Talk About Network

Google





Government > Communism in India > Suggesting an I...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 554 of 576
Post > Topic >>

Suggesting an Internet petition for kicking the USA out of the UN

by rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rolf Martens) Apr 9, 2008 at 07:31 PM

At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under "News with
brief 
comments":
 

Wednesday, 09 April 2008 (NWBC 363) Suggesting an Internet petition for
kicking 
the USA out of the UN

2008-04-09, 19:00 GMT:

I've earlier today sent three (replying) e-mails, as follows - except for
the 
quoted text in the first and third of them being abbreviated considerably
here.


Replying e-mail 1 of 3 today,

[QUOTE:]

From:
Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Date:
Wed, 09 April 2008 08:45 GMT
 
To:
Romi Elnagar <bluesapphire48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Cc:
modern marxism <modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
<marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; mot krig <mot_krig@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; 
USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; 
MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>;
maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
<maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Subject:
Re: ["Iran attack" +] A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers activist
Waistline 
by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira
 

Thank you for your kind words about my article, Hajja - and yes, you're
quite 
right in saying that all that talk, by the US imperialists, of a
"possible" war 
of aggression of theirs against Iran, already in itself is dangerous.
 
In fact it's even more than that, isn't it. Those threats that they have
been 
uttering, publicly - helped and sup****ted in this too by some phony"left" 
pur****ted adversaries of theirs, - are also directly ILLEGAL, according to
the 
UN Charter, which does not allow any state to behave like that.
 
One idea, a suggestion, of mine I'd like to put to you now, Hajja - after
first 
some lines of arguing for it: 
 
I on my part already earlier have suggested - as of course only one grain
of 
sand in the desert, but why not gather international sup****t for this
among 
ordinary people, above all? - KICK THE USA OUT OF THE UN!
 
That was the title of a "UNITE! Info" of mine, the #173en of that series,
sent 
out on 06.07.2002, and now at my homepage, at: 
http://www.rolf-martens.com/UNITE%21%20Infos/U%21%20%23173en/U%21%20%23173en.tx
t. 
 
Already then there were ample grounds for such an action, by the
international 
community.
 
I noted, back in 2002, some things which were publicly well-known and
infamous, 
and some which were not all that openly visible but which it was possible
to 
conclude with great certainty were serious crimes by the leader****p of
that 
state too - these 13 or so crimes (summarized by me then in only 4 points
but 
there were many more):
 
01. That state's flagrant aggression against Afghanistan
 
02. Its leaders' criminally orchestrating the infamous terror attacks in
the 
USA itself on 11.09.2001, killing some 3,000 people, which they, further,
not 
only turned into an excuse - in the infamous "tradition" of the Nazi's 
Reichstag fire in 1993 (etc) - for the abovementioned aggression against a

far-away and poor country, but turned into excuses for oppressing and 
terrorizing, firstly, "their own" people even more, and, secondly, the
people 
in all other countries too.
 
(I didn't mention, in that Info, their likewise vile terror attack, in the
same 
immediate context, also against the AZF factory in Touloun, France, on 
21.09.2001, which killed some 40 people, injured 2,400 more and devastated
not 
only that fertilizer-producing plant itself but large parts of the entire 
Touloun too - this after the then French president, Chiraq, had made clear
that 
France was *not* going to sup****t arbitrary aggressions by the US
imperialists 
and thus was "not with us; therefore against us", as those war criminals
with 
already a quite long record at that time were characterizing such
standpoints. 
I did write about this in my Infos ##154en-156en, in September-October
2001, 
however. You didn't have to be a "Sherlock" to figure out that this event
was 
not "an accident", and who in fact were the guilty terrorists in that case

too.)  
 
03. Openly-uttered war threats, already then (in mid-2002), against Iraq,
and a 
genocidal blockade against that country since several years back
 
04. Openly-uttered war threats, already then, against Iran
 
05. Openly-uttered war threats, already then, against the Democratic
People's 
Republic of Korea
 
06. The instigation and sup****t, by the government of the USA, of the 
largescale and genocidal war of aggression against the DR Congo from
August 
1998 on - a war which had already then killed over 4 million people
 
07. The instigation and sup****t of the war against Palestine and the
occupation 
of that country from 1948 on, with massive bloodshed continuing each year.

Also a number of smaller wars of aggression, of a similar type.
 
