

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 18 of 61 Topic 49789 of 56360
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: ACLU & Client, MxGov, To Sue Ice For Being Anti-Semetic
by "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 16, 2008 at 08:20 AM
| Don Gabacho wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 08:34:34 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:
>
>> Don Gabacho wrote:
>>> On May 14, 3:07 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>
news:19944420-5cb6-4a8c-9035-b4f4f9ae71fa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> > On May 14, 1:22 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
>>>> > <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> >> Don Gabacho wrote:
>>>> >> > It appears the, now, Mexican Civil Liberties Union is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> >> Lie. There is no Mexican Civil Liberties Union.
>>>>
>>>> > There is now. It was the ACLU.
>>>>
>>>> LIE.
>>>
>>> No "lie." Once again I "call it (the once great and noble ACLU)":
>>> "The Mexican Civil Liberties Union."
>>
>> You can call it anything that you care to, Pendejo, but it is still
>> the ACLU.
>>
>>>
>>>> >> Lie. The Mexican government is not a client of the ACLU.
>>>>
>>>> > The ACLU, now Mexican Civil Liberties Union, signed a "contract"
>>>> > with the Mexican Government to co-litigate and even prosecute
>>>> > Americans,
>>>>
>>>> LIE.
>>>
>>> Not according to the numerous re****ts both Mexican and American
>>> already and repeatedly cited.
>>
>> You have cited nothing, Pendejo.
>>
>>>
>>> Prove the "lie" Ramon or shut up.
>>
>> I have already done that, Pendejo. Oh, BTW, I am not "Ramon." You
>> belief that I am, however, is quite consistent with the other
>> delusions that you are suffering.
>>
>>>
>>> Besides your repeated ranting the mere stating of a date, 1999, is
>>> also NOT proof.
>>
>> Your repeated ranting that the CNDH is part of the Mexican
>> government is NOT proof. You are a ****ing Mexico-obsessed lunatic.
>>
>> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Human_Rights_Commission_(Mexico)
>>
>> "Mexico's National Human Rights Commission (Comisión Nacional de los
>> Derechos Humanos, or "CNDH") is a public institution that enjoys
>> judicial, organizational and functional autonomy from the federal
>> government. ...
>> It was not until 1999, after some constitutional reforms, that the
>> National Human Rights Commission became fully independent of the
>> government."
>>
>>
>> www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-54899664.html
>> "WA****NGTON, June 15 /U.S. Newswire/
>>
>> The following was released today by the Embassy of Mexico:
>
> Doesn't that tell you anything? "The Embassy of Mexico"?
>
> The National so-called Commission on Human Rights of the Mexican
> Government, founded, funded and appointed to this day by the Mexican
> Government is and remains Mexican Government.
LIE. The CNDH was granted autonomy in 1999. Even if it weren't, there is
nothing wrong with a private company or organization contracting with a
foreign government. I work for a U.S. company that has a contract with
the
Canadian government. Is that unconstitutional or illegal?
Face it, Pendejo, you are wrong...again.


|
61 Posts in Topic:
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-13 18:45:38 |
|
"f. barnes" < |
2008-05-13 21:34:32 |
|
Tim Crowley <timmyturm |
2008-05-13 21:37:52 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-13 23:00:02 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-13 23:17:47 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-14 10:22:13 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-14 10:20:52 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 12:04:38 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-14 12:07:34 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-14 18:01:07 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 23:13:03 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 13:53:00 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-14 18:02:42 |
|
Lamont Cranston <Lamon |
2008-05-14 16:48:27 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-15 08:34:34 |
|
br549@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-15 20:33:44 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-15 19:36:54 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:20:10 |
|
THE-MAGGOT@[EMAIL PROTECT |
2008-05-14 17:00:14 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 18:48:47 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 18:58:23 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 19:47:40 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-15 06:25:19 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-15 19:32:21 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-15 23:17:36 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:17:13 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:16:04 |
|
Tim Crowley <timmyturm |
2008-05-14 20:34:25 |
|
Tim Crowley <timmyturm |
2008-05-14 20:35:33 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 20:45:46 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-15 06:26:44 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-15 19:21:24 |
|
br549@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-15 23:57:18 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 08:12:51 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 21:27:24 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 21:37:03 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 21:46:21 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 22:00:39 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-14 22:12:16 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-16 11:54:35 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 12:30:26 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-16 11:56:13 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-16 12:33:26 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-16 18:21:41 |
|
Red Cloud <mmdir2005@[ |
2008-05-16 12:11:08 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-16 15:44:56 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-16 15:25:48 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-17 05:23:30 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-17 12:12:11 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-17 16:38:38 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-19 07:42:09 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-17 17:18:28 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-18 05:43:53 |
|
"johnny@[EMAIL PROTE |
2008-05-18 15:19:14 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-18 16:23:54 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-18 17:16:24 |
|
"Dan Kimmel" &l |
2008-05-18 21:20:27 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-19 10:25:46 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-19 11:54:15 |
|
Don Gabacho <jpastore@ |
2008-05-20 06:51:42 |
|
"Lamont Cranston&quo |
2008-05-20 09:35:42 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|