Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Homosexuality in Politics > Re: Antigun Spi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 968 of 2715 Topic 33675 of 34359
Post > Topic >>

Re: Antigun Spin on Heller...Like a Mixmaster!

by The Secretary of HomIntern <cbcrfanexl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 5, 2008 at 09:04 AM

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:14:15 -0500, RD (The Sandman) k'lamed:
> Synthetic Networked Android Responsible for Killing and Yardwork
> wrote:
>> Hail Eris! On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:17:42 -0500, Eris Kallisti Discordia
>> was laughing at the antics of RD (The Sandman), when they suddenly
burst
>> out in tears:
>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:48:12 -0700, Theotis Johnson sat in thee
Comfee
>>>> Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>> On 27 Jun 2008 22:50:06 -0700, No One wrote:
>>>>>>Gunner writes:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:22:10 GMT, Dionisio wrote:
>>>>>>> >PLMerite wrote:
>>>>>>> >> "No One" wrote:
>>>>>>> >>><http://www.topix.com/city/kentwood-mi/2008/04/armed-robbery-sh
>>>>>>> >>>oo ting-at-kentwood-comic-book-store>
>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>>>> >> Doesn't sound like the crook got any money.   Being unarmed
>>>>>>> >> didn't do the victim any good, did it?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> ><ROTFL!> He cited an *unarmed* victim as an example as to why
>>>>>>> >armed citizens don't stop crime?!?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes..the stupid schmuck really did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Two complete and utter idiots = Gunner and Dionisio, neither of whom
>>>>>>realize that having a gun does you little good when someone is
>>>>>>already pointing a weapon at you.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are an Idiot!
>>>> 
>>>> Pee-Wee, it doesn't help to have a gun in one's holster when there's
a
>>>> gun already pointing at one,
>>> 
>>> It may well help, particularly if he doesn't know you have it.  One
>>> vote for CCW.
>> 
>> Again, not that good of an idea. The innocent civilian with a gun
>> pointing at him, who manages to pull it out of its holster without
being
>> noticed, is largely a film artifact. Even Charles Bronson was only just
>> some guy, offscreen.
> 
> Jut where did I say I was acting in your scenario?  I said if I had a
> concealed weapon he doesn't know that I have.  It is amazing what one
can
> do if the person's attention is directed somewhere else and he is not
> expecting you to do anything.

Mileage varies, on that score. Some potential victims are smarter than
criminals, others are not. Sometimes they're roughly the same. Plus,
there's the matter of the cost-to-benefit ratio, addressed below.

>>>> and having that gun can give one very stupid ideas about playing
>>>> Charles Bronson,
>>> 
>>> Not necessarily.  A gun is not a cure-all, it isn't an aspirin,
>>> however, there *may* come a moment when it becomes available as an
>>> option.  IOW, if you are holding a gun on me, don't get distracted,
>>> don't watch that blond on the corner, don't do anything that places
>>> your attention elsewhere or you could possibly end up very dead.
>> 
>> Usually, playing Movie Hero tends to result in Dead Film Buff, because
>> most of us would need to be CGI'd before we could kick a gun out of a
>> hand, even the hand of a momentarily distracted mugger.
> 
> Excuse me, but if you are within a few feet of me and paying attention
to
> that blond in the corner, I can kill you before you react to me.  The
> government spent a lot money teaching me to do just that.

If I'm a criminal paying more attention to some broad than to my mark, I'm
clearly too stupid to live, IMO. Not to say that all criminals are smarter
than that, but the stupider ones tend to get weeded out.

>>>> when doing so would likely result in a dead non-criminal.
>>> 
>>> Again, a possibility.  Of course, that could also occur if I didn't
>>> have the gun.
>> 
>> If you have a gunbarrel pointing at you, you're very likely to do your
>> best to encourage the wielder to refrain from firing, including keeping
>> said wielder as calm as possible, because nervous trigger fingers have
a
>> way of suddenly clenching.
> 
> Absolutely, but then his attention is on me.  It is when that attention
> wanders somewhere else....

Meaning, you'd be counting on him being stupider -- not totally
unrealistic, but not reliable. I'd be prepared to get robbed.

>> There are no guarantees that you won't get shot anyway, but you stand
>> a better chance of only being robbed. Being robbed is way better than
>> being robbed and killed.
> 
> Not true. Statistics show that resistance with a gun is more effective
> in many cases than no resisitance at all.

