On Feb 14, 8:45 pm, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Doug Reese" <dre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:1171411009.037113.308970@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 14, 5:28 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Doug Reese" <dre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>news:1171391353.267104.260170@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > On Feb 14, 12:55 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> >> "Doug Reese" <dre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >>news:1171379607.083066.239310@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > On Feb 13, 8:39 pm, "Crosslands" <npeter...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> What the Navy's chief investigator means is that the paperwork
for
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> medals was filled out correctly. He did not and can not know
if
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> actual
> >> >> >> details are true and accurate.
> >> >> > At least 3 people who were present -- Kerry and the two enlisted
> >> >> > guys
> >> >> > -- have said enough that a PH would be awarded.
> >> >> Anecdotal.
> >> > Give me a break. They were there.
> >> Anecdotal or cir***stantial (hearsay) evidence is dismissed when
PHYSICAL
> >> evidence is present. All we need the a PH Recommendations....
> > Sorry, but three guys present thought there were VC.
>
> Fine. I don't dispute what they have said.
>
> > The doctor testified that Kerry was wounded, and that he treated the
> > wound.
>
> Fine. Why bother disputing that?
>
> > All this BS 35 years later isn't going to change the fact that
> > all of that (the presence of the enemy, being wounded, and that
> > wound being treated by medical personel) is what is necessary for a
> > PH.
>
> Fine.
>
> > And what makes you think the award recommendations are part of Kerry's
> > personal files?
>
> Wild guess, perhaps?
>
> >> >> > Only one guy -- who may, or may not have been there -- has said
> >> >> > something to dispute what the other three have said. And he did
that
> >> >> > 35 years after the fact.
> >> >> Anecdotal.
> >> > Anecdotal? It is a fact.
> >> Its irrelevant.
> > What you're asking for is irrelevant . . . . . coming up on 38 years
> > after the fact.
>
> I agree. Kerry is irrelevant.
On the outside chance you think I was saying Kerry is irrelevant, I
wasn't. those were your words.
>Maybe, probably, he matters to the folks in
> MA. But he's finished in national politics.
>
> If he wants this matter left unresolved its his business.
It isn't "unresolved". Those who hate Kerry will be asking for various
kinds of paperwork from now till the end of time -- let them ask away.
The matter is resolved with those who matter -- the Navy. . . . . And
the overwhelming majority of guys who were with him for these various
incidents know the truth.
Doug Reese
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
