"James Riske" <james.riske@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:20080706142537.bc5db15f.james.riske@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:35:52 GMT
> "RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "James Riske" <james.riske@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:20080706094003.5c76fc78.james.riske@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:51:10 GMT
>> > "RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "Wayne H. Wilhelm" <dwayne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> news:1215067643_411732@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > "RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> > news:jdFak.16458$IK1.1200@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Remember a couple of weeks ago where Herr Riske made the sweeping
>> >> >> statement
>> >> >> {It is a known fact proved by peer-review scientific research
that
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> homo***ual is *more likely* to be a pedophile.}
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Several people here including myself asked him to give us the URL
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> his
>> >> >> peer-review, so far he has dodged and has not come back with
>> >> >> anything.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Where I gave him several URLs showing he was wrong.
>> >> >> Could it be that once again he has been caught out telling lies.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_SPECRPT_pedo-sum.html
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.section21.m6.net/prf-activism.php
>> >> >
>> >> > I figure, if the shoe fits, wear it. In the latter of the above
>> >> > links,
>> >> > I
>> >> > don't see hetero***uals as the primary promoter of pedophilia's
>> >> > rights.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Now let me see, I posted official Government figures from various
>> >> sources, 6
>> >> State *** Registries and Dept of Justice
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> >
>> > Which of course have absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that a
>> > faggot is more likely to be a pedophile.
>> >
>> > Why don't you try this on for size faggot?
>> >
>> > http://www.homo***info.org/***uality/Pedophilia
>>
>>
>> And that is your 'peer-review scientific research', what a joke.
>>
>> It is on a par with your looney mate "The Amazing Foon-hoon"
>
>
> Now that you mention it the author does in fact draw his findings from
> the peer-reviewed scientific database.
The Author, seems to have forgotten to put his name to his 'peer-review
scientific research' Ha Ha, you really are a joke.
Want to try again,
|
