Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Italian Government > Islam provides ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 296 of 360
Post > Topic >>

Islam provides only one prime source of information on Muhammad and the formation of Islam written within two centuries of the time he lived and it was conceived. Ishaq's Sira, or Biography, stands alone - a singular and tenuous thread connecting us to a

by "antraique" <amarita@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 14, 2007 at 08:05 AM

Islam provides only one prime source of information on Muhammad and the 
formation of Islam written within two centuries of the time he lived and
it 
was conceived. Ishaq's Sira, or Biography, stands alone - a singular and 
tenuous thread connecting us to a very troubled man and time. Over the
next 
two hundred years, other Hadith Collections were compiled by the likes of 
Tabari, Bukhari, and Muslim. Their assemblages of oral re****ts, or 
Traditions, were said to have been inspired by Allah. They pur****t to
convey 
Muhammad's words and example. They also explain the Qur'an - a book so 
deficient in context and chronology, it can only be understood when seen 
through the eyes of the Sunnah writers.

Throughout Prophet of Doom, I have been less concerned with the validity
of 
these sources than with what they have to say. Their message is all
Muslims 
have. Together, the Sunnah and Qur'an are Islam. Therefore, I was willing
to 
take them at face value.

But you don't have to dig very deep to find the truth. Even a cursory 
reading of the Qur'an is sufficient to prove that it is a fraud. There is
no 
way the creator of the universe wrote a book devoid of context, without 
chronology or intelligent transitions. Such a creative spirit wouldn't
need 
to plagiarize. He would know history and science and thus wouldn't have
made 
such a fool of himself. The God who created man wouldn't deceive him or
lead 
him to hell as Allah does. Nor would he order men to terrorize, mutilate, 
rob, enslave, and slaughter the followers of other Scriptures he claims he

revealed, wiping them out to the last. One doesn't need a scholastic
review 
of the Qur'anic text to disprove its veracity. It destroys itself quite 
nicely.

While that remains true, I believe that I owe it to readers, especially 
Muslims, to explore the textual evidence for the Sunnah and Qur'an. I'll 
start with what the Hadith has to say about the Qur'an's origins, but I'm 
going to dispense in short order with the circular reasoning Islamic 
scholars use in that they all quote the Sunnah. While there are Hadiths
that 
say Bakr tried to assemble the Qur'an and others that credit Uthman, 
Muhammad's third successor, it's like using the results of Carbon-14
dating 
to prove the validity of Carbon-14 dating. The source is the same.

In Bukhari's Hadith Collection alone we find a sea of disturbing and 
contradictory claims regarding the compilation of Allah's book. There were

differing versions, even in Muhammad's day: "Ibn Abbas asked, 'Which of
the 
two readings of the Qur'an do you prefer?' The Prophet answered, 'The 
reading of Abdallah ibn Mas'ud.' Then Abdallah came to him, and he learned

what was altered and abrogated." This is reasonably clear. The Hadith says

that ****tions of the Qur'an were conflicting, changed, and cancelled.

Tradition tells us that Muhammad had not foreseen his death, and so he had

made no preparations for gathering his revelations. He left it up to his 
followers to sift through the conflicting versions. That's astoni****ng. 
Islam's lone "prophet" left his Qur'an as va****, sound waves that had long

since faded.

Bragging one day, the imposter called his surahs a miracle: 
Bukhari:V6B61N504 "Muhammad said, 'Every Prophet was given miracles
because 
of which people believed. But what I have been given is Divine Inspiration

which Allah has revealed to me. So I hope that my followers will outnumber

the followers of the other Prophets.'" If the Qur'an was his only
"miracle," 
why would he leave it in such horrid condition? I believe the answer is 
clear. Muhammad knew his recitals had been nothing more than a figment of 
his less-than-admirable imagination, situational scriptures designed to 
satiate his cravings. Preserving these recitals would only serve to 
incriminate him, as this Hadith suggests. Muslim: C24B20N4609 "The
Messenger 
said: 'Do not take the Qur'an on a journey with you, for I am afraid lest
it 
would fall into the hands of the enemy.' Ayyub, one of the narrators in
the 
chain of transmitters, said: 'The enemy may seize it and may quarrel with 
you over it.'"

