thus had the op****tunity
to
>see Fahrenheit 9/11 at its US premiere, at the Academy theater in Beverly
>Hills on June 8th.
>...Moore plays directly into the neo-cons' hands because Saudi Arabia is
>the jewel in the neo-con crown -- it sets Americans up for the war that
he
>implies SHOULD have been fought -- against SAUDI ARABIA. As far as I
>could tell (and I did take two potty breaks) no mention was made of PNAC,
>neoconservatives or the pro-Israel lobbies' driving of the invasion of
>Iraq..."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I want to suck your cock!
|
