Re: ACLU & Client, MxGov, To Sue Ice For Being Anti-Semetic

On Thu, 15 May 2008 08:34:34 -0700, "Lamont Cranston"
<Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Don Gabacho wrote:
>> On May 14, 3:07 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>> "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
>>>
news:19944420-5cb6-4a8c-9035-b4f4f9ae71fa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> > On May 14, 1:22 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
>>> > <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> Don Gabacho wrote:
>>> >> > It appears the, now, Mexican Civil Liberties Union is wrong.
>>>
>>> >> Lie.  There is no Mexican Civil Liberties Union.
>>>
>>> > There is now. It was the ACLU.
>>>
>>> LIE.
>>
>> No "lie." Once again I "call it (the once great and noble ACLU)": "The
>> Mexican Civil Liberties Union."
>
>You can call it anything that you care to, Pendejo, but it is still the 
>ACLU.
>
>>
>>> >> Lie.  The Mexican government is not a client of the ACLU.
>>>
>>> > The ACLU, now Mexican Civil Liberties Union, signed a "contract"
>>> > with the Mexican Government to co-litigate and even prosecute
>>> > Americans,
>>>
>>> LIE.
>>
>> Not according to the numerous re****ts both Mexican and American
>> already and repeatedly cited.
>
>You have cited nothing, Pendejo.

Oh, look everyone! The ignorant left wing maricon has learned a new
word.

>
>>
>> Prove the "lie" Ramon or shut up.
>
>I have already done that, Pendejo.  Oh, BTW, I am not "Ramon."  You
belief 
>that I am, however, is quite consistent with the other delusions that you

>are suffering.
>
>>
>> Besides your repeated ranting the mere stating of a date, 1999, is
>> also NOT proof.
>
>Your repeated ranting that the CNDH is part of the Mexican government is
NOT 
>proof.  You are a ****ing Mexico-obsessed lunatic.
>
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Human_Rights_Commission_(Mexico)
>
>"Mexico's National Human Rights Commission (Comisión Nacional de los 
>Derechos Humanos, or "CNDH") is a public institution that enjoys
judicial, 
>organizational and functional autonomy from the federal government.
>...
>It was not until 1999, after some constitutional reforms, that the
National 
>Human Rights Commission became fully independent of the government."
>
>
>www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-54899664.html
>"WA****NGTON, June 15 /U.S. Newswire/
>
>The following was released today by the Embassy of Mexico:
>
>Mexico's federal Chamber of Deputies sent to the Senate an initiative to 
>strengthen the National Commission for Human Rights (CNDH) and
state-level 
>similar entities. The measure, a proposal to reform article 102 of the 
>Constitution, was approved on June 2, by 417 favorable votes of the 
>500-member lower Chamber of the Mexican Congress. All political parties, 
>with the exception of the Worker's Party (PT) voted for this
constitutional 
>amendment.
>
>The proposed reform would confer full autonomy and budgetary independence
to 
>CNDH as well as to human rights commissions ..."
>
>
>
>www.sipaz.org/informes/vol4no3/vol4no3e.htm
>
>SIPAZ RE****T: Vol. IV, No. 3 - August 1999
>
>...
>
>"At the beginning of June, the CNDH itself experienced a legislative
change 
>with the approval of reforms to Article 102 of the Constitution, where it

>was granted full autonomy from the federal Executive."