At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under "News with
brief
comments":
Saturday, 19 April 2008 (NWBC 366) Internet writer
US-government-lackey-parrot-matta reveals his (or its) true character
2008-04-19,07:16 GMT:
On 01.04, the mailing list "Modern Marxism" managed by me at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modern_marxism/
was joined by a, since some
time
back, rather prolific writer to some mailing lists and to some Usenet
newsgroups, glparramatta <glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, and was welcomed
on
02.04. by me as a new list member.
After an initial brief exchange between us, I on 14.04 published my
"UNITE!
Info #315en: Longer reply (1) to 'Green-Left' glparramatta - On nuclear
energy", then still proceeding from the assumption, which there so far had
appeared nothing to refute, that that writer, whether a person or an
organization, was basically a sincere one, really striving to further the
common interests of the vast majority of all people.
Some later statements sent (i.a.) to the MM list by glparramatta however
have
made it clear that he, or it, is something quite different, as indicated
in the
header above. For showing this to others too, I'm reproducing here four
recent
postings to MM.
The third of these, one from <glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, was
undersigned
"Norm" (a name which I had not seen in earlier postings from that address;
none
of those had been undersigned by any person), and also talked of some
people
referred to as "us", whom the (then) writer asked me to "spare" "the
childish
abuse". By this he may have meant some others in a group or an
organization
responsible for the postings from that address, I think. But perhaps he
instead
just wanted his readers to believe that there were some others, or "third
persons" (if so, unclear what persons), "on behalf of whom" he was
writing.
It still seems to be unclear, thus, whether that
US-government-lackey-parrot-matta, the writer with the address
<glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, is a person (if so, one with first name
Norm)
or some group of people forming an organization.
In any case, his/its character clearly *is* a such as that indicated here.
Those four postings to MM which I mentioned read in full, with their
respective
list message numbers shown first, and all dates and times in CET:
POSTING 1 OF 4:
List message:
#1606
From:
glparramatta <glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date:
Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:53 am
Subject:
Zimbabwe socialists: `Only mass mobilisation can defeat the Mugabe
dictator****p' | Links
The massive performance of MDC(T) partly vindicates those who were arguing
that
something was happening in the electorate and therefore it was necessary
to
participate in the elections]. However, our central positions remain
intact. If
the MDC(T) is correct that it won the presidential election by an absolute
majority, yet ZANU-PF is insisting that there will be a run-off, this
confirms
our basic argument that the regime would remain in power by hook or crook,
unless otherwise compelled by mass mobilisation. Further our other basic
position of the likelihood of an elitist and neoliberal deal around a
government of national unity remains most likely. Despite the massive vote
for
the removal of the ZANU-PF dictator****p by the m*****, and for change, the
elites who now dominate the MDC(T) are likely to cut a deal with the
regime.
Full article at http://links.org.au/node/352
Subscribe free to /Links -
International Journal of Socialist Renewal/ - at
http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=343373
POSTING 2 OF 4:
List message:
#1621
From:
"foreanaer1995" <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date:
Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:36 am
Subject:
Re: Zimbabwe socialists: `Only mass mobilisation can defeat the Mugabe
dictator****p' | Links
Already the subject line of this posting seems to show pretty clearly what
you
are, US-government-lackey-parrot-matta.
Rolf
--- In modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
glparramatta <glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
The massive performance of MDC(T) partly vindicates those who were arguing
that
something was happening in the electorate and therefore it was necessary
to
participate in the elections]. However, our central positions remain
intact.
....
POSTING 3 OF 4:
List message:
#1623
From:
"glparramatta" <glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date:
Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:52 am
Subject:
Re: Zimbabwe socialists: `Only mass mobilisation can defeat the Mugabe
dictator****p' | Links
Grow up, Rolf. These are the views of Zimbabwe's socialists, who must
daily
face the wrath of their authoritarian capitalist government. Unlike some
in
comfy Sweden! If you can't offer solidarity, at least seriously consider
their
analysis and spare us the childish abuse.
Norm.
--- In modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"foreanaer1995" <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Already the subject line of this posting seems to show pretty clearly what
you
are, US-government-lackey-parrot-matta.
Rolf
POSTING 4 OF 4:
List message:
#1625
From:
"foreanaer1995" <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date:
Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:59 am
Subject:
Re: Zimbabwe socialists: `Only mass mobilisation can defeat the Mugabe
dictator****p' | Links
Pretty funny, US-government-lackey-parrot-matta! You actually are
"telling" me
- or "ordering" me, on behalf of your miserable mass murdering masters in
the
world, what? - to "grow down".
And yes, how cute isn't it to read *your* "informing" people here about
who are
*capitalists* and who are "socialists" in Zimbabwe! It's the *other*
US-government-lackey-parrot-mattas who're the latter, right? Not many will
believe that childish fairytale, I'm certain. There are many articles, by
people who know these things quite well, which you can find on this
mailing
list too, for instance, and which refute that swindle attempt of yours
quite
clearly.
"Green-*'left'*" indeed!, are you calling yourself, while turning out to
have
a *very* rightwing standpoint, on the issue of Zimbabwe, for instance.
And it's suitable to mention too, in this context, I think, that your very
first posting to this maíling list, its list message #1466, I really
failed to
read properly, only getting that quite positive impression I noted in my
reply,
by glancing at its header and its first few lines.
I thus didn't notice that, concerning Tibet, you were *not* opposing the
US
imperialists' nasty troublemaking there, but on the contrary *sup****ting*
it,
with a slogan "Free Tibet!"[!!], for *severing off* that province from
China
(whose ruling revisionists of course are no friends of mine either).
And concerning Kosovo you did *not* oppose, as I had expected that you'd
do,
seeing "Kosova" in your header, the US imperialists' and others' likewise
vile
striving to sever off that province from Serbia, but wrote that it was
"the
imperialists" that were "against"[!!] such a severing-off.
Two other points, thus, on which you precisely, as it happens, have spoken
out
for things which are in the interests of the US imperialists, above all,
and in
those of not many other arch-reactionaries.
All this on account of ignorance on you part, perhaps, parrot-matta?
After reading that recent posting of yours now, I think not.
You "don't want" abuse? I think you actually deserve some more of that
commodity too.
Rolf
--- In modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"glparramatta" <glparramatta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Grow up, Rolf. These are the views of Zimbabwe's socialists, who must
daily
face the wrath of their authoritarian capitalist government. Unlike some
in
comfy Sweden! If you can't offer solidarity, at least seriously consider
their
analysis and spare us the childish abuse.
Norm.
--- In modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"foreanaer1995" <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Already the subject line of this posting seems to show pretty clearly what
you
are, US-government-lackey-parrot-matta.
Rolf
_____________________
Message posted by:
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
