Re: The ballots are in! Usenet's most laughed-at troll: NO BRAIN

On Jun 6, 8:19=EF=BF=BDpm, No Brain <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> leaked more
precious cranial fluid:

> You can start with your subject line, Max.

I'm Mother Tucker.  I'll start by a praying for you again.  Please
send me money to sup****t my on line prayer ministry for lost souls
like your'n, No Brain.

> Max, you are an idiot: "dialog":

I ain't even Max - much less no idiot, No Brain.

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDdialogue

Did you decide to spell it right for a change?  Maybe now you can
learn to USE it right too.

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDn 1: a conversation between two persons
[syn:=
 {dialog}, {duologue}]
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD2: the lines spoken by characters in drama
or=
 fiction [syn: {dialog}]

I ain't a writing neither no drama nor no fiction.  I'm a writing
Gospel sermons.  Anyways - my sermons ain't exactly spoke - they're
wrote.  Do you read them all out loud?  I ain't no character no ways.
Note that the definition is precise in a referring to CHARACTERS -
plural - not "one or more characters".  For instance - most of Jack
Kerouac's novel "The Subterraneans" is a first person narrative put
into the mouth of its principal character Leo Percepied.  However -
only the actual conversations between two or more characters in the
novel - all of who are based on real people -  are properly described
as "dialogue".  So when the novel starts with the lines "Once I was
young and had so much more orientation and could talk with clarity and
without as much literary preambling as this...", that ain't dialogue.
For the next thirty pages there are random quotes, but even they ain't
properly no dialogue.

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD dialog
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDn 1: a conversation between two persons
[syn:=
 {dialogue}, {duologue}]
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD2: the lines spoken by characters in drama
or=
 fiction [syn: {dialogue}]

What simple dictionary are you a taking these definitions from?  A
variant spelling ain't exactly no synonym.

> You are writing the dialog for each of your characters

What "characters"?  I write sermons for Jesus that are intended to
lead sinners to Christ.  Why don't you go ask an English teacher to
explain the subtlety to you?  You just ain't a getting it.  I offered
you cir***cision, exorcism and the facts.  We just can't get past them
chunky calcium deposits in what's left of your brain.

> in which said characters try to hold conversations with various people.

If'n they try don't they ever succeed?  Are you a real person?  This
exchange is certainly SURREAL!  You're just confused again.  I just
now come to the conclusion that it must be your natural state.  I
wrote only one side of what can develop into a dialogue.  Therefore I
don't write no kinda dialogue.  If'n anything I write MONOLOGUES and
people comment on them.  I also comment on other people's monologues -
or conversations.


I pray that you'll find our way OUT of confusion and INTO heaven -


The one and only
Reverend Mother Tucker
God's Little Disciple