08. The flagrant aggression against and the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999
 
09. The sabotaging and sinking of the passenger ****p "Estonia" in the
Baltic on 
28.09.1994, killing 856 people, among whom some 500 from Sweden. (This I
in 
that Info only charcterized as "most likely" another act of terrorism by
the 
government of the USA, but there really is certainty about the culprits in
this 
case too. One lawyer of a number of survivors, for instance, H. Witte,
openly 
and quite independently of me - who happen to know about a certain thing
which 
no doubt was an im****tant part of the motive behind this (massively
covered-up) 
crime  - has pointed to them as such, in a book of his. Another thing
which I 
noted in that Info, and in my #008en [part 1/5 etc] too, as "most likely"
a 
crime by the same people, was a "strange" fire, in a certain political 
situation, at the air****t of Düsseldorf, Germany, on 11.04.1996, which
killed 
11 people. That one I'm letting stand now as "only" a "most likely".)
 
Today, almost 6 years after that Info, there are some further things to
add, of 
course:
 
10. The flagrant aggression against Iraq from March 2003 on (a
particularly 
infamous, big and clearly visible thing)
 
And there are some no less im****tant cases of *sneak* warfare against the 
m***** of people in the world:
 
11. The entire "green" (anti-industrial) warfare, engaged in above all by
the 
government of the USA (since the early 1970s, and more and more intensive
for 
each year that p***** - this has killed many more people and caused much
more 
material destruction than all its openly-violent aggressions in that same
time 
taken together)
 
12. The terror campaign with non-existing "HIV" and "AIDS", orchestrated
since 
the early/mid-1980s above all by the US military's "EIS" ("Epidemic 
Intelligence Service"), a "CIA within medicine", and also co-organized by
the 
better-known CIA itself, which so far likewise has killed millions and
maimed 
further millions
 
13. The attempted terror campaign (likewise "EIS"-directed), parallel to
the 
abovementioned, with "bird flu" and a non-existing "virus H5N1", in
2005-2006, 
which did cause considerable damage and the death of some 100-200 people
before 
it was more or less totally exposed as a "War of the USA against Humanity"
- as 
was part of the title of one im****tant book published in Germany - in the 
spring of 2006.
 
In the 1930s, the then fascist-ruled Italy was expelled from the League of

Nations (the predecessor of the UN), on account of its aggression against 
Ethiopia from 1935 on.
 
The crimes of the present-day regime in the USA of course are incomparably

bigger than that.of the Italian one in the 1930s.
 
Why should a country, under such a regime, be allowed to stay in the UN?
Making 
a total mockery, then, of the entire UN Charter, which does contain, on
paper 
at least, some not unim****tant principles of international democracy and
peace?
 
It should be KICKED OUT, I say. And of course everybody knows that the
rather 
similar (though much smaller-time) reactionary governments in the
so-called 
"rich", likewise internationally-exploiting, countries, would raise some
rather 
loud howls and yells against such a suggestion, if it were advanced by a
larger 
number of people. But that would not change the fact, I think, that one
should 
seek such sup****t. Perhaps even some governments of the poorer countries
might 
be willing to give it some direct or indirect sup****t. And probably many
people 
in the USA itself.
 
Which leads me to something which I'm proposing to you now, Hajji: Let's
you 
and me set up an *Internet petition,* directed to the UN General Assembly
and 
saying:
 
"KICK THE USA OUT OF THE UN!"
 
I have a little experience with such petitions - two in Swedish and one in

English I've been in on before, which in all those cases, true enough, 
collected only few signatures, but were not quite insignificant anyway.
They're 
from 2003, 2004 respectively earlier this year, 2008, and can all still be
seen 
on the Net, here:
 
http://www.petitiononline.com/RelMSeek/petition.html
 
http://www.petitiononline.com/SaveBbNP/petition.html
 
http://www.petitiononline.com/CraDoPak/petition.html
 
A petition created by the two of us, say - you don't have to be many
people 
just to start such a thing - and continuing to be open for signing for
several 
years, with a rather short argumentation for it included as an explaining
text 
(for which signatories would not be responsible) - wouldn't that have good

chances of collecting quite a lot of signatures, by people in many
countries, 
and wouldn't it have a good propaganda effect too?
 
So what do you say, Hajja? If you're interested, we could discuss
privately 
what more concretely to write and how to organize this thing - it needn't
take 
all that much effort, and there's no hurry to set up such a thing up
either. (I 
on my part shall be relatively busy now in April, will have more time in
May). 
And if you have some friends who're (also) interested, all the better, of 
course. But two people, that's really sufficient for organizing such
things, 
when you know that many will like an idea that you have - this is one of
the 
big advantages with the Internet.
 
Hereby this suggestion, thus! And I'm sending this reply of mine to
several 
mailing lists too, of course.
 
