Christ's Love wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 03:33:14 -0400, Cory Albrecht
> <coryalbrecht@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Christ's Love wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:25:19 -0400, Cory Albrecht
>>> <coryalbrecht@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Christ's Love wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 05:39:09 -0700 (PDT), Emerson Wainwright
>>>>> <emersonwainwright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> On May 7, 12:16 am, Christ's Love <christsag...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> No, John, and I'm sorry for you that you have such a warped little
>>>>>>> mind that you can't accept God's truth. Homo***uality is contrary
to
>>>>>>> His word, and so is evolution.
>>>>>> So is the earth revolving around the sun.
>>>>> Where have you been for the past hundred years, Mr. Wainwright?
>>>>> From Copernicus until Einstein, atheists gloated on this same
>>>>> misunderstanding you have until Einstein proved that it's just as
>>>>> correct to say the sun revolves around the earth as vice versa.
>>>> Liar. Einstein never proved any such thing. If you think he did,
please
>>>> prove it by direct usage of General and Special Relativity. Also,
show
>>>> your steps - how you derived the necessary equations and the values
you
>>>> used in them.
>>> Too bad you're also a moron, Cory. He did indeed. Read my reply to
>>> your crony no one.
>> Weren't you the one who was complaining about ad hominems from Budikka?
>
> Calling a moron a "moron" is not an ad hominem, but just a statement
> of fact, Cory. :)
>
>> If I am wrong then it should be trivially easy for you to either cite
>> where in Einstein's writing he said that relativity means say the Sun
>> orbits the Earth is correct.
>>
>
> I never said that. What I did say was that Einstein showed that it's
> just as accurate to say the sun revolves about the earth as it is to
Then you should be able to produce a citation where Einstein showed this.
> say the earth revolves about the sun. There is no absolute stable
> reference from which we can declare absolute motions, Cory.
Not a a universal scale, no, but two objects can share an inertial
reference frame. The well known Twin Paradox explains this
>
> I suggest that you read a few books on basic science and then get back
> to us, Cory. :)
Considering that I already utterly debunked your claim that Special
Relativity show your claim, I suggest that it is you who needs to read a
few books on basic science.
>> Or it should be trivially easy for you you to use Einstein's equations
>> to prove this to me.
> It is indeed easy enough to prove from Einstein's postulates. Are you
> really a moron, Cory, or do you just play one on TV?
If it is so easy to do, then why don't you do so? Probably because you
can;t actually do it,as I have already shown, elsewhere. The fact that
you don't provide proof means that your reply is an ad hominem. Yet more
evidence of your hypocrisy.
|
