Re: ACLU & Client, MxGov, To Sue Ice For Being Anti-Semetic

On May 16, 3:33 pm, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Don Gabacho wrote:
> > On May 16, 11:20 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> > > Don Gabacho wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 15 May 2008 08:34:34 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote:
>
> > > >> Don Gabacho wrote:
> > > >>> On May 14, 3:07 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
> > > >>> <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >>>> "Don Gabacho" <jpast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >
>>>>news:19944420-5cb6-4a8c-9035-b4f4f9ae71fa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > >>>> > On May 14, 1:22 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
> > > >>>> > <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >>>> >> Don Gabacho wrote:
> > > >>>> >> > It appears the, now, Mexican Civil Liberties Union is
> > > >>>> >> > wrong.
>
> > > >>>> >> Lie.  There is no Mexican Civil Liberties Union.
>
> > > >>>> > There is now. It was the ACLU.
>
> > > >>>> LIE.
>
> > > >>> No "lie." Once again I "call it (the once great and noble
> > > >>> ACLU)": "The Mexican Civil Liberties Union."
>
> > > >> You can call it anything that you care to, Pendejo, but it is
> > > >> still the ACLU.
>
> > > >>>> >> Lie.  The Mexican government is not a client of the ACLU.
>
> > > >>>> > The ACLU, now Mexican Civil Liberties Union, signed a
> > > >>>> > "contract" with the Mexican Government to co-litigate and
> > > >>>> > even prosecute Americans,
>
> > > >>>> LIE.
>
> > > >>> Not according to the numerous re****ts both Mexican and American
> > > >>> already and repeatedly cited.
>
> > > >> You have cited nothing, Pendejo.
>
> > > >>> Prove the "lie" Ramon or shut up.
>
> > > >> I have already done that, Pendejo.  Oh, BTW, I am not "Ramon."
> > > >> You belief that I am, however, is quite consistent with the other
> > > >> delusions that you are suffering.
>
> > > >>> Besides your repeated ranting the mere stating of a date, 1999,
> > > >>> is also NOT proof.
>
> > > >> Your repeated ranting that the CNDH is part of the Mexican
> > > >> government is NOT proof.  You are a ****ing Mexico-obsessed
> > > >> lunatic.
>
> > > >> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Human_Rights_Commission_(Mexico)
>
> > > >> "Mexico's National Human Rights Commission (Comisi=F3n Nacional
de
> > > >> los Derechos Humanos, or "CNDH") is a public institution that
> > > >> enjoys judicial, organizational and functional autonomy from the
> > > >> federal government. ...
> > > >> It was not until 1999, after some constitutional reforms, that
> > > >> the National Human Rights Commission became fully independent of
> > > >> the government."
>
> > > >>www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-54899664.html
> > > >> "WA****NGTON, June 15 /U.S. Newswire/
>
> > > >> The following was released today by the Embassy of Mexico:
>
> > > > Doesn't that tell you anything? "The Embassy of Mexico"?
>
> > > > The National so-called Commission on Human Rights of the Mexican
> > > > Government, founded, funded and appointed to this day by the
> > > > Mexican Government is and remains Mexican Government.
>
> > > LIE.  The CNDH was granted autonomy in 1999.  Even if it weren't,
> > > there is nothing wrong with a private company or organization
> > > contracting with a foreign government.  I work for a U.S. company
> > > that has a contract with the Canadian government.   Is that
> > > unconstitutional or illegal?
>
> > > Face it, Pendejo, you are wrong...again.
>
> > The CNDH was not made independent in 1999 or any other time, nor is it
> > a "private" company.
>
> > Why, Ramon, are you and Herr Kimmler so obsessed with denying this
> > simple truth?
>
> Again, Pendejo, mi nombre no es Ramon.

OK Ramon.

> You are the one denying the truth.
>
> But, let's say that the CNDH is a part of the Mexican government.  I
work
> for a company that contracts with a part of the Canadian government.  Is
> that illegal or unconstitutional?

Not if the contracts infringes, much less as the ACLU's accord with
the National so-called Commission on Human Rights of the Mexican
Government even declares itself to do, on the very soveriegnty of the
U.S.A. which includes the U.S. judicial system.

Moreover, and twice again, there are flagrant violations of "conflict
of interest" precepts---ALSO---involved which negate any argument even
as spurious as yours as to the governmental status of the CNDH or the
so-called "private persons" arguments of the CNDH and ACLU and even
alone should disbar the ACLU from every courtroom in the land.

>  Of course, it's not.  So, the ACLU, being
> a private organization, can contract with anybody that it wants to. 
Case
> closed.  You are wrong...again.

You're not just an idiot. You are a malicious one at that---Ramon.