Re: Californians seem to like the idea of Gay Marriage

On Jul 16, 10:18=A0pm, Tim May <timc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <2008071622351516807-v7xrt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> =A04square <v7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Your reply is the essence of paranoia.
>
> > You are so serious about this obsession of yours and we can only
wonder
> > why. Why is this thing in which you force yourself to joist with
> > alleged socks of some unknown and unidentifiable ghost on the Usenet
> > taking up such a large ****tion of your life? You claim to have been
> > tracking (or is it stalking?) this unidentified entity for more than
> > five years...WHY? What's your point? What have your accomplished or
> > gained. As a matter of fact I appear to be the only one who even takes
> > the time to read your disillusioned post and I only do it out of
morbid
> > curiosity about the marginal paranoid brain.
>
> My company exercises its First Amendment rights of free association: it
> does not hire anyone thought to be a queer, a homo***ual, a fag, a
> lesbian, etc. Member****p in LAMBDA or any of the campus fag groups is
> used to screen out college applicants.

You yourself have said that any employer who expects you to submit to
a pre-employment drug screen has "earned killing." How is refusing to
hire a person based on their drug use while not at work any different
than refusing to hire them based on their ***ual activities while not
at work?