Re: Californians seem to like the idea of Gay Marriage

In article <87abgh57o6.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 No One <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Tim May <timcmay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
> > My company exercises its First Amendment rights of free association:
it 
> > does not hire anyone thought to be a queer, a homo***ual, a fag, a 
> > lesbian, etc. Member****p in LAMBDA or any of the campus fag groups is 
> > used to screen out college applicants.
> > 
> > It's still a free country, despite what Obamanation and Billary claim.
> > 
> > (We might hire a qualified negro, but the last one I worked with was
in 
> > 1981. Incompetent, but, still, the last one. They just don't like
math, 
> > science, and engineering. "Reading be fo' whitey!" doesn't get them
very 
> > far in technology.)
> 
> Odd that you are posting this to ba.general, with got.net being in
> SantaCruz.  Perhaps you'd care to post what your company's name is.
> Then LAMDA and the NAACP can join forces and educate you people about
> the Unruh Civil Rights Act. :-)

"got.net" can kiss my ass. 

They tried 13 years ago to "rein in" my free opinions.

They gave up. Despite what the fags and niggers say, we are free to not 
hire fags and niggers.

Even "got.net" has that right, though they (still) think they have to 
hire quotas of queers, transgenders, muds, dirt people, and lesbians.

If you disagree, contact me. I'm in the phone book.

But, of course, if you trespass, I'll shoot your faggoty ass.

It's why we have guns, even assault rifles. 

Forty million of you muds need a trip up the chimneys.


--Tim May