A number of Bukhari Hadith suggest that Muhammad's companions tried to 
remember what they could of what he had said, but there was a problem.
Like 
today, those who knew the Qur'an were militants. So Abu Bakr feared that 
large ****tions would be forgotten. The best Muslims were dying on the 
battlefield subduing fellow Arabs. In one battle alone, most of the
Qur'an's 
most knowledgeable reciters were lost, and many Qur'anic passages along
with 
them. Bukhari:V6B60N201 "Zaid bin Thabit, the Ansari said, 'Abu Bakr sent 
for me after the (heavy) casualties among the warriors (of the battle) of 
Yamama (where a great number of Muhammad's Companions were killed). Umar
was 
present with Bakr. "The people have suffered heavy casualties at Yamama,
and 
I am afraid that there will be more casualties among those who can recite 
the Qur'an on other battlefields. A large part of the Qur'an may be lost 
unless you collect it." I replied to Umar, "How can I do something which 
Allah's Apostle has not done?" Umar kept on pressing, trying to persuade
me 
to accept his proposal.' Zaid bin Thabit added, 'Umar was sitting with Abu

Bakr and was speaking (to) me. "You are a wise young man and we do not 
suspect you of telling lies or of forgetfulness. You used to write the 
Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle. Therefore, look for the Qur'an and

collect it (in one manuscript)." By Allah, if Abu Bakr had ordered me to 
****ft one of the mountains (from its place) it would have been easier for
me 
than the collection of the Qur'an. I said to both of them, "How dare you
do 
a thing which the Prophet has not done?"

Zaid declared that collecting the Qur'an's surahs would be an impossible 
task. He said that it would be easier to move mountains than to turn 
Muhammad's string of oral recitals into a book. The reason for this rather

troubling statement is obvious: Zaid's search for Qur'anic passages forced

him to rely upon carvings on the leg or thigh bones of dead animals, as
well 
as palm leaves, skins, mats, stones, and bark. But for the most part, he 
found nothing better than the fleeting memories of the prophet's
Companions, 
many of whom were dead or dying. In other words, the Qur'an, like the 
Hadith, is all hearsay.

There were no Muslims who had memorized the entire Qur'an, otherwise the 
collection would have been a simple task. Had there been individuals who 
knew the Qur'an, Zaid would only have had to write down what they
dictated. 
Instead, Zaid was overwhelmed by the assignment, and was forced to
"search" 
for the passages from men who believed that they had memorized certain 
segments and then compare what he heard to the recollection of others. 
Therefore, even the official Islamic view of things, the one recorded in 
their scripture, is hardly reassuring.

Worse still, the Muslim chosen for this impossible task was the one in the

best position to plagiarize the Torah and Talmud. Moreover, it's obvious
he 
did. Remember: Tabari VII:167 "In this year, the Prophet commanded Zayd
bin 
Thabit to study the Book of the Jews, saying, 'I fear that they may change

my Book.'"

As is typical of the Islamic Traditions, the more one digs, the worse it 
gets. Bukhari:V6B61N511 "Zaid bin Thabit said, 'I started searching for
the 
Qur'an till I found the last two Verses of Surat At-Tauba with Abi but I 
could not find them with anyone other than him. They were: 'Verily there
has 
come to you an Apostle from amongst yourselves.'" [Qur'an 9:128] This is 
incriminating. The 9th surah was the second to last revealed. If only one 
person could remember it, there is no chance those revealed twenty-five 
years earlier were retained. Furthermore, this Tradition contradicts the 
most highly touted Islamic mantra: Most Muslims contend Uthman, not Bakr, 
ordered the collection of the Qur'an a decade later.

And who knows what version they finally committed to paper, if in fact
they 
ever did? Bukhari:V6B61N513: "Allah's Apostle said, 'Gabriel [whom
Muhammad 
said had 600 wings] recited the Qur'an to me in one way. Then I requested 
him and continued asking him to recite it in other ways, and he recited it

in several ways till he ultimately recited it in seven different ways.'"
So 
there were at least seven Qur'ans.

