Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Homosexuality in Politics > Re: Is "GAY MAR...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 115 of 339 Topic 33847 of 34783
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the past?

by Howard Brazee <howard@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 4, 2008 at 08:46 PM

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:04:13 -0700 (PDT), Emerson Wainwright
<emersonwainwright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> Some gay agenda-ists say "gay marriage" is valid because such was
>> allowed in the past.
>
>They would be presenting a fallacy known as an appeal to tradition,
>just as YOU would be if you said that historically same-*** marriage
>was not allowed and therefore should not be allowed today.

Marriage had a much bigger change when divorce was allowed.   That
change impacted the very basis of marriage and child rearing.

Accepting gay marriages is not nearly as traumatic on existing
marriages and child rearing as accepting divorce was.    The big
difference is that we're used to divorce now.




 339 Posts in Topic:
Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the pas
 death from above <cere  2008-07-03 19:14:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-03 20:25:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-07 15:42:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-07-07 21:35:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-07-04 03:26:20 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-04 08:04:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-07-04 12:25:24 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-04 12:50:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-04 15:35:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-05 00:12:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-05 04:30:25 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-05 13:19:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 07:03:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Stone me" <  2008-07-05 14:18:54 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 02:49:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 14:10:35 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 16:18:17 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-06 15:05:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 09:54:11 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 12:13:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-07 09:35:20 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 14:41:02 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-06 21:24:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-06 16:08:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-06 22:13:46 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-06 18:25:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-08 00:16:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-08 14:02:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:22:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:14:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 09:27:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 14:44:10 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-05 16:43:29 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 09:06:46 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 18:07:02 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-06 08:50:54 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Stone me" <  2008-07-06 18:24:30 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-05 21:22:16 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 03:49:46 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 13:15:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 14:53:23 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-06 11:16:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 09:14:29 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 11:49:23 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 06:39:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-07 10:24:10 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-07 06:49:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:26:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-08 04:56:33 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-09 01:37:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 07:01:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-08 15:26:44 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-09 15:02:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-11 05:45:54 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-22 21:17:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 12:21:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-09 19:59:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 14:36:24 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 14:37:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 10:33:42 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-04 07:00:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:50:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-04 07:31:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-04 08:13:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-04 17:19:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 06:32:18 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 11:35:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 08:22:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-07 07:45:22 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 4square <v7xrt@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 21:03:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 15:35:15 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 15:18:15 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-05 16:27:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-06 16:16:35 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 17:29:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 16:29:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-05 21:33:30 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-06 20:32:37 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 06:51:42 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 21:08:28 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-06 07:05:33 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-07 07:17:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-07-07 11:54:31 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 02:54:59 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 10:34:49 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 10:38:59 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 02:57:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 09:01:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-11 05:23:24 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:30:54 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-18 00:31:49 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 18:09:46 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Ren Fisk @[EMAIL PR  2008-07-19 17:01:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-04 08:18:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-05 12:44:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-04 08:28:30 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-05 11:39:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 13:05:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-06 10:38:17 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-07 09:11:06 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-07 10:55:28 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-06 09:53:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 08:55:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 03:52:39 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-07 07:11:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-07 03:57:06 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-07 17:04:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Kingo Gondo" &  2008-07-07 17:18:12 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-08 00:17:53 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:30:15 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-04 10:31:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-04 17:22:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 02:42:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-04 11:04:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-04 20:46:33 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Stone me" <  2008-07-05 19:35:18 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:59:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 07:19:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 09:29:37 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 09:30:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 16:39:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-10 19:38:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 07:14:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-11 17:17:18 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-11 21:54:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 17:25:37 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 01:38:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 10:55:33 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 17:24:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 16:36:15 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 18:14:01 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-12 00:20:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-12 14:33:59 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 17:34:31 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-12 18:03:35 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 19:12:00 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-13 16:05:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-16 00:50:12 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-10 20:53:25 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-15 18:27:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-07-15 18:59:39 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-15 21:00:25 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 07:11:54 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 09:25:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-11 17:37:19 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 17:59:17 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 01:22:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 18:23:35 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 18:24:04 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-04 11:18:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-04 11:27:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-04 11:30:56 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-04 17:24:17 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-04 20:43:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-07-04 14:36:52 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-07-04 15:08:23 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-05 00:19:22 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-07-04 15:09:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 "Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-05 00:22:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-04 22:10:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-07-04 15:31:09 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-04 