On 11 May, 04:07, RedDog <craigchil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 10, 2:27 pm, Cory Albrecht <coryalbre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Christ's Love wrote:
> > > On Sat, 10 May 2008 03:33:14 -0400, Cory Albrecht
> > > <coryalbre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> Christ's Love wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:25:19 -0400, Cory Albrecht
> > >>> <coryalbre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >>>> Christ's Love wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, 7 May 2008 05:39:09 -0700 (PDT), Emerson Wainwright
> > >>>>> <emersonwainwri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On May 7, 12:16 am, Christ's Love <christsag...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>> No, John, and I'm sorry for you that you have such a warped
little
> > >>>>>>> mind that you can't accept God's truth. Homo***uality is
contrary to
> > >>>>>>> His word, and so is evolution.
> > >>>>>> So is the earth revolving around the sun.
> > >>>>> Where have you been for the past hundred years, Mr. Wainwright?
> > >>>>> From Copernicus until Einstein, atheists gloated on this same
> > >>>>> misunderstanding you have until Einstein proved that it's just
as
> > >>>>> correct to say the sun revolves around the earth as vice versa.
> > >>>> Liar. Einstein never proved any such thing. If you think he did,
please
> > >>>> prove it by direct usage of General and Special Relativity. Also,
show
> > >>>> your steps - how you derived the necessary equations and the
values you
> > >>>> used in them.
> > >>> Too bad you're also a moron, Cory. He did indeed. Read my reply to
> > >>> your crony no one.
> > >> Weren't you the one who was complaining about ad hominems from
Budikka?
>
> > > Calling a moron a "moron" is not an ad hominem, but just a statement
> > > of fact, Cory. :)
>
> > >> If I am wrong then it should be trivially easy for you to either
cite
> > >> where in Einstein's writing he said that relativity means say the
Sun
> > >> orbits the Earth is correct.
>
> > > I never said that. What I did say was that Einstein showed that it's
> > > just as accurate to say the sun revolves about the earth as it is to
>
> > Then you should be able to produce a citation where Einstein showed
this.
>
> > > say the earth revolves about the sun. There is no absolute stable
> > > reference from which we can declare absolute motions, Cory.
>
> > Not a a universal scale, no, but two objects can share an inertial
> > reference frame. The well known Twin Paradox explains this
>
> > > I suggest that you read a few books on basic science and then get
back
> > > to us, Cory. :)
>
> > Considering that I already utterly debunked your claim that Special
> > Relativity show your claim, I suggest that it is you who needs to read
a
> > few books on basic science.
>
> > >> Or it should be trivially easy for you you to use Einstein's
equations
> > >> to prove this to me.
> > > It is indeed easy enough to prove from Einstein's postulates. Are
you
> > > really a moron, Cory, or do you just play one on TV?
>
> > If it is so easy to do, then why don't you do so? Probably because you
> > can;t actually do it,as I have already shown, elsewhere. The fact that
> > you don't provide proof means that your reply is an ad hominem. Yet
more
> > evidence of your hypocrisy.
>
> Says the proven ****eater. LMAO! :-)
snip
Red Pillock, bugger of and take your unsavoury fetish with you.
Wombat
|