That wasn't the end of the confusion. In version two of the angelic
recital, 
Muhammad was the reciter, not Gabriel. Bukhari:V6B61N519: "In the month of

Ramadan Gabriel used to meet Muhammad every night of the month till it 
elapsed. Allah's Apostle used to recite the Qur'an for him." Then, we go 
from every night to once a year. Bukhari:V6B61N520: "Gabriel used to
repeat 
the recitation of the Qur'an with the Prophet once a year, but he repeated

it twice with him in the year he died."

No wonder they couldn't remember who said what to whom. Bukhari:V6B61N549 
"Allah's Apostle said, "The example of the person who knows the Qur'an by 
heart is like the owner of tied camels. If he keeps them tied, he will 
control them, but if he releases them, they will run away." To release 
something you have memorized you would have to share it. So this Hadith is

apparently telling Muslims not to recite surahs for fear of losing them.
And 
speaking of losing it: Bukhari:V6B61N550 "The Prophet said, 'It is a bad 
thing that some of you say, "I have forgotten such-and-such verse of the 
Qur'an." For indeed, I have been caused to forget it. So you must keep on 
reciting the Qur'an because it escapes from the hearts of men faster than
a 
runaway camel.'"

This frivolity is im****tant because it exposes a lie that sits at the
heart 
of Islam. It's irrational to think God would ****ft from a reliance on 
literate Jewish prophets to an illiterate Arab. The foundation of Islamic 
teaching is based upon the notion that God chose Arabs because they had
good 
memories. Therefore, they reason, the Qur'an wouldn't be changed the way
the 
Bible was corrupted. All Islamic schools from Alazahr to Pakistan are 
centered around this obvious lie. The Qur'an was forgotten; it was changed

and recited by so many people it was corrupted beyond hope before it ever 
found paper. And since the Bible started out as words on a page, it has 
remained true to its initial inspiration.

But it's worse than that. Muslims insist on confining the Qur'an to 
Religious Arabic - a language which is so hard to learn with its complex 
grammar and antiquated vocabulary, it's ranked second by linguists after 
Chinese, as the world's least hospitable communication medium. Worse
still, 
even in Arabic much of the Qur'an cannot be understood because many words 
are missing and others are nonsensical. It's not rational to think that
God 
would choose illiterate people and such a difficult language if he wished
to 
communicate his message to the whole world. It's like using diesel to fuel
a 
lamp and then hiding it in a swamp.

But there is a method to their madness. By confining the Qur'an to
Religious 
Arabic, Islamic clerics and kings can say whatever they want - and they
do. 
An Egyptian doctor who edited Prophet of Doom wrote: "You would be amazed 
how they can distort facts to deceive others."

In keeping with the camel theme, Allah's divinely inspired messenger 
announced: Bukhari:V6B61N552 "The Prophet said, 'Keep on reciting the 
Qur'an, for Qur'an runs away (is forgotten) faster than camels that are 
released from their tying ropes.'" In the interest of full disclosure, I 
present: Bukhari:V6B61N559 "The Prophet said, 'Why does anyone of the
people 
say, "I have forgotten such-and-such Verses (of the Qur'an)?" I am, in
fact, 
caused (by Allah) to forget.'" It's a wonder anyone takes Islam seriously.

Continuing to cripple its own claim that the Qur'an was retained as
Allah's 
Pen wrote it: Bukhari:V6B61N561 "Umar bin Khattab [the second Caliph]
said, 
'I heard Hisham bin Hakim bin Hizam reciting Surat Al-Furqan ["Al-Furqan,"

the title of the 25th surah, has no meaning in any language.] during the 
lifetime of Allah's Apostle. I listened to his recitation and noticed that