Rolf
(Malmö, Sweden
www.rolf-martens.com)
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Romi Elnagar 
To: Rolf Martens 
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: ["Iran attack" +] A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers
activist 
Waistline by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira


Rolf,
 
Your article is excellent, and I agree with most of it.
 
I have two concerns, though, about the war-mongering against Iran.  First,
is 
that by beating the drums of war too loudly, the war-mongering class in 
AmeriKKKa may find it almost impossible to back down.  Is it possible that
it 
might become politically NECESSARY to wage war on Iran simply because the 
war-mongerers have been talking about it for so long?  I really don't
know.
 
The other danger in war talk is, of course, what I call the Dr.
Strangelove" 
option, the possibility that some "loose cannon" lower down on the chain
of 
command will take all this talk seriously and start a nuclear exchange all
by 
himself.  I do not think that this is at all impossible.  Several months
ago, 
there was quite a flap here in the US when it was revealed that nuclear
weapons 
were sent from Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana without (apparently) 
proper controls being exercised.
 
So, while we may safely assume that the rulers of Iran and the rulers of 
AmeriKKKa are coordinating their public dance of sabre-rattling, there are

simply too many possibilities for something to go wrong.  
 
That, IMHO, is why all this war talk is so dangerous.
 
Peace,
Hajja Romi

Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I still think, Romi, that that particular "wolf", of an attack by US 
imperialism on Iran, will *not* come. On why, see my "UNITE! Info #257en:
Why 
the talk of 'nuclear strikes against Iran'", from as far back as
16.04.2006, at 
http://www.rolf-martens.com/UNITE%21%20Infos/webstyle1/unite_info_257en.html.
 
Rolf M.
Malmö, Sweden
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Romi Elnagar 
To: Rolf Martens 
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers activist Waistline by 
small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19684.htm
 
Petraeus Testimony Next Week Will Signal Iran Attack
By Paul Craig Roberts
06/04/08 "ICH' -- - April 5, 2008.  Today the London Telegraph re****ted
that 
“British officials gave warning yesterday that America’s commander in Iraq
will 
declare that Iran is waging war against the US-backed Baghdad government. 
A 
strong statement from General David Petraeus about Iran’s intervention in
Iraq 
could set the stage for a US attack on Iranian militiary facilities,
according 
to a Whitehall *****sment.”  

[A large piece of text snipped in this NWBC item]


Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under "News with
brief 
comments":
 
 
Sunday, 06 April 2008 (NWBC 361) A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers 
activist Waistline by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. 
Moreira
 
2008-04-06, 21:33 GMT:

[A large piece of text snipped in this NWBC item. It was brought in full
in 
NWBC 361, of 06.04.2008.]

[END OF QUOTE]



Replying e-mail 2 of 3 today,

[QUOTE:]

From:
Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Date:
Wed, 09 April 2008 10:16 GMT
 
To:
Romi Elnagar <bluesapphire48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Cc:
modern marxism <modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
<marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; mot krig <mot_krig@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; 
USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; 
MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>;
maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
<maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Subject:
Re: ["Iran attack" +] A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers activist
Waistline 
by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira
 


I forgot to mention, Hajja, one more reason why the USA should be kicked
out of 
the UN:
 
14. Its government's organizing the assassination of Swedish Foreign
Minister 
Anna Lindh on 10.09.2003. See several "UNITE! Infos" at my homepage from
late 
2003 and from 2004, and the mailing list "Mordet på Anna Lindh", with some

texts also in English, at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mordetpalindh/,
plus 
the already mentioned Internet petition at 
http://www.petitiononline.com/RelMSeek/petition.html.
 
Rolf
(Malmö, Sweden
www.rolf-martens.com)
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Rolf Martens 
To: Romi Elnagar 
Cc: modern marxism ; marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ; mot krig ; 
USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ; MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ;
maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: ["Iran attack" +] A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers
activist 
Waistline by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira


Thank you for your kind words about my article, Hajja - and yes, you're
quite 
right in saying that all that talk, by the US imperialists, of a
"possible" war 
of aggression of theirs against Iran, already in itself is dangerous.
 
In fact it's even more than that, isn't it. Those threats that they have
been 
uttering, publicly - helped and sup****ted in this too by some phony"left" 
pur****ted adversaries of theirs, - are also directly ILLEGAL, according to
the 
UN Charter, which does not allow any state to behave like that.
 
