TWO Questions That ANY True Christian Can Factually Answer

On Jul 3, 7:33=EF=BF=BDam, very old Craig Chilton <xan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
babble=
d
again:

Let's make a deal, Craig.  You don't call me no nasty names that
includes the ugly F word and I won't call the homo ***uals no queers.
OK?

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDThe questions that NO one who opposes
fully-=
legal same-*** marriage,

Almighty God opposes same *** SHAM marriages.  And ain't NO question
beyond the Lord's ability to answer.  If'n you ain't seriously
considered the arguments against same *** SHAM marriage, you obviously
ain't done much real research into the topic.  At God's ONLY True
Church of Holy Assurance, we have.

> has EVER, to the best of my knowledge, been able to answer factually:

Did you read Dr. James Dobson's "Marriage Under Fire"?  That book'll
give you alla the answers you need.

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD "If a same-*** couple
t=
hat's been cohabitating

AKA - in SIN!!!

> in a=EF=BF=BDcommunity for 20 years gets the right to become
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDlegally married to one another,

In the eyes of God they won't never - so you really need to rephrase
the question with words like these "secures (or wins) from the state
the special privilege of becoming as it were legally married" etc.

> and then ties the knot,=EF=BF=BDHOW could that possibly be detrimental
in=
 ANY way
> to the marriage of any opposite-*** couple in that=EF=BF=BDcommunity?

That's simple.  Same *** sham marriage makes a non-procreative ***ual
union the basis of a family relation****p.  Marriage is the building
block of family's - and family's the building block of society.  Homo
***uals that mocks marriage will tell you they're just creating a new
and different kinda family - but that ain't how it works.  Study's
show that children do best when they're brung up in a stable marriage
by their own biological parents.  God allowed polygamy century's ago
when the infant death rate was real high - but if'n you read the text
carefully you'll see that polygamous marriages were always doomed.
That's because we're supposed to get married like Adam and Eve - one
man and one woman - and have lotsa kids.

Same *** mock marriage makes ***ual acts the basis of a relation****p -
instead of a traditional family unit in which both genes and family
value's are handed down from one generation to t'other.  If'n ***
becomes the building block of a relation****p, who's to say that three,
four or even more people of the same *** can't get married?  You may
think religious people like me is just joking when we bring that
subject up - but it's a genuine concern.  If ***ual pleasure by itself
becomes the building block of marriage, why can't people marry as many
people as they wanna?  Why can't people marry *** robots or even
dogs?  If'n you ignore the traditional definition of marriage as the
union of one man and one woman who can at least potentially produce
and raise children together, why get married at all?  Any homo will
tell you you don't have to mock marriage to screw around.  How many of
them waits 'til their wedding night to screw?  Absolutely NONE!

We ain't mastered no kinda cloning yet - and before we ever do there
will be little Franken kiddy's a running around making trouble.  When
I see the Mexican gangs down in the barrio without nothing worth while
to do - I wonder if'n we ain't there already.  The best the homo's can
do is trade eggs and sperms and make four way baby's.  That kinda life
is pure confusion for kids - and for a lotta adults too that has to
deal with weird definitions of marriage.

Notice how the divorce rate shot up after lustful women started a
taking the Pill back in the sixty's.  Notice how many floozy's today
screw around and don't even bother a getting married.  These are the
results of a makling cheap *** thrills the basis of relation****ps.
Study's also show that the children of confessed homo ***uals grow up
to be promiscuous.  Homo ***uals are generally more promiscuous than
straight people already.

And with the homo's we're usually a talking about some weird kinda ***
play that involves (for the lesbians) whirly gizmo's, carrots, celery
stalks, banana's, cu***bers, telephones and DOGS and (for the gay men)
rimming and fisting and felching and snow balling dirty butt holes and
a spreading germs from one to t'other.

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDAnd...
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD "Congress, and several
=
states have passed so-called
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD"Defense of Marriage Acts"
(DOMA).=
 =EF=BF=BDJust WHAT suppos-
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD edly-detrimental factor could
pos=
sibly affect opposite-
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD *** couples' marriages
negatively=
, which could thus
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD justify so drastic a law?
=EF=BF=
=BD

If same *** sham marriages become fully legal, they will cheapen the
definition of marriage by a making it less a union between family's
with shared value's and more a union between two (or MORE) lustful
people into fornication that doesn't really care about a building real
family units that will enrich the fabric of society.  They base
everything on their ***ual attractions to other people's body parts -
mouth to booby's, ding-a-ling to butt hole, nose to smegma - and so
on.  Since homo ***uals can't really love, that makes lust the basis
of relation****ps that are supposed to be based on commitment to family
value's.  With the homo ***uals it's all about the orgasm.  Our church
PROVED that what they feel is just dressed up lust!

> What do such laws "defend" opposite-*** marriage AGAINST?

Relation****ps between any persons that based purely on physical
attraction, flesh wor****p, ***ual feti****sm and/or ***ual
gratification.

> What is the THREAT?"

Same *** SHAM marriage threatens to turn society into a mob of self
seeking hedonists.  Homo ***ual mock marriages won't last neither
lessen the partners are old, ugly, fat, diseased, crazy and/or dirt
poor

> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDHey!! =EF=BF=BDRRR Cultists! =EF=BF=BD

Excuse ME!  I am a True Christian - not no cultist.  I also got every
right to my religious beliefs.  If'n you don't like religion maybe you
should move over to Godless Red China.  They believe in abortion over
there.  The souls of millions of unborn children cry out against all
of you what's good blood on your hands!

> Inquiring SENSIBLE minds want to know.

And yet YOU, a dirty old man that's lost his marbles, asked the
question.

What are them stupid symbols around your name anyways?  Some kinda arm
chair that you done sunk down in?


I'll pray for your sullied soul -


Reverend Mother Lurlean Tucker
The Lord's TRUE Little Lamb