Re: ACLU & Client, MxGov, To Sue Ice For Being Anti-Semetic

"Don Gabacho" <jpastore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e41b5982-f27c-4f01-83c1-6498f0652fdb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 14, 3:07 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >
> >
news:19944420-5cb6-4a8c-9035-b4f4f9ae71fa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > On May 14, 1:22 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Don Gabacho wrote:
> > >> > It appears the, now, Mexican Civil Liberties Union is wrong.
> >
> > >> Lie.  There is no Mexican Civil Liberties Union.
> >
> > > There is now. It was the ACLU.
> >
> > LIE.
>
> No "lie." Once again I "call it (the once great and noble ACLU)": "The
> Mexican Civil Liberties Union."
>
> > >> Lie.  The Mexican government is not a client of the ACLU.
> >
> > > The ACLU, now Mexican Civil Liberties Union, signed a "contract"
with
> > > the Mexican Government to co-litigate and even prosecute Americans,
> >
> > LIE.
>
> Not according to the numerous re****ts both Mexican and American
> already and repeatedly cited.
>
> Prove the "lie" Ramon or shut up.
>
> Besides your repeated ranting the mere stating of a date, 1999, is
> also NOT proof.

Look who's demanding proof: the idiot who cites the preamble to the
Constitution to argue that the ACLU is acting "unconstitutionally."