Re: Proof that God eats **** and that Jesus *is* ****!

[irrelevant groups trimmed]

"Laurence Taylor" <see-headers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:NMqdnSdqzuGeiLHVnZ2dnUVZ8trinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Wombat wrote:
>>> Note that He had blessed the bread (and subsequently, the wine),
>>> meaning that the Holy Spirit was on/in it - thus the disciples were
>>> taking in His Body because, like Jesus, the bread was then divine, not
>>>   because they were eating His flesh.
>>
>> I think I may have been thinking of Transubstantiation.
>
> Ah yes - which says that the bread and wine actually _become_ the Body
and
> Blood of Christ. But "become" in what way. Obviously they don't change
> physically, but the change is _spiritual_, ie, they have the Essence of
> Christ

Is that like almond extract?  How did they get enough of it out of Christ
to
last 2000 years?

I've long given up trying to keep my scorecard straight as to which of
your
biblical fables are to be taken literally and which ones have to be
"interpreted" so they agree with your dogma.

[snip]