On May 13, 10:13 pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 13, 5:33 pm, as his stupidity increases, "cut-out-bin-king",
> milt.shook just keeps plodding along <LOL>:
> ...
>
>
>
> > On May 13, 12:37 pm, Clay <clays0nl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 13, 11:54 am, just one more example as to why worst-selling
> > > author milt.shook is the stupidest poster on USENET:
> > > ...
>
> > > > On May 13, 11:37 am, "My Favorite Chageling" <Kook>:
>
> > > > > Fox News: For Republicans Only
>
> > > > > The ratings for the cable news coverage last night reveal
somethin=
g at once
> > > > > interesting and expected:
>
> > > > > 25-54 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
>
> > > > > FNC ElectionHQ: Hume: Shep: Primary: Primary:
Primary: =
Primary:
> > > > > 228 261 316 483 507 679 465
>
> > > > > CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Elec.Cent.: Elec.Cent.:
Elec.Cent.=
:
> > > > > Elec.Cent.: Elec.Cent.:
> > > > > 294 366 479 720 785 910 712
>
> > > > > MSNBC Hardball: Spec.Cov.: Spec.Cov.: Spec.Cov.:
Spec.Co=
v.:
> > > > > Spec.Cov.: Spec.Cov.:
> > > > > 243 308 431 651 679 594 414
>
> > > > > Fox News came in third in five of the seven primetime and prime
ad=
jacent
> > > > > hours. They finished the evening in third place.
>
> > > > This is what i have always said.
>
> > <snip meaningless drivel>
>
> BULLSEYE !!!
>
> *snicker*
>
> > > > No one watches Fox for news.
>
> > > Oh... you're so stupid !!!
>
> > > One night, milt.shook... one night, and your stupid ass is popping
> > > champagne corks?
>
> > No, not one night at all.
>
> That is the only night the moron was posting about, stupid.
>
> True or false?
>
> > Whenever there's a breaking news story or an
> > election,
>
> Not breaking news, stupid... and not "an election" (God, but you're
> stupid)... repeat after me... "A Democratic Primary".
>
> *sigh*
>
> > CNN's and MSNBC's ratings go through the roof, and Fox's
> > either stay static or fall.
>
> Well... they don't fall, stupid... they also go up -- just not as much
> as CNN or MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen.
>
> > That's not coincidence...
>
> No... it isn't (and neither is your stupidity).
>
> > But hey; if you can find a pattern of exceptions to this... let's see
> > it.
>
> Lemme keep going. Lemme show you just how stupid you truly are.
>
>
>
> > > *sigh*
>
> > > > Wingnuts watch the talking heads to have their opinions validated
> > > > and that's all.
>
> > > So, stupidest poster on USENET, is it your contention that
> > > "news" (jeez, how stupid you truly are) only happens on weekdays...
> > > from 5am until midnight?
>
> > > Whatever your dumbass answer is... explain this:
>
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > Sunday May 11, 2008
>
> > > 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
> > > FNC ElectionHQ: FNSunday: Re****t: Geraldo: Hannity: Strategy:
> > > Re****t:
> > > 179 263 222 238 219 217 249
>
> > > CNN News/Bowl: Newsroom: Dobbs: Spec.Invest.: King: Newsroom:
> > > Spec.Invest.:
> > > 106 132 140 220 213 279 229
>
> > > MSNBC Investig.: MTP: Investig.: Investig.: Investig.:
> > > Investig.: Investig.:
> > > 181 174 134 129 157 176 123
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> > > The above should give you liberal nightmares, milt.shook.
>
> > What was the breaking major news story Sunday, idiot?
>
> God, you're so stupid...
>
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Tornado, storm cleanups prove costly for Entergy
>
> Associated Press - May 11, 2008 2:54 PM ET
>
> STUTTGART, Ark. (AP) - More than 170 utility workers from Entergy
> Arkansas are in Stuttgart today, repairing power lines destroyed in
> Saturday's tornado.