Statistics *lie*. You can pull them out of your arse on the spot, or grab
them off some website and interpret them as you see fit. If you have a
gun, and pull it whilst being robbed, at least one of two or more people
will more than likely die for the sake of robbing or not being robbed --
"Give me my stuff or give me death!" Thanks, but no thanks. My stuff is
not worth my life. If I'm dead, I don't care about it anymore, but if I'm
not, I can get more stuff.

> "Self-defense with firearms
> 
> *38% of the victims defending themselves with a firearm attacked the
> offender, and the others threatened the offender with the weapon.
> 
> *A fifth of the victims defending themselves with a firearm suffered an
> injury, compared to almost half of those who defended themselves with
> weapons other than a firearm or who had no weapon.
> 
> Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/hvfsdaft.txt

"The world is full of stupid people..." Lots of stupid criminals who watch
too many movies, frex, and lots of stupid citizens who do so as well.
Keeping in mind that one should always do what the person holding a gun on
one says is a smart idea (and even applies to the representatives of
government, who can usually arrange to get bigger guns than anything you
have, as well as more of them), and shouldn't be disregarded just because
the criminal may be stupid or nervous. He may not be stupid enough to let
you have a chance to kill him, but he may be nervous enough to kill you
without intending. Keeping him calm, cool and collected serves you well,
because a reasonably smart mugger will not elect to commit murder, since
the penalty is a tad stiff, should he get caught. If he's clearly stupid,
then by all means, distract him and take your best shot, but if he's kind
of borderline, take no chances. Move slowly, talk low, stay calm, and you
might live.

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political." 
Bent Depraved N. Deviant Cock-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top Asshole #3; Lits **** #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Rotate email munge 13 times to get real addy
"The moral of the story is: Kill the parents kill the children."

"What a lame copycat you are." -- the ****chMonkey4Life, posting as "The
Secretary of HomIntern", in MID: <UkdTh.2573$Z66.747@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
re-defines irony yet again.

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the ****chMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/****chie/

"Stupidity excuses nothing.  It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Old politicalcompass.org:
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
New political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.67
Odd. I seem to be swaying.

