

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 34 of 61 Topic 49789 of 57845
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: ACLU & Client, MxGov, To Sue Ice For Being Anti-Semetic
by "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 16, 2008 at 08:12 AM
| Don Gabacho wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 06:26:44 -0400, Dan Kimmel wrote:
>
>> "Don Gabacho" <jpastore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:2b1ffc36-3542-4c63-8eb5-78161784f601@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On May 14, 11:35 pm, Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On May 14, 1:53 pm, Don Gabacho <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On May 14, 3:07 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
>>>> > <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > > "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>news:19944420-5cb6-4a8c-9035-b4f4f9ae71fa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> > > > On May 14, 1:22 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
>>>> > > > <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> > > >> Don Gabacho wrote:
>>>> > > >> > It appears the, now, Mexican Civil Liberties Union is
>>>> > > >> > wrong.
>>>>
>>>> > > >> Lie. There is no Mexican Civil Liberties Union.
>>>>
>>>> > > > There is now. It was the ACLU.
>>>>
>>>> > > LIE.
>>>>
>>>> > No "lie." Once again I "call it (the once great and noble
>>>> > ACLU)": "The Mexican Civil Liberties Union."
>>>>
>>>> > > >> Lie. The Mexican government is not a client of the ACLU.
>>>>
>>>> > > > The ACLU, now Mexican Civil Liberties Union, signed a
>>>> > > > "contract" with the Mexican Government to co-litigate and
>>>> > > > even prosecute Americans,
>>>>
>>>> > > LIE.
>>>>
>>>> > Not according to the numerous re****ts both Mexican and American
>>>> > already and repeatedly cited.
>>>>
>>>> > Prove the "lie" Ramon or shut up.
>>>>
>>>> hint: you made a claim (lie) it's your job to prove it.
>>>>
>>>> hint: you're racist s***.
>>>
>>> And what DID this say?:
>>>
>>> SENATE APPOINTS NEW DIRECTOR TO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.
>>> Publication: SourceMex Economic News & Analysis on Mexico
>>> Date: Wednesday, November 17 1999
>>> You are viewing page 1
>>>
>>>
>>> In June of this year, Congress approved changes to the Constitution
>>> to give the CNDH greater independence.
>>
>> Glad even YOUR source agrees that the Commission is autonomous and
>> NOT part of the Mexican government.
>
> The changes as you read is supposedly moving the CNDH from Mexico's
> Executive Branch of Mexico's central government to its Senate.
LIE. The changes made CHDH autonomous, as in "independent."


|
61 Posts in Topic:
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-13 18:45:38 |
|
"f. barnes" < |
2008-05-13 21:34:32 |
|
Tim Crowley <timmyturm |
2008-05-13 21:37:52 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-13 23:00:02 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-13 23:17:47 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-14 10:22:13 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-14 10:20:52 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 12:04:38 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-14 12:07:34 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-14 18:01:07 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 23:13:03 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 13:53:00 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-14 18:02:42 |
|
Lamont Cranston <Lamon |
2008-05-14 16:48:27 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-15 08:34:34 |
|
br549@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-15 20:33:44 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-15 19:36:54 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:20:10 |
|
THE-MAGGOT@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-05-14 17:00:14 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 18:48:47 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 18:58:23 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 19:47:40 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-15 06:25:19 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-15 19:32:21 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-15 23:17:36 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:17:13 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:16:04 |
|
Tim Crowley <timmyturm |
2008-05-14 20:34:25 |
|
Tim Crowley <timmyturm |
2008-05-14 20:35:33 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 20:45:46 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-15 06:26:44 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-15 19:21:24 |
|
br549@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-15 23:57:18 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:12:51 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 21:27:24 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 21:37:03 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 21:46:21 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 22:00:39 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 22:12:16 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-16 11:54:35 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 12:30:26 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-16 11:56:13 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 12:33:26 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-16 18:21:41 |
|
Red Cloud <mmdir2005@[ |
2008-05-16 12:11:08 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-16 15:44:56 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-16 15:25:48 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-17 05:23:30 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-17 12:12:11 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-17 16:38:38 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-19 07:42:09 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-17 17:18:28 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-18 05:43:53 |
|
"johnny@[EMAIL PROTE |
2008-05-18 15:19:14 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-18 16:23:54 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-18 17:16:24 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-18 21:20:27 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-19 10:25:46 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-19 11:54:15 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-20 06:51:42 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-20 09:35:42 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|