he recited it in several ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. So
I 
was on the point of attacking him in the prayer, but I waited till he 
finished, and then I seized him by the collar. "Who taught you this Surah 
which I have heard you reciting?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it
to 
me." I said, "You are lying. Allah's Apostle taught me in a different way 
this very Surah which I have heard you reciting." So I led him to
Muhammad. 
"O Allah's Apostle! I heard this person reciting Surat-al-Furqan in a way 
that you did not teach me." The Prophet said, "Hisham, recite!" So he 
recited in the same way as I heard him recite it before. On that Allah's 
Apostle said, "It was revealed to be recited in this way." Then the
Prophet 
said, "Recite, Umar!" So I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle

said, "It was revealed to be recited in this way, too." He added, "The 
Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in several different ways, so
recite 
of it that which is easier for you." If Muhammad were alive today and made

this statement, he would be branded an apostate, hunted down and murdered.

As we shall soon discover, he just contradicted Islam's holy grail.

Examining these Hadith we discover that the first "manuscript" wasn't even

in Muhammad's tongue, requiring it to be translated. Bukhari:V4B56N709 
"Uthman called Zaid, Abdallah, Said, and Abd-Rahman. They wrote the 
manuscripts of the Qur'an in the form of a book in several copies. Uthman 
said to the three Qurai**** persons, 'If you differ with Zaid bin Thabit on

any point of the Qur'an, then write it in the language of the Quraysh, as 
the Qur'an was revealed in their language.' So they acted accordingly." 
Because there was such confusion, Uthman ordered competing versions to be 
burned. But by destroying the evidence, he destroyed the Qur'an's 
credibility. Now all Muslims have is wishful thinking.

Since "wishful thinking" isn't sufficient, and since the Islamic Hadith is

more conflicting than helpful, I am going to turn to reason and fact to 
determine what is true and what is not.

First, let's establish what Muslims believe so that we can direct our 
attention to determining whether or not it is accurate, or even
reasonable. 
As evidenced by the official Islamic introduction to the Qur'an, Islamic 
scholars contend: "The Qur'an is one leg of two which form the basis of 
Islam. The second leg is the Sunnah of the Prophet. What makes the Qur'an 
different from the Sunnah is its form. Unlike the Sunnah, the Qur'an is 
quite literally the Word of Allah, whereas the Sunnah was inspired by
Allah 
but the wording and actions are the Prophet's. The Qur'an has not been 
expressed using any human words. Its wording is letter for letter fixed by

Allah. Prophet Muhammad was the final Messenger of Allah to humanity, and 
therefore the Qur'an is the last Message which Allah has sent to us. Its 
predecessors, such as the Torah, Psalms, and Gospels have all been 
superceded." Funny thing, though, the Allah-inspired Sunnah just confirmed

that the Qur'an used "human words" and that it wasn't "fixed letter for 
letter by Allah." Muslims ought to read their own scriptures.

Despite all evidence to the contrary, including their own, Islamic
scholars 
contend that today's Qur'an is an identical copy of Allah's Eternal
Tablets, 
even so far as the punctuation, titles, and divisions of chapters are 
concerned. Maududi, one of the most esteemed Qur'anic scholars said, "The 
Qur'an exists in its original text, without a word, syllable nor even
letter 
having been changed." (Towards Understanding Islam, Maududi) Abu Dhabi, 
another leading Muslim said, "No other book in the world can match the 
Qur'an. The astoni****ng fact about this Book of Allah is that it has 
remained unchanged, even to a dot, over the last fourteen hundred years.
No 
variation of text can be found in it." That's factually untrue, every word

of it.

The Qur'an says of itself: "Nay this is a glorious Qur'an, (inscribed) on
a 
Preserved Tablet." (85:21) "A Scripture Book, whereof the verses are 
explained in detail; a Qur'an in Arabic." (Qur'an 41:3) "We have coined
for 
man in this Qur'an. (It is) a Qur'an in Arabic, without any crookedness 
(therein)." (39:27) Richard Nixon tried that line too. It didn't work any 
better for him than it does for Allah. Over the course of these pages
you'll 
discover why.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Islam provides only one prime source of information on Muhammad
"antraique" <  2007-03-14 08:05:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 23 21:13:20 CDT 2008.