Nebraska attorney general refuses to file lawsuit to protect immigrants'
fair housing rights
By NATE JENKINS , Associated Press
LINCOLN, Neb. - Anne Hobbs was angry. The head of the Nebraska Equal
Op****tunity Commission had just learned of a Hispanic couple who said
their
landlord asked for their driver's licenses ¡X but didn't ask the same of
non-Hispanic tenants.
Hobbs said it sounded like the couple were "treated differently than
everybody else because of national origin," and sent the case to the
state's top prosecutor, hoping he would sue on their behalf under fair
housing laws.
When Attorney General Jon Bruning received the case, he was angry, too ¡X
for a different reason than Hobbs.
"I'm not going to use taxpayer dollars to file lawsuits for illegal
aliens," said Bruning after learning the couple was in the U.S. illegally.
"You're not going to get a free lawyer" from his office, he said, "if
you're not a citizen of this country."
Critics say Bruning's legal rationale is so off-base that he may end up in
court after all ¡X and not as a prosecutor. Immigration activists suggest
they may be laying the groundwork for a first-of-its kind lawsuit, with
Bruning as the defendant.
Bruning, a Republican who has made no secret of his ambition for higher
office, argues that the federal 1996 welfare reform law prohibits him from
providing legal services to illegal immigrants. He points to a section
that
says only legal residents should get state or local public benefits. The
law defines them to include welfare, disability and health services.
It doesn't mention legal services, but Bruning believes they are included
in wording that denies "any other similar benefit for which payments or
assistance are provided to an individual, household or family eligibility
unit."
Immigration advocates say the interpretation is unprecedented and
mean-spirited, and that discrimination should be prosecuted regardless of
the victim's immigration status.
"No public official has ever taken the position that anti-discrimination
protections are equal to welfare benefits," said Jonathan Blazer, an
attorney with the National Immigration Law Center.
The couple ultimately asked Bruning not to prosecute because they feared
it
would draw the attention of immigration authorities. Their names have not
been publicly released.
But any legal showdown over the case could help define just how far
attorneys general can push against illegal immigrants while staying on the
right side of the law.
Raul Gonzalez, legislative director of the National Council of La Raza, a
national Hispanic rights group, said Bruning's interpretation would allow
people to "run wild over immigrants."
Under Bruning's logic, he said, prosecutors would not seek justice against
someone who ran a red light and injured an illegal immigrant.
"They're basically saying it's open season on undo***ented immigrants,"
Gonzalez said.
Bruning's office said that's not the case.
"It's ridiculous to compare prosecuting criminal cases using taxpayer
dollars to filing a lawsuit seeking damages from a private citizen for the
benefit of illegal aliens," said Bruning's chief deputy, David Cookson.
Bruning agrees with the groups that the law protects illegal immigrants
from discrimination. But he said he isn't legally obligated to prosecute
on
their behalf, and that they should seek legal counsel elsewhere.
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said it is
investigating the issue, but stopped short of saying it would file a
lawsuit against Bruning. Blazer, of the National Immigration Law Center,
said his group "hasn't contemplated" legal action, but it may talk with
groups in Nebraska about how to handle the issue.
The National Council of La Raza does not file lawsuits.
Bruning's refusal to take on cases involving illegal immigrants threatens
the Nebraska Equal Op****tunity Commission's federal funding, commission
officials say.
But if the commission were to lose federal backing, the cases would be
investigated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and
prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The U.S. attorney for Nebraska, Joe Stecher, said that whether someone is
in the U.S. illegally would not figure into his decision on whether to
prosecute discrimination cases.
Ron Haskins, a former welfare adviser to President Bush who worked on the
1996 welfare overhaul as a congressional staff director, said the welfare
reform law was meant to deny legal services to illegal immigrants.
But it is appropriate to spend public money on issues that "advance the
interests of society," he said.
"If I was a citizen of the state," he said when told about Bruning's
position, "I'd think, what's in the interests of the community?"
"Even if a person is here illegally, we should enforce the law."
|