"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<Ie2Qe.8199$wb5.1083@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
http://www.lowgenius.net/kookway.htm
TEH WAY OF THE K00K 
Never learn from your mistakes.
Always practice your mistakes; you may get them right.
Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: k00ksuit!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Order the Crab Won Ton
Plagiarism is your friend. Use it.
Whenever contradicted; morph, start calling people names, and make false
accusations. Include the children of your target in your allegations,
even if they don't have any. 
(06-Jun-05) When nobody else will listen, post to your own fan group.
(06-Jun-05) Obviously, since you have your own fan group, this must mean
that you have fans. Post prolifically to your fan group - you wouldn't
want to disappoint them! 
(10-May-2005)Everyone reads usenet. Approval here means approval
everywhere.
Post numerous blank posts, or posts containing only a message id.
Post numerous copy&paste web articles from crackerpot websites.
Never forget to call kookologists "k00ks." 
If there are several, call them "sockpuppets" too
When all else fails, accuse various and sundry kookologists of e-mailing
viruses to you.  This is a sure-fire method of garnering sympathy and
ensuring that the General Public will always see things your way.  An
especially effective sub-strategy here is to accuse them of infecting
you with the 'Sasser' worm via e-mail. 
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
approve the drivel you are writing!
(9-Jul-05) Anytime your computer is infected with a virus, bogged down
by spyware, attacked over your internet connection, or otherwise suffers
from preventable problems, government agencies are responsible and are
trying to silence you and are monitoring your computer files.
Ignore all traffic signs and feel free to trespass, you don't have to
obey any rules.
Scare your enemies with lawsuits, police escorts and whines. 
Always back up your empty (albeit noisy) threats with phony LARTs, false
police re****ts, and harassing letters to the FBI and other gubbermint
agencies.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
likely others will believe you!
If you can't find anyone as crazy as yourself to sup****t you in the
flamewars you start with the normal population, create sock puppets and
use anonymous remailers that shamelessly hang on every word you write.
(17-Mar-05) When dealing with law enforcement, remember that it is they
who have the problem, not you.  Be sure to inform them of this at every
available op****tunity, as they will surely appreciate your constructive
criticism.  Be sure to make them aware that YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!  ("The
cops like that, when people know their rights.  That way they don't have
to read them to you on the way to the station." - George Carlin)
The more your fake personalities adulate you, the more respect you'll
get!
When confronted with a reality that you don't like: Announce loudly
that you are departing, never to return as long as there's an Internet.
Come back in three or four days and claim you were drunk, hacked,
abducted by alience, or forged. Alternately you can just not even
mention your prior departure, and if anyone asks you about it, either
ignore them or respond with something along the lines of "YOUR NOT THE
BOSS OF ME!  *PLONK*!" People really know you mean business then. 
Always remain clueproof.
(20-Mar-05) Anyone who does not believe that you are the reincarnation
of [$DEITY_OR_PROPHET] is obviously an infidel lacking in faith whose
soul in in peril of everlasting damnation. 
When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
screed in response.
Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
Neither is illiteracy. 
Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
Claim you will destroy <insert newsfroup> for attacking you.
When sp****d, send cmsg for Fanboi newsfroup(s).
Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!
Post Edit when the TRVTH hurts.
Always sneck the offending newsfroups.
Always poast pictures of yourself so you can be admired in all your k00ky
glory.
Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
Post lots of boasts about your high IQ and incredible talents.
(20-Mar-05) If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Anybody who fails to understand this is engaged in a deliberate campaign
of misinformation and character assassination.
Always <plonk> somebody just before replying the plonkee!
The k00k considers itself the most intelligent person in any
conversation, possibly on the planet. Other people are benighted and
ignorant, and have been waiting their whole lives for the k00k to rescue
them from intellectual darkness.
Write a self-published book and claim it a success. Bonus points for
comparing it to "Mein Kampf" and/or the Bible.
Declare yourself equal to a deity of your choice.
Claim that you've come from other planets.
Claim thousands of past lives.
Frothing complaints carry far more weight when you send them from
"legal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" some domain.
Nothing strikes terror into the hearts of your detractors more than
telling them that you're archiving their messages for possible use in
the future.
Never forget that everyone else posting to Usenet is a paid
disinformation agent looking to discredit you.
Usenet is governed by US law. If a poster in Romania killfiles you, he's
obviously violating your 1st Amendment rights and can be sued.
Every news admin in the world hangs out in NANAU, and they're just dying
to nuke the account of that meanyhead who just called you "****nozzle".
Drop 'em a line - that's what they're there for, after all.
AUK will be closed down. Just you wait and see.
They've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of free speech and
*yours* will be next.
The k00k will, without any trace of irony, lie, manipulate, impersonate,
censor, and declare themselves powerful in ways ranging from the ability
to have an account shut down to being God Herself, in order to convince
people that they are not liars, manipulators, censors, or insane. 
Abuse women while telling how many hundreds you've loved. Nevermind that
you're one ugly mother****er and that there were 30,000 femininas that
thought you were a s***bag with bad teeth.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
require proof.
Do not neglect to poast your responses to forums that the originator
doesn't read. This will make the people in that forum very impressed
with how you tear him to shreds without him being able to respond. They
like it even better if you are off-topic for that forum.
Keep in mind that lack of evidence sup****ting your konspiracy theory
actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.
(06-Oct-05) When spanked, always retreat to the safety of the Ad
Hominem.
(04-Aug-2005) When spanked mercilessly for days on end, proving with
each poast just what an illiterate and ignorant fool you are, ALWAYS
claim owner****p of [person(s),froup(s)]. This works on so many levels.
It inspires dread in your opponents that they will no longer be able to
poast in their home froup and that they will eventually have to pay
rent, to name just two.
Any problems with your poasts are the fault of the konspirators, who are
trying to stop you from preventing the extinction of humanity.
Konspiracies that are able to subvert whole governments are always unable
to silence konspiracy ko0ks.
The entire United States government is willing to spend millions of
dollars for the sole purpose of harassing you.
Hollywood is making movies based on your personal life.
Do not consult psychiatrists or other mental health professionals. They
are part of the konspiracy, and will sedate you and lock you away and
keep you drugged if you tell them the truth.
Numerology and Astrology are respectable sciences and are useful for
proving your case.
Everyone is Tim Hill, or David Green, or...
There is a fine line between trolling and kookery. Find that line and
cross it repeatedly. When you are killfiled and/or LARTed for net.abuse
as a result, claim victory. If you lose multiple accounts, this merely
proves that you are indeed a world-class troll, with a black-belt in
manipulation.
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If
they respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
Publi****ng people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
stores, and absolutely not to be ****ed with.
Everyone is out to get you. You can put a stop to this by telling
everyone that they're out to get you at every available op****tunity.
You are the only sane one.
Those that give you a hard time about morally bankrupt things you
yourself admit to are just persecutioners of the new inquisition.
Yelling in all caps and cursing at your detractors is debate. Your
detractors laughing at you with sarcastic remarks is obvious anger and
jealousy.
If doing something results in the loss of your account, legal hassles,
or blunt trauma injury, do it again. It always works better the second
time. 
Asterisks, lots and lots of Asterisks.
Poking holes in kookscreed is stalking, and is a felony.
K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that only
the k00k can see.
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"