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Governor Beebe to inspect storm damage in Stuttgart
>
> Associated Press - May 11, 2008 9:14 AM ET
>
> STUTTGART, Ark. (AP) - Governor Beebe is to view storm damage in
> Stuttgart this morning. Beebe is to arrive in the east Arkansas city
> at 10 a.m. and about an hour later will discuss with media what he
> saw.
>
> The tornado hit the south side of the city Saturday evening, injuring
> nine people. The storm system killed more than 20 people in Georgia,
> Missouri and Oklahoma.
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Death toll jumps 5,000
>
> Associated Press - May 12, 2008 1:14 PM ET
>
> YANGON, Myanmar (AP) =97 Myanmar's state television says the death toll
> in last week's cyclone has jumped by about 5,000 to 28,458. It said
> Sunday that the number of missing now stands at 33,416.
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> "Breaking News", stupid. Both national and international. And there
> was more... but why bother?
>
> God, you're so stupid.
Um, the first stories hit the news on -- are you ready? MAY 5!!
yeah, SIX DAYS before your "breaking news" claim.
>
> > Was there a
> > primary election we didn't know about on Sunday?
>
> For some reason, you seem to think that Democratic Primaries is the
> only "news" there is.
>
> Oh... not "for some reason"... it's b/c you're stupid.
Um, no. But the original poster was pointing out the ratings from the
breaking election news. You know; the primary elections that could
make or break the careers of two politicians?
>
> > You don't even understand the point we're trying to make.
>
> Yeah, stupid... I do. You're the one with "brain-lock".
>
> News did break over the weekend... to think that "news" did not break
> (or never breaks) shows just how stupid you are, milt.shook.
TUESDAY. The original post was about Tuesday DURING breaking news.
>
> News did break over the weekend... I just proved it did.
No, you proved that you can cut and paste ratings from nearly a week
after the cyclone hit.
>
> CNN covered it (as per usual). FOXNews covered (as per usual).
> MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen? Nah... they were too busy running
> "life behind prison" infotainment for the 20th time.
Right. But Fox beat 'em, dammit.
By the way, you clown, doesn't the fact that MSNBC was running those
****y documentaries kinda hint to you that there WAS no breaking news
at that time? I mean, unless you call Alec Baldwin saying he might run
for office in a 60 minutes interview "breaking news.".. oh, wait...
you do...
>
> Stupid !!!
>
> > We're talking about NEWS. Like you point out in your rant, which
> > actually agreed with us, MSNBC runs "investigative re****ts" that
> > everyone's seen a million times, and CNN had reruns.
>
> Stupid... CNN wasn't running only reruns... they were broadcasting
> news stories about the DemPrimary and other NEWS.
You know, i think I figured out why journalism is so bad these days.
No one knows what news is.
Reha****ng the day's activities on the stump is not news. Vote tallies
is news.
> And... if you think
> programs about life in Utah or California prisons are "investigative
> re****ts" (for the 20th time)... then there is only one word for that:
>
> Stupid.
No argument from me on that.
>
> > I would note, however, that in the above, A rerun of Larry King beat a
> > new episode of Hannity's (Heaping helping of) America.
>
> But what network won the night, stupid?
You still don't get the original point, do you?
When something is happening -- when there is BREAKING NEWS happening,
most people turn to CNN and MSNBC, NOT FOX! Yes, Fox has more viewers
than the other cable news networks most of the time, but that's
because there isn't much news on those news channels most of the time.
When there is a BREAKING NEWS story, people go to Fox LAST.
I'm not arguing that they are usually third. They're only third when
something im****tant happens, and people want to find out the details.
CNN's ratings quadruple, MSNBC's triple, and Fox's actually drop a
little.
>
> > No nightmares here... Just laughing at your sorry ass.
>
> Yes, stupid... facts and reality whiz right over that pinhead of
> yours. And since you can't comprehend, you laugh like a... stupid
> person.
Yeah. Okay.
|
