On May 13, 9:37 am, Clay <clays0nl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 13, 11:54 am, just one more example as to why worst-selling
> author milt.shook is the stupidest poster on USENET:
> ...
>
>
>
> > On May 13, 11:37 am, "My Favorite Chageling" <Kook>:
>
> > > Fox News: For Republicans Only
>
> > > The ratings for the cable news coverage last night reveal something
at once
> > > interesting and expected:
>
> > > 25-54 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
>
> > > FNC ElectionHQ: Hume: Shep: Primary: Primary: Primary:
Primary:
> > > 228 261 316 483 507 679 465
>
> > > CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Elec.Cent.: Elec.Cent.: Elec.Cent.:
> > > Elec.Cent.: Elec.Cent.:
> > > 294 366 479 720 785 910 712
>
> > > MSNBC Hardball: Spec.Cov.: Spec.Cov.: Spec.Cov.:
Spec.Cov.:
> > > Spec.Cov.: Spec.Cov.:
> > > 243 308 431 651 679 594 414
>
> > > Fox News came in third in five of the seven primetime and prime
adjacent
> > > hours. They finished the evening in third place.
>
> > This is what i have always said.
>
> "~~ This is what i have always said~~".
>
> "~~ This is what i have always said~~".
>
> "~~ This is what i have always said~~".
>
> You're the stupidest poster on USENET, milt.shook.
>
> I always said THAT.
>
> <LOL>
>
> To piggy-back off of a moron's post speaks volumes about your stupid
> ass.
>
> > No one watches Fox for news.
>
> Oh... you're so stupid !!!
>
> One night, milt.shook... one night, and your stupid ass is popping
> champagne corks?
>
> *sigh*
>
> > Wingnuts watch the talking heads to have their opinions validated
> > and that's all.
>
> So, stupidest poster on USENET, is it your contention that
> "news" (jeez, how stupid you truly are) only happens on weekdays...
> from 5am until midnight?
>
> Whatever your dumbass answer is... explain this:
>
> ====================
> Sunday May 11, 2008
>
> 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
> FNC ElectionHQ: FNSunday: Re****t: Geraldo: Hannity: Strategy:
> Re****t:
> 179 263 222 238 219 217 249
>
> CNN News/Bowl: Newsroom: Dobbs: Spec.Invest.: King: Newsroom:
> Spec.Invest.:
> 106 132 140 220 213 279 229
>
> MSNBC Investig.: MTP: Investig.: Investig.: Investig.:
> Investig.: Investig.:
> 181 174 134 129 157 176 123
> ====================
>
> The above should give you liberal nightmares, milt.shook.
> MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen doesn't even broadcast "news"
> during the weekend. Save "Meet The Press" (did you see the heads-up
> with "FNS", ****-for-brains?), MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen runs
> "life behind bars" marathons & "Dateline" infotainment shows from the
> 90's.
>
> There is another cable network that does the same thing, dimwit...
> "TRUtv" (formerly "COURTtv").
>
> *sigh*
>
> > Whenever there's a news story, CNN and MSNBC kick Fox's ass,
> > because sometimes people need at least some journalistic integrity,
> > and Fox has zero.
>
> I've explained to your stupid ass in another thread that what you're
> talking about is... "The Democratic Primary" coverage... NOT news.
>
> Now, granted... FOXNews did have Barack Obama on the Sunday show and
> Hillary Clinton on "The O'Reilly Factor" (uhhh, stupid... no mention
> of those ratings, huh? Was that interview NOT "news"?)... so one
> would think that FOXNews would do better than that. But it looks like
> they are not gonna do well covering the Democratic Primary.
>
> But... they'll kick ass for the rest of the year... thank you:
>
> ====================
> Tuesday Apr 01, 2008
> Q1 2008 Ratings: FNC Makes it 25 In A Row
> In the first quarter, Fox News Channel was the most-watched channel in
> all of cable news, winning both the today day and prime time
> categories in Total Viewers. This marks the 25th consecutive quarter
> in which FNC has won these categories.
>
> Fox & Friends (7-9amET) and America's Newsroom (9-11amET) saw double-
> digit gains in viewer****p compared to Q1 2007; up 25% and 23%
> respectively.
>
> During prime time (Mon-Sun, 8p-11p), FNC was up 13% from the first
> quarter 2007. In total day, FNC was up 11%.
> ====================
>
> Make sure you E-mail gnat & zepp... for some back-up, stupidest poster
> on USENET.
>
> Too ****ing funny.
>
> -C-
What is disturbing is that people would rely upon a network like
Foxnews for their news when it can be easily proven that Fox is
biased. Why would anyone want their news biased? Only a coward would
seek out information that they are comfortable with.
|