....with thanks to Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin, Cujo, CJ
Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry, of AUK. Meow. Original thread
at http://tinyurl.com/3fsho
- some posts may not appear due to
x-no-archive headers. The spelling mistakes are intentional, dolt.
 




 2715 Posts in Topic:
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
The Black Goat With A Tho  2008-06-14 22:18:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Jim Bianchi <jimbo@[EM  2008-06-15 00:39:01 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-14 23:56:08 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-06-15 11:05:11 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-15 18:12:01 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-06-15 21:51:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-16 03:12:51 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-16 11:25:37 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-16 17:10:06 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-06-16 15:33:30 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-16 16:30:54 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-16 19:16:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
The Original Demon Prince  2008-06-17 01:53:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-16 22:02:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Porsche Monkey For Life &  2008-06-19 01:58:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-18 23:21:17 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-06-19 09:01:45 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-19 11:07:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Dennis Kemmerer&quo  2008-06-19 15:54:01 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-19 22:27:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-19 22:55:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-19 20:42:33 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-20 08:00:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-20 21:11:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-21 03:10:41 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-20 22:12:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Demon Lord Henry Schmidt   2008-06-21 06:25:18 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-22 02:18:07 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Synthetic Networked Andro  2008-06-22 10:12:12 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-24 11:54:26 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"The God of Odd Stat  2008-06-25 01:39:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:53:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
The Original Demon Prince  2008-06-26 03:31:21 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:04:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
The Original Demon Prince  2008-06-28 02:24:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-25 10:50:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 22:49:40 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:23:18 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-28 16:47:11 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-17 01:55:11 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
gregvk <greg@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-21 05:23:27 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Emerson Wainwright <em  2008-06-19 11:37:51 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-19 19:04:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-19 14:27:06 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-06-19 13:11:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-20 18:49:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
mariposas rand mair fheal  2008-06-20 16:16:54 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 00:15:44 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-19 22:26:45 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 13:59:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-20 10:20:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 18:29:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-20 14:32:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-20 14:34:36 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-19 12:35:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 00:32:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-19 22:24:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 14:07:18 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-20 09:36:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 17:00:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-20 11:59:17 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 17:15:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-20 12:39:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 18:55:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-20 14:11:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 19:37:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-20 15:54:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 00:18:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-20 20:00:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-20 19:50:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-20 20:09:14 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-20 20:27:42 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 00:26:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-21 00:36:25 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 01:58:56 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-21 02:40:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 02:48:44 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-21 11:27:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 12:47:56 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-21 13:11:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-21 09:51:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Wayne" <myg  2008-06-21 15:07:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Scout" <me4  2008-06-21 15:15:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 20:51:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-21 20:47:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-21 16:48:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 01:28:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-21 22:04:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 03:09:06 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-21 22:15:57 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-21 21:05:51 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-21 23:50:07 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Bama Brian <eddyclay@[  2008-06-22 10:34:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgis  2008-06-22 15:04:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-22 14:10:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-22 13:32:33 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-22 15:16:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-22 17:22:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-22 17:41:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-22 21:55:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-23 10:20:13 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-23 12:10:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-23 17:39:12 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-23 18:56:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 03:20:44 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 10:05:41 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 12:40:56 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 15:42:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:48:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 09:56:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 15:38:36 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 15:46:53 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 18:00:15 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 21:32:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-23 22:16:42 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 10:02:01 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:47:58 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 18:27:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 23:29:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 23:37:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-25 09:58:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Herb Martin" &  2008-06-25 12:12:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 13:46:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 13:44:49 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-25 17:23:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 17:49:15 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 08:08:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 08:51:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:08:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 11:47:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:00:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 18:07:37 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 10:19:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 11:10:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:48:20 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 18:37:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:34:49 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 08:48:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 01:51:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 11:24:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 12:44:22 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 17:37:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 01:54:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 11:31:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 12:46:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 17:39:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:30:58 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 08:35:05 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:17:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 11:48:14 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:00:18 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 18:07:21 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-24 12:34:37 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 11:14:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-24 11:16:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:48:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-24 19:20:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:36:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <dmille5@[EMA  2008-06-24 03:40:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 10:00:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-06-25 00:53:15 