Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court

On 19 Jun 2008 12:35:46 -0700, 
No One <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>  Craig Chilton -- Help to make the USA 
>  Bigotry-FREE! <xanadu222@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>> Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>  Gunner <gun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> <d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> "Gunner" <gun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


>>>>>>     Other than Liberals and Communists...close cousins... I only 
>>>>>> hate a few  individuals, on their own merits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     You on the other hand, hate an entire class of people.
 
>>>>>   That's one for the QOTD file.

>>>>>[snip]
 
>>>>    Notice the term "people"
>>>>
>>>>     Liberals and their cousins the communists really arnt people.
 They
>>>> are mindless maggots

>>>    Most of them can spell the common word "aren't", though.  Catch my
>>> drift?

>>    Not only that, but being a social liberal is something to be PROUD
of.
>> Social "conservatives" usually are ignorant, bigoted, and hateful loons
>> who seek to destroy the personal liberties of millions of people. 
Making
>> such control freaks the LOWEST of the LOW.

>The troll Emerson Wrainwright's obsessions with obviously bad typing
>aside, you can get a pretty good idea what these people are like
>by how they were doing their best to disrupt weddings:
>
><http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2008/06/17/mn-same***18_prote_0498645976.jpg>
><http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2008/06/17/mn-same***18_prote_0498645992.jpg?
>and
><http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?o=9&f=/c/a/2008/06/17/MN8C11ACCD.DTL&type=gaylesbian>,
>which shows how the bigots ran a truck around SF City Hall in an attempt
>to harass two lesbians from finally being able to be married after 55
>years of being together.  Here's a picture of the ceremony:
><http://imgs.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2008/06/16/mn-same***16_first_0498643464.jpg>.
>
>People who would picket a couple in their 80s on the day they could
>finally get married must truly be among the lowest of the low.  It goes
>well beyond being mere control freaks.

    Yes.  When it come right down to it, anti-same-*** marriage 
loosne (like *all* RRR Cultists, are just plain NUTS!!  Crazy as
barn owls.  And thus, fortunately, are rapidly gaining in their
laughingstock status.

    And being a laughingstock is the last stage of a loathsome 
and bigoted agenda before its permenant and well-deserved 
EXTINCTION.


                  -- Craig Chilton  <xanadu222@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

   xanadu222@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- To E-Mail me.
   http://www.roadrat.com
 --  Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
   http://apifar.blogspot.com
--  Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
   http://pro-christian.blogspot.com
-- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

                   To BE an RRR Cult Lemming...

  ...here are the prerequisites:

        -- Be dumber than dirt.
        -- Be as hateful as a junkyard dog.
        -- Be mindlessly gullible to hate-propaganda.
        -- Be too bone-STUPID to recognize that ***ual
               orientation is merely a TRIVIAL *variation*
               of NORMALCY, like eye color and handedness.
        -- Be empty-headed enough to think human
               reproductive-process entities equate
               with people.
        -- Be UNEDUCATED enough to WHINE about
               "unelected" judges every time an appellate
               court stomps on one of your loathesome
               agendas, but hypocritically clam up about 
               them when their decisions *favor* you.
               (Educated people know that such judges
               are appointed because that is the law.)
        -- Be CLUELESS enough to call judges "activist"
               if they disagree with you, but "construc-
               tionist" if they don't.  (Since ALL judges
               very legally create Judicial Law in their
               decisions of record. (RRR Cult lemmings
               think that "activist" judges contravene
               the Constitution in their rulings, while
               "constructionist ones uphold it.  But in
               reality, BOTH simply INTERPRET the
               Constitution in "gray" areas.  The ones
               scorned as "activist" by the RRR usually
               try their best to interpret as favorably
               as they can toward human rights and 
               personal liberties.  The ones they call
               "constructionist" try to interpret the
               Consitution with an eye toward limiting
               or eliminating aspects of personal liberty.)
               Judges denigrated as "activist" by the
               RRR thus are usually egalitarians!
        -- Be IDIOTIC enough to think that same-***
               marriage coud in ANY way be harmful.
        -- Be clueless enough to think the world is only
               6,000 years old.
        -- Be LOATHSOME enough to want to see girls
               and women FORCED to gestate UNwanted
               pregnancies to term against their will (which
               would be a very real, 9-month-long form
               of RAPE.  (For anyone advocating this who
               thinks he's Christian, add "UN-Christian"
               to "LOATHSOME.)
        -- Be FAR dumber than dirt.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~