"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <dwayne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1215067643_411732@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:jdFak.16458$IK1.1200@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Remember a couple of weeks ago where Herr Riske made the sweeping
>> statement
>> {It is a known fact proved by peer-review scientific research that a
>> homo***ual is *more likely* to be a pedophile.}
>>
>> Several people here including myself asked him to give us the URL of
his
>> peer-review, so far he has dodged and has not come back with anything.
>>
>> Where I gave him several URLs showing he was wrong.
>> Could it be that once again he has been caught out telling lies.
>
> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431
>
> http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_SPECRPT_pedo-sum.html
>
> http://www.section21.m6.net/prf-activism.php
>
> I figure, if the shoe fits, wear it. In the latter of the above links,
I
> don't see hetero***uals as the primary promoter of pedophilia's rights.
Now let me see, I posted official Government figures from various sources,
6
State *** Registries and Dept of Justice, and you come back with
references
from red hot right wing organizations. what a joke.
Your first reference
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431
First. Herr Riske stated "peer-review scientific research " and the
twisted
WorldNutDaily says "Soon to be published by Regent University Law Review"
This has NOT been published.
Incidentally what Steve Balwin's qualification???????
BTW this great re****t by Steve Balwin was soon to be published in 2002 as
well as in 2008.... God knows how much earlier it also was 'soon to be
published' :-)
See
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.solutions/msg/17dd9f24e9fff3eb\\
Baldwin is the executive director of the Council for National Policy, one
of
whose founders was Tim LaHaye, an evangelical preacher who was then the
head
of the Moral Majority at the time. Funny how all these red hot right wing
organizations keep popping up in your quotes. No independent experts, just
the same old groups that we have found over the years cannot lay straight
in
bed.
Of course the article also quoted the darling of the bigot world, Dr.
Judith
Reisman, who the US Justice Department had given Reisman a grant for
$734,371 to study pictures in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler.
It was a scientific disaster, riddled with researcher bias and baseless
assumptions. The American University (AU), where Reisman's study had been
academically based, actually refused to publish it when she released it.
See
http://libertus.net/censor/rdocs/xrhoax7.html
--------------------
Next reference
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_SPECRPT_pedo-sum.html
It seems that Blanchard, Barbareee, Bogaert, Dicky, Klassen, Kuban, and
Zucker, are not particularly well know, as a search for them on Google
only
found 4 entries, and of those 4, 2 were by that well known right wing
organisation that is famous for its anti gay stance, the Family Research
Institute. The other 2 were not in English.
This reference is by the Family Research Institute is run by Dr Paul
Cameron
who was dropped from the APA because of for non-cooperation with an ethics
investigation
His work has been criticized for alleged misrepresentation of data by the
American Sociological Association and Canadian Psychological Association
Quite interesting is that he stated to group at the University of Nebraska
that a 4 years old child had been brutally ***ually molested by
homo***uals,
Police were unable to confirm the incident, and Cameron acknowledged that
he
had only heard the story as a rumour.
So much for the scientific facts from Paul Cameron.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Cameron
---------
Nebraska Psychological Association adopted a resolution stating that it
"formally disassociates itself from the representations and
interpretations
of scientific literature offered by Dr. Paul Cameron in his writings and
public statements on ***uality."
The American Sociological Association officially and publicly states that
Paul Cameron is not a sociologist, and condemns his consistent
misrepresentation of sociological research. Information on this action and
a
copy of the re****t by the Committee on the Status of Homo***uals in
Sociology, "The Paul Cameron Case," is to be published in Footnotes, and
be
sent to the officers of all regional and state sociological associations
and
to the Canadian Sociological Association with a request that they alert
their members to Cameron's frequent lecture and media appearances
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/HTML/facts_cameron_sheet.html
---------------------------
Third reference
http://www.section21.m6.net/prf-activism.php
Sorry not really sure what this has to do with the statement of Herr Riske
{It is a known fact proved by peer-review scientific research that a
homo***ual is *more likely* to be a pedophile.}
Yes there are paedophile organizations, and personally I am against
children
under the age of consent having *** with adults. I do agree with the so
called Romeo and Juliet laws that permit as a defence young people of
similar ages who are caught having ***, so that the full weight of the law
is not brought down on them.
In the above article it seems to be only interested in male to male ***,
it
is known that there are similar organisations that hetero***ual use to
gain
information about children. One is called rose petals or something
similar.
These are just as bad as NAMBLA IMHO.
======================
Now back to basics, it would seem that you can only quote references from
right wing organizations that do not seem to have any real scientific
knowledge, only hatred for Gay people. If what Herr Riske said is correct,
then you should have no problems quoting a few official Government source,
or something from the AMA, APA the Lancet that proves his statement.
So far it seems he cannot back up his words.........
|
