Talk About Network

Google





Government > Homosexual Issues > Re: An interest...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 5 Topic 2129 of 2406
Post > Topic >>

Re: An interesting note

by No One <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 13, 2008 at 01:24 PM

"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> "Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:zVx4k.7979$jI5.7038@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:Box4k.10620$IK1.7383@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> On Gay Marriage.
> >> San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera called Liberty Counsel's
> >> filing "absurd."
> >>
> >> "I am not aware of a process in American law that enables parties
> >> to effectively appeal a higher court ruling to a lower court,"
> >> Herrera said.
> >>
> >> http://www.365gay.com/Newscon08/06/061208cal
> >
> > They're desperate.
> 
> Maybe desperately trying to find a court stacked with 'their' type
> judges.....A favourite Bigot Trick
> 
> If the judgement goes there way, they say the judges are fair, if not
> then they say the judges are activists.

It gets even funnier.  Maybe the Virginia-based Liberty Counsel, the
outfit that filed the petition, would be willing to help two lesbians
in Rhode Island:

 
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/13/MNU51187I2.DTL>.

It seems that two lesbians were married in Massachusetts and now want
to get divorced and there were legal problems:

        The Rhode Island Supreme Court last year ruled that the
        state's family court could not grant a divorce to Margaret
        Chambers and Cassandra Ormiston, who wed in 2004 in
        Massachusetts soon after same-*** marriage became legal in
        that state.

        The justices said the state statute that created the family
        court recognized marriage as between only a man and a woman
        and the court, therefore, could not divorce a same-*** couple.

        Chambers then sought a divorce in Superior Court. Judge
        Patricia Hurst denied the request on Wednesday, saying her
        court does not have jurisdiction to handle divorce.

        But she also questioned the constitutionality of the statute
        relied on last year by the Supreme Court.

        "It seems to me that this is a matter needing immediate
        attention and one that very plainly belongs in the hands of
        the legislature and the executive branch," Hurst said.

So, if the Virginia-based Liberty Counsel doesn't like same-***
marriages, it should be in favor of helping these two lesbians undo
their marriage.  We'll see if the Virginia-based Liberty Counsel
follows through on its stated convictions. :-)
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
An interesting note
"RamRod Sword of Baa  2008-06-13 16:38:57 
Re: An interesting note
"Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-06-13 09:49:37 
Re: An interesting note
"RamRod Sword of Baa  2008-06-13 19:13:22 
Re: An interesting note
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-13 13:24:08 
Re: An interesting note
anonymous <anonymous@[  2008-06-15 06:35:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 17:41:24 PST 2009.