Re: How to REALLY cut US taxes

Tim May wrote:
> In article <1211337589_2806@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, strabo <strabo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> mariposas rand mair fheal wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <d1b495f8-152d-4d4f-9a02-9d5966c5b96b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>  Greg Brown <gregvbrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes you do, you are just making a lame excuse to attempt to
cir***vent
>>>> the law.
>>> its a trick to bypass the sixth amendment
>>>
>>> the old rule was it was up to state to prove you did something wrong
>>> instead of you proving didnt
>>>
>> 1. The presence of an undo***ented foreign national within the US
>>     is unlawful. If said presence is intentional it is prima facia
>>     evidence of illegality.
>>
>> 2. There's nothing for the state to prove because charges need
>>     not be brought to effect de****tation of illegal aliens.
> 
> I routinely travel without any "do***entation."
> 

So do I. We don't fit the profile.


 >
> I am not required to travel with do***entation. These united states do
> not have any requirements for "papers" or "do***entation" to be carried
> or produced, save for specific cir***stances, such as flying aircraft
> or driving cars. A person walking about, or working, or bicycling, or
> lounging on the beach need not have "do***entation" on his or her
> person. 
>

That's right, you're not required to travel with do***entation. You
don't have to, you're not an illegal alien.


> 
> Disagree with this? Fine. Move to Myanmar, or Austria, or China, where
> do***enttion is required.
> 
> If, as it appears, you are claiming that "there is nothing for the
> state to prove" before they de****t me, I hope you are in the same
> Federal Building they are when a truckload of Astrolite/ANFO
> obliterates a thousand of them if I am ever "de****ted."
> 
> **** the U.S. **** fake patriots like Strabo.
> 
> 
> Sixty million need a fair trial and then a trip up the chimneys. At
> this point, more so-called Republicans will get the gas than will
> Democraps.
> 

Let's send them all up.

 >
> --Tim May
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>  >
>>> the state is not directly dealing with the employee
>>> so they can pretend the sixth is not applicable
>>>
>>> it is the employer threatened with legal action
>>> so either the employer challenges the law
>>> when there is no benefit to employer and only risk
>>> or the employer force it on the employee as if it job requirement
>>> instead of placing the burden of proof on the employee
>>>
>>> the solution is to put further burdens on employees
>>> and further undermine the presumption of innocence and their privacy
>>> and that people motivated to bypass the law
>>> will continue to do so as before
>>>
>>> but at least legislator can point to all the crap they force people
through
>>> and pretend that they are actually effective in solving the problem
they
>>> created
>>>
>> Having ANY dealings with a KNOWN illegal alien is aiding and abetting
>> a crime.
>>
>> That's why employers are culpable.
>>
>>
>>
>>> see also - the war on drugs
>>>
>>> arf meow arf  -  everything thing i know i learned
>>> from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins
>>> sacramento - political pigsty of the western world
>>> or a babys arm holding an apple
>>
>> ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
>> News==----
>> http://www.pronews.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
>> ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---