1) Silverstein pulled Building #7 with people in the streets who had
already
suffered considerable stress to their respiratory systems and other damage
from toxins in the air from the collapse of the twin towers. He added by
a
considerable amount of deleterious air-born debris (taking Building #7 as
a
fraction of the total weight or volume of buildings collapsed) -- the
intentional demolition of Building 7 has been established and it is
inconceivable that Silverstein would not have been in on that decision.
No
agreement that the distressed families may have signed in order to get aid
can hold up against the victims and the families of dead or incapacitated
victims whose condition was contributed to by what must have been Mr.
SIlverstein's deliberate act.
Now that I have said it -- I think its OK for everyone to start saying it
too.
2.) It's time for a terminological innovation.
Here are two terms people have been using to catagorize "conspiracy
theories" of 911 (Nico Haupt originated these terms I think):
LIHOP -- Let it (911) happen on purpose
MIHOP -- Made it (911) happen on purpose
Of course if MIHOP is true, then LIHOP must be true.
But this distinction is worthless unless there exists in the evidence a
means of testing for MIHOP. Bombs planted in the WTC do not implicate the
government. Remote-control guided planes do not implicate the government.
Private business flying behind doomed ariliners in New York and
Pennsylvania
do not implicate the government. Only one body of evidence is claimed to
implicate the government in MIHOP, and that is the Pentagon crash
evidence.
And no body of evidence has more big name and big budget investigators
attacking it than the Pentagon evidence. Almost any other theory gets
full
exposure and is puffed on multitude of sites, with a new theory coming
out
just as an old one is discredited or grows stale because can't be proved
or
disproved. But this is strange, because according an accepted principle
of
science that theory is best which has been been most tested, has withstood
the most comprehensive attempts to refute it and which explains the most
or
fits the best to all that is known -- that is a source of clues fruitful
in
yielding more confirmable information. This has been the case with the
evidence that yields the conclusion and only the conclusion that a smaller
aircraft, armed with a missile, was responsible for the attack on the
Pentagon and that the Boeing overflew the Pentagon as the flash,
explosion,
and fire concealed its "smoke and mirrors" disappearing act.
Now the critical question I wish to ask here is why does the Pentaqon
evidence meet resistance that the lightweight and easily discredited
fly-by-night explanations never meet? The answer has to do with the
implications of who it is that the Pentagon evidence exactly fingers.
Unlike all the other theories, unlike all the other forms of evidence --
the
Pentagon evidence implicates the Pentagon leader****p, it implicates Donald
Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Henry Kissinger, Newt Gingrich,
Gen. Myers, Feith and half a dozen others as key strategists and
participants in the false-flag mass-murder frame-up.
And so I propose we eliminate the not-very-helpful terms "LIHOP" and
"MIHOP"
and replace them with these:
PIEZAG: Pentagon is everything -- Zionists are guilty.
PINADI: Pentagon is nothing -- Arabs did it.
Here is a knife that cuts to the quick. Instantly every big name
investigator is catagorized in the most im****tant way.
And the fact of the matter is that people who follow the best evidence
where-ever who are shown the Pentagon evidence are always evenutally
persuaded.
While people who receive nice checks from wealthy establishment
contributors -- always refuse even to consider or to share the Pentagon
evidence with their readers -- even working to form high-profile
organizations whose founding charter specifically proscribes the Pentagon
evidence as "a waste of time" or "irresponsible."
Rather than me once again listing who these soi-disant investigators are,
I
instead give you the tools, PIEZAG and PINADI and let you investigate the
investigators yourselves. I do not think it will take you long to see the
im****tance of these two catagories in making sense of who is really
investigating the truth and who is not and why they are not.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Wa****gnton
Every man is responsible to every other man.
p.s. See for yourself - The Pentagon evidence is really more than ample
and wholly incontestable:
Proof of 9-11 frame-up -- the Pentagon 911 evidence:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/8
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/3
http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/507
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message/38
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm
http://www.911-strike.com/pentagon-all.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1
|
