On May 5, 7:06=A0am, duke <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 May 2008 11:19:08 -0700 (PDT), Emerson Wainwright
>
> <emersonwainwri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> 1. =A0The demonstrated purpose of the ***ual act is procreation.
> >This has not been demonstrated. =A0The fact that some ***ual acts
result
> >in conception doesn't indicate that the only purpose for *** is
> >procreation.
>
> God put 1/2 the procreation equation in man (sperm) and 1/2 in woman
(egg)=
.. =A0And
> they had their first date via mutually shaped organs stimulated by a
highl=
y
> sensitive joyous pleasure. =A0 Take out the climax and go to a ball
game.
I have no idea what you're trying to argue here. I THINK you're
trying to say that your god created humans to be so stupid that if he
didn't make *** pleasurable, man would rather watch a ball game than
continue the human species.
> >Let's do a little substitution with your premise: =A0The demonstrated
> >purpose of the ***ual act is to spread ***ually transmitted diseases
> >(because some ***ual encounters result in the spread of STDs).
>
> And where did the std come from if not climax driven?
You'll have to ask your god, who created the little buggers. Climaxes
do not cause STDs.
> >The reality is that the vast majority of ***ual encounters do NOT
> >result in conception, even when conception is the goal!
>
> Take out climax and there won't be any conception.
Not true these days. Sperm can be harvested without ejaculation. And
women have never needed to climax in order to conceive.
Take out ***ual behaviors and there will be no STDs.
|