15:36:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 10:48:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 12:23:27 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 10:51:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 12:25:37 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 10:59:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 death from above <cere  2008-07-05 14:22:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-05 15:35:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 death from above <cere  2008-07-05 14:31:59 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-05 16:24:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:04:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 14:45:44 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-05 16:37:22 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-05 22:29:04 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:09:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-05 18:09:17 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-07-07 01:59:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 ape shall not kill ape &l  2008-07-07 17:12:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-07 19:23:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-09 00:55:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-08 18:52:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 ape shall not kill ape &l  2008-07-07 17:14:23 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-08 03:41:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-08 21:33:39 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-10 13:00:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 19:10:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-10 13:22:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-11 05:12:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-11 14:26:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-09 06:31:49 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 08:35:27 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 09:48:00 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 01:27:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 16:16:06 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 02:04:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:23:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-17 19:55:24 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-18 14:26:42 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 06:52:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:38:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-17 12:01:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 12:22:18 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-17 14:56:16 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 18:03:31 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-18 12:01:04 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 13:12:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-18 16:27:54 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-19 20:47:44 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 08:57:37 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 09:00:11 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-09 14:35:29 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 09:04:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 09:10:35 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 11:53:20 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-09 15:00:56 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 13:18:42 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 08:39:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 01:30:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-11 11:56:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 12:56:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 17:21:02 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 01:36:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-13 18:37:56 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-16 00:54:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 13:21:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 12:07:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-11 13:46:11 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-11 13:56:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 16:10:09 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 16:13:55 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-11 17:07:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-11 17:38:38 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 17:56:22 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 18:02:28 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-12 07:05:12 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-12 07:12:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 07:45:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-12 16:00:11 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 07:49:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-12 08:16:16 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 12:03:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-12 13:25:39 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-12 17:29:11 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-12 20:06:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:39:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:39:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 12:20:16 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 12:40:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-10 12:57:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 19:07:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-09 12:53:28 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:24:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-17 19:56:31 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-17 19:09:22 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-18 06:02:28 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 20:03:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-18 15:48:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 20:07:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-18 06:04:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-18 14:29:28 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-18 12:02:31 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-17 20:41:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 20:46:45 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-18 06:05:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-17 20:52:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-17 21:09:15 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 06:50:49 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-22 16:38:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 13:13:06 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-18 16:27:00 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 12:59:47 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-09 13:13:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 14:47:17 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 15:06:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-09 15:42:01 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 20:04:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-18 15:50:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 16:06:39 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 16:07:27 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 16:48:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 06:51:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 07:22:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 08:08:34 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 08:09:40 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 David Johnston <david@  2008-07-22 21:19:59 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 09:18:44 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 12:01:45 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 13:10:36 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-22 16:36:52 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 13:14:29 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 13:38:18 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-18 13:43:23 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-18 14:21:42 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 16:55:09 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 16:59:05 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 17:03:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-10 14:20:07 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 17:03:45 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 17:05:43 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 13:38:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-09 17:08:37 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 17:35:53 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 17:41:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 19:52:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 13:47:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-09 19:53:34 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-19 20:44:48 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 20:03:16 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 13:43:25 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-09 22:09:12 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 moviePig <pwallace@[EM  2008-07-10 05:03:03 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-10 09:40:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 13:45:56 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-10 17:10:52 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-10 20:44:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-10 19:52:58 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-10 19:55:12 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 08:52:49 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-11 11:45:09 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-12 01:32:34 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 18:52:41 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-16 00:42:29 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Bill Steele <ws21@[EMA  2008-07-16 14:01:35 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-07-17 04:58:00 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 calvin <crice5@[EMAIL   2008-07-12 13:40:44 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-07-12 15:07:26 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-13 18:43:12 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-10 20:17:27 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-10 21:38:21 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-11 17:14:32 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-11 15:06:51 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 George Peatty <peattyg  2008-07-11 20:47:50 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-07-12 00:47:13 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 07:13:01 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Okierazorbacker <okier  2008-07-11 07:42:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:11:57 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:15:08 
Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the
 Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-07-17 11:26:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Sun Sep 7 20:25:58 CDT 2008.