Re: ACLU & Client, MxGov, To Sue Ice For Being Anti-Semetic

Dan Kimmel wrote:
> "Don Gabacho" <jpastore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1d4xqg11y57bd$.htp9hp2ax1p2$.dlg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 06:25:19 -0400, Dan Kimmel wrote:
>>
>> > "Don Gabacho" <jpastore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >
>
news:ea15d5e0-ba26-4604-900c-88e2ea9cf5a9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On May 14, 6:02 pm, "Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>> "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>
news:e41b5982-f27c-4f01-83c1-6498f0652fdb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 
>> > May 14, 3:07 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > > "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>
news:19944420-5cb6-4a8c-9035-b4f4f9ae71fa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> > > > On May 14, 1:22 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
>> >>> > > > <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>> > > >> Don Gabacho wrote:
>> >>> > > >> > It appears the, now, Mexican Civil Liberties Union is
>> >>> > > >> > wrong. 
>> >>>
>> >>> > > >> Lie.  There is no Mexican Civil Liberties Union.
>> >>>
>> >>> > > > There is now. It was the ACLU.
>> >>>
>> >>> > > LIE.
>> >>>
>> >>> > No "lie." Once again I "call it (the once great and noble
>> >>> > ACLU)": "The Mexican Civil Liberties Union."
>> >>>
>> >>> > > >> Lie.  The Mexican government is not a client of the ACLU.
>> >>>
>> >>> > > > The ACLU, now Mexican Civil Liberties Union, signed a
>> >>> > > > "contract" with the Mexican Government to co-litigate and
>> >>> > > > even prosecute Americans, 
>> >>>
>> >>> > > LIE.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Not according to the numerous re****ts both Mexican and American
>> >>> > already and repeatedly cited.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Prove the "lie" Ramon or shut up.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Besides your repeated ranting the mere stating of a date,
>> >>> > 1999, is also NOT proof.
>> >>>
>> >>> Look who's demanding proof: the idiot who cites the preamble to
>> >>> the Constitution to argue that the ACLU is acting
>> >>> "unconstitutionally." 
>> >>
>> >> Is this your way of diverting also; as I previously posted also:
>> >>
>> >> "It is my understanding that rabbis
>> >
>> > <Senor Gabacho's feeble attempt to change the subject snipped.>
>> >
>> > I accept your concession that you cannot provide any actual
>> > evidence that the ACLU is acting "unconstitutionally."
>>
>> It is un-Constitutional for the ACLU to make any accord and alliance
>> with a "foreign power" effecting the very soverneignty of the U.S.A..
>
> No, it isn't.  Nothing in the Constitution forbids private citizens
> from entering into contracts with foreign governments, so long as
> they do not violate US law.  Since the purpose of this contract (not
> with the Mexican government as now proved beyond a shadow of a doubt)
> is to ENFORCE U.S. law, there is nothing at all unconstitutional
> about it. 

That is absolutely correct.

>
> The demented loon Senor Gabacho can howl from now until he's
> de****ted, and it won't change that incontrovertible fact.

Pendejo Gabacho is a lunatic.