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 23:30:18 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-06-25 23:39:01 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 17:51:15 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgis  2008-06-23 07:12:25 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-23 11:42:20 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 10:39:14 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-23 10:44:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 13:59:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-23 14:05:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 14:07:26 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-23 17:04:41 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <dmille5@[EMA  2008-06-24 03:46:20 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-28 17:03:36 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-29 01:08:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-28 17:05:41 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-29 01:10:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-23 23:13:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-23 20:13:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <dmille5@[EMA  2008-06-24 04:00:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-28 17:04:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-29 01:09:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"John R. Carroll&quo  2008-06-22 17:51:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-24 12:11:27 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 12:45:23 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:58:01 
Not to Worry! America CANNOT Invade IRAN! We PROMISED Not to!
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 20:06:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-24 13:41:48 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 15:31:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:58:44 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-22 03:50:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Zombywoof <Zomby-Woof@  2008-06-23 00:44:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-24 12:18:21 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"Felix D." <  2008-06-24 12:47:32 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 08:00:21 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-24 13:31:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-22 11:29:25 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 18:05:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-22 13:55:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 19:46:49 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-24 12:54:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
juanjo <jonpetry@[EMAI  2008-06-28 16:43:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Zombywoof <Zomby-Woof@  2008-06-29 23:22:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-22 03:48:36 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-22 11:27:27 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 18:15:36 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-22 13:54:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 20:00:17 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-22 13:34:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-22 21:44:42 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-22 17:23:06 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-23 11:39:57 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 10:42:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-23 18:41:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 21:33:40 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 16:01:15 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 10:23:57 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 17:34:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:48:26 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-25 01:02:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 08:13:57 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 03:04:22 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:16:47 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 14:20:20 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 14:25:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 10:44:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 18:13:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-23 17:48:56 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 14:09:26 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-23 22:16:30 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 21:35:52 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 16:05:30 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 10:36:27 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 18:17:25 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:48:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-25 01:35:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:46:37 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 03:38:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:02:47 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 15:37:05 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 10:30:56 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 19:44:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:09:12 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 20:43:15 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:51:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 22:07:32 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:17:51 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 01:33:49 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 05:55:51 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-23 16:32:01 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-23 22:20:25 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-23 17:31:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 00:19:34 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Bama Brian <eddyclay@[  2008-06-24 09:08:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 17:09:46 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 14:02:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 20:44:45 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 16:31:44 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 23:18:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:56:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-25 11:35:11 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-06-26 00:12:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-27 09:51:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-06-28 02:04:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 03:41:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:06:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 14:29:37 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 10:33:26 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 19:50:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:19:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-25 11:34:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 03:55:17 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-27 09:50:17 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-27 15:22:06 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-27 10:38:20 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-27 16:37:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-27 13:43:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:55:02 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 03:58:09 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:05:10 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 14:39:19 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
grey_ghost471-newsgroups@  2008-06-24 12:41:04 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 13:58:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-24 20:58:16 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-25 02:17:42 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 07:53:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 04:02:47 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-24 21:24:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 00:27:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-25 23:30:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Tim May <timcmay@[EMAI  2008-06-25 23:46:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
strabo <strabo@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 20:08:24 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
No One <noone@[EMAIL P  2008-06-26 17:59:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-25 11:20:13 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Dionisio <moc.rr.thigh  2008-06-25 01:00:08 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-25 11:21:29 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 13:53:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 20:53:25 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 16:25:51 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 23:23:08 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-25 11:27:43 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 04:05:31 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-27 09:44:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-27 14:53:13 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-27 10:35:57 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-23 11:38:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Craig Chilton -- Help to   2008-06-23 18:03:00 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 14:11:35 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-23 22:25:13 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-23 21:36:53 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 17:13:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner Asch <gunner@[E  2008-06-24 17:48:14 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-25 01:41:21 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-25 08:10:23 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 04:11:36 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 02:09:55 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 14:43:59 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 10:39:38 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 20:01:03 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
Gunner <gunner@[EMAIL   2008-06-26 13:20:39 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-26 15:40:21 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-23 16:29:28 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-23 23:20:17 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 13:41:50 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilto  2008-06-24 20:44:37 
Re: NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
"RD (The Sandman)&qu  2008-06-24 16:22:18 
Re: NOTICE TO