One idea, a suggestion, of mine I'd like to put to you now, Hajja - after
first 
some lines of arguing for it: 
 
I on my part already earlier have suggested - as of course only one grain
of 
sand in the desert, but why not gather international sup****t for this
among 
ordinary people, above all? - KICK THE USA OUT OF THE UN!
 
That was the title of a "UNITE! Info" of mine, the #173en of that series,
sent 
out on 06.07.2002, and now at my homepage, at: 
http://www.rolf-martens.com/UNITE%21%20Infos/U%21%20%23173en/U%21%20%23173en.tx
t. 
 
Already then there were ample grounds for such an action, by the
international 
community.


[END OF QUOTE]



Replying e-mail 3 of 3 today,

[QUOTE:]

From:
Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Date:
Wed, 09 april 2008 18:13 GMT
 
To:
Romi Elnagar <bluesapphire48@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Cc:
modern marxism <modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
<marxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; mot krig <mot_krig@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; 
USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <USQuagmire@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; 
MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <MaoZeDong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>;
maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
<maoist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
Subject:
Re: ["Iran attack" +] A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers activist
Waistline 
by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira
 

Fair enough, Hajja. (And it was I who wrote that the "depleted uranium"
issue 
was a "red herring".) I shall probably return on this at some point or
other 
later, then, and pester you some more!
 
(I've trimmed away most of the earlier quoted text here, and once more it
also 
goes to some mailing lists.)
 
All the best,
Rolf
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Romi Elnagar 
To: Rolf Martens 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: ["Iran attack" +] A ridiculous attack on the pro-workers
activist 
Waistline by small-time reactionary "MLL" mob member Charles F. Moreira


Dear Rolf,
 
Thanks for your offer of a petition about the US and the UN.
 
I have to be honest with you, though.  Right now I am a little busy with
spring 
planting in my garden.  It is really im****tant to me because, first of
all, I 
think this economy is not in recession, it's beginning a depression, and 
yes--it's all about greed on Wall Street.
 
More im****tantly, this garden project is getting me away from the
computer.  I 
have been increasinly unwilling to face the mass of emails about
US/Israeli 
atrocities, etc. etc. and in fact I can hardly bear to think about it any
more. 
 I need a break.
 
So, for right now, I am going to decline your offer.  Actually, I already
work 
on petitions on that website, because a friend and I have been posting 
petitions on behalf of individual prisoners at Guantanamo.  Her name is
Linda 
Richard and she has a blog at freedetainees.org, if you are interested.
 
I also have a small Yahoo! group called American Conscience.  I would have

invited you, but I figured you were busy.  Also, I started it after
putting 
together a group about depleted uranium.  If I recall correctly (and I
have to 
confess that after my stroke, my memory isn't that good), you told me that
the 
DU issue was a red herring.  If this isn't right, maybe I have mixed you
up 
with someone else.
 
At any rate, American Conscience keeps me pretty busy when I am online. 
It is 
meant to be a meeting place for people concerned about American abuses of 
power, whatever their religious or political persuasion.  The only
restriction 
is that we are nonviolent.  Here in the US, I believe that is the ONLY way
that 
capitalism can be confronted, at least for the foreseeable future.  Any
idea 
thatt blowing up bridges or kidnapping cor****ate executives will convince
the 
American people that our leaders are the most evil, corrupt, insane rulers
in 
history is crazy.
 
I do think your petition has merit, so perhaps when I feel a little more 
enthused about confronting the monster, I will join you.
 
Best,
Hajja Romi

Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

Thank you for your kind words about my article, Hajja - and yes, you're
quite 
right in saying that all that talk, by the US imperialists, of a
"possible" war 
of aggression of theirs against Iran, already in itself is dangerous.
 
In fact it's even more than that, isn't it. Those threats that they have
been 
uttering, publicly - helped and sup****ted in this too by some phony"left" 
pur****ted adversaries of theirs, - are also directly ILLEGAL, according to
the 
UN Charter, which does not allow any state to behave like that.
 
One idea, a suggestion, of mine I'd like to put to you now, Hajja - after
first 
some lines of arguing for it: 
 
I on my part already earlier have suggested - as of course only one grain
of 
sand in the desert, but why not gather international sup****t for this
among 
ordinary people, above all? - KICK THE USA OUT OF THE UN!

[A large piece of text snipped in this NWBC item]

[END OF QUOTE]


_____________________

Message posted by:
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Suggesting an Internet petition for kicking the USA out of the
rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-09 19:31:11 
Re: Suggesting an Internet petition for kicking the USA out of t
"free.tuneup@[EMAIL   2008-04-09 15:01:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 4:38:51 PST 2009.