Do***ented Liar Emerson Wrainwright/ScottyFLL trolling some more ( Re: The ballots are in! Usenet's most laughed-at troll: No One! "I'm having a dialog with myself, and A = non-A!!!")

Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> On Jun 6, 2:17 pm, No One <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > > On Jun 6, 11:01 am, No One <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > > > > On Jun 6, 1:48 am, No One <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > > > > > > On Jun 5, 8:55 pm, No One <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > > > > > > > > LOL!!  No, even the dictionary definition you gave us
indicates
> > > > > > > > > CHARACTERS, in the plural, are necessary.
> >
> > > > > > > > Idiot. It said "the lines spoken by characters in drama or
fiction."
> > > > > > > > One could write a play in which only one character said
anything
> > > > > > > > and the others just listened and reacted in non-verbal
ways. Any
> > > > > > > > sensible person would still call it dialog - the character
is not
> > > > > > > > talking to himself or commenting for the benefit of the
audience.
> >
> > > > > > > > > While Max's characters ENGAGE in dialog with others, Max
does not
> > > > > > > > > write the responses.  So he does not "write dialog".
 But that's what
> > > > > > > > > you said he did, and you are wrong (and again, not
admitting your
> > > > > > > > > error).
> >
> > > > > > > > > Cf. "monologue".
> >
> > > > > > > > ...1.  speech you make to yourself [syn: {soliloquy}]
> > > > > > > >    3.  a (usually long) dramatic speech by a single
actor
> >
> > > > > > > > or 1. A speech uttered by a person alone; soliloquy; also,
talk
> > > > > > > >       or discourse in company, in the strain of a
soliloquy; as,
> > > > > > > >       an account in monologue. --Dryden.
> > > > > > > >       [1913 Webster]
> >
> > > > > > > >    2. A dramatic composition for a single performer.
> > > > > > > >       [1913 Webster]
> >
> > > > > > > > Those don't qualify.  A soliloquy is something like "To
be or not to be"
> > > > > > > > in _Hamlet_, where another character in the drama is not
assumed
> > > > > > > > to hear it.  
> >
> > > > > > > Why did you only read PART of the definition?  I mean, you
posted the
> > > > > > > WHOLE definition here, and everyone can see that you're
wrong!
> >
> > > > > > > Poor thing.
> >
> > > > > > Idiot.  Using Wrainwright's "argument" a statement that an
aircraft
> > > > > > can carry 500 passengers would not apply to an aircraft that
happened
> > > > > > to have only one passenger on it (but zero passengers would be
OK).-
> >
> > > > > OMG!  OMG!  LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > > > Idiot.
> >
> > > > > No no no.  The definition of "aircraft" does not indicate
number of
> > > > > passengers, while the definition of "dialog" does indicate that
more
> > > > > than one person is speaking.
> >
> > > > > BY DEFINITION, "dialog" indicates more than one person speaking.
 BY
> > > > > DEFINITION.  Don't you know geometry?  Doesn't a right angle
have 90
> > > > > degrees BY DEFINITION?
> >
> > > > No, it suggests there is a conversation.
> >
> > > Indeed it does.  In fact, it is practically mandated that a
> > > conversation be held in order for it to be "dialog".
> >
> > > >  Max's characters are
> > > > holding conversations with real people whose statements Max has
> > > > borrowed.
> >
> > > But he isn't writing the dialog.  He is merely participating in
> > > dialog.
> >
> > > But YOU said that he was WRITING the dialog.
> >
> > > Which is incorrect.
> >
> > > Now:  Admit that you were wrong.
> >
> > Idiot - Max V. was writing the dialog for his cast of characters,
> > "Sister Lurlean", etc., so you are the one who is wrong.
> 
> He is not writing dialog.  The characters do not interact.  They are
> separate "stories".
> 
> According to you, since the words are coming from the same author
> (though they don't relate), I suppose King Lear had dialog with Romeo
> and Juliet?  I mean, both stories were written by the same guy... the
> characters were the creation of the same guy... therefore, Shakespeare
> wrote the dialog between Lear and Romeo.
> 
> Oh!  But there WAS no dialog between the two!
> 
> LOL!!!!!!!!

Lying idiot.