On May 14, 4:05=A0pm, milt.shook made my head hurt b4:
...
> On May 14, 3:44 pm, Eat the rich <goofin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> > On May 13, 9:37 am, Clay <clays0nl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 13, 11:54 am, just one more example as to why worst-selling
> > > author milt.shook is the stupidest poster on USENET:
> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0...
>
> > > > On May 13, 11:37 am, "My Favorite Chageling" <Kook>:
>
> > > > > Fox News: For Republicans Only
>
> > > > > The ratings for the cable news coverage last night reveal
somethin=
g at once
> > > > > interesting and expected:
>
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 25-54 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
>
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 FNC ElectionHQ: =A0Hume: =A0Shep: =A0Primary:
=A0Prima=
ry: =A0Primary: =A0Primary:
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 228 =A0261 =A0316 =A0483 =A0507 =A0679 =A0465
>
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 CNN Blitzer: =A0Blitzer: =A0Elec.Cent.:
=A0Elec.Cent.:=
=A0Elec.Cent.:
> > > > > Elec.Cent.: =A0Elec.Cent.:
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 294 =A0366 =A0479 =A0720 =A0785 =A0910 =A0712
>
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 MSNBC Hardball: =A0Spec.Cov.: =A0Spec.Cov.:
=A0Spec.Co=
v.: =A0Spec.Cov.:
> > > > > Spec.Cov.: =A0Spec.Cov.:
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 243 =A0308 =A0431 =A0651 =A0679 =A0594 =A0414
>
> > > > > Fox News came in third in five of the seven primetime and prime
ad=
jacent
> > > > > hours. They finished the evening in third place.
>
> > > > This is what i have always said.
>
> > > "~~ This is what i have always said~~".
>
> > > "~~ This is what i have always said~~".
>
> > > "~~ This is what i have always said~~".
>
> > > You're the stupidest poster on USENET, milt.shook.
>
> > > I always said THAT.
>
> > > <LOL>
>
> > > To piggy-back off of a moron's post speaks volumes about your stupid
> > > ass.
>
> > > > No one watches Fox for news.
>
> > > Oh... you're so stupid !!!
>
> > > One night, milt.shook... one night, and your stupid ass is popping
> > > champagne corks?
>
> > > *sigh*
>
> > > > Wingnuts watch the talking heads to have their opinions validated
> > > > and that's all.
>
> > > So, stupidest poster on USENET, is it your contention that
> > > "news" (jeez, how stupid you truly are) only happens on weekdays...
> > > from 5am until midnight?
>
> > > Whatever your dumbass answer is... explain this:
>
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > Sunday May 11, 2008
>
> > > 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:
> > > FNC ElectionHQ: =A0FNSunday: =A0Re****t: =A0Geraldo: =A0Hannity:
=A0Str=
ategy:
> > > Re****t:
> > > =A0 179 =A0263 =A0222 =A0238 =A0219 =A0217 =A0249
>
> > > CNN News/Bowl: =A0Newsroom: =A0Dobbs: =A0Spec.Invest.: =A0King:
=A0New=
sroom:
> > > Spec.Invest.:
> > > =A0 106 =A0132 =A0140 =A0220 =A0213 =A0279 =A0229
>
> > > MSNBC Investig.: =A0MTP: =A0Investig.: =A0Investig.: =A0Investig.:
> > > Investig.: =A0Investig.:
> > > =A0 181 =A0174 =A0134 =A0129 =A0157 =A0176 =A0123
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> > > The above should give you liberal nightmares, milt.shook.
> > > MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen doesn't even broadcast "news"
> > > during the weekend. =A0Save "Meet The Press" (did you see the
heads-up=
> > > with "FNS", ****-for-brains?), MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen
runs=
> > > "life behind bars" marathons & "Dateline" infotainment shows from
the
> > > 90's.
>
> > > There is another cable network that does the same thing, dimwit...
> > > "TRUtv" (formerly "COURTtv").
>
> > > *sigh*
>
> > > > Whenever there's a news story, CNN and MSNBC kick Fox's ass,
> > > > because sometimes people need at least some journalistic
integrity,
> > > > and Fox has zero.
>
> > > I've explained to your stupid ass in another thread that what you're
> > > talking about is... "The Democratic Primary" coverage... NOT news.
>
> > > Now, granted... FOXNews did have Barack Obama on the Sunday show and
> > > Hillary Clinton on "The O'Reilly Factor" (uhhh, stupid... no mention
> > > of those ratings, huh? =A0Was that interview NOT "news"?)... so one
> > > would think that FOXNews would do better than that. =A0But it looks
li=
ke
> > > they are not gonna do well covering the Democratic Primary.
>
> > > But... they'll kick ass for the rest of the year... thank you:
>
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > Tuesday Apr 01, 2008
> > > Q1 2008 Ratings: FNC Makes it 25 In A Row
> > > In the first quarter, Fox News Channel was the most-watched channel
in=
> > > all of cable news, winning both the today day and prime time
> > > categories in Total Viewers. This marks the 25th consecutive quarter
> > > in which FNC has won these categories.
>
> > > Fox & Friends (7-9amET) and America's Newsroom (9-11amET) saw
double-
> > > digit gains in viewer****p compared to Q1 2007; up 25% and 23%
> > > respectively.
>
> > > During prime time (Mon-Sun, 8p-11p), FNC was up 13% from the first
> > > quarter 2007. In total day, FNC was up 11%.
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> > > Make sure you E-mail gnat & zepp... for some back-up, stupidest
poster=
> > > on USENET.
>
> > > Too ****ing funny.
>
> > > -C-
>
> > What is disturbing is that people would rely upon a network like
> > Foxnews for their news when it can be easily proven that Fox is
> > biased. =A0Why would anyone want their news biased? =A0Only a coward
wou=
ld
> > seek out information that they are comfortable with.
>
> You know, I could almost live with some bias. In fact, I think this
> whole concept of "objective journalism," whereby the press thinks that
> showing both sides of an issue constitutes "objective," is for the
> birds. How about just telling what happened. Sometimes, the truth is
> biased, and that's okay.
So... you're NOT for "The Fairness Doctrine"... right?
> What bothers me about Fox is the outright lies. They are a propaganda
> arm of the far right, and their sole aim is to bull**** the electorate
> into voting a certain way.
And... you are saying that no other network "lies"... right?
Oh... yeah... just to make it interesting... you say "... [Fox]
outright lies".
Care to cite?
Oh... fair warning... be prepared to also prove that when "Fox
lied"... they didn't come back to retract or clarify "the lie".
I think that's fair.
> Put it this way; Thom Hartmann is biased as hell. BUT everything he
> says is true and verifiable. OTOH, almost nothing Rush Limbaugh says
> is true and verifiable. It's not Limbaugh's bias I object to. There's
> a conservative (not a right winger; a conservative) on the radio in
> Baltimore named Ron Smith; he comes from the right, and his point of
> view infuriates me at times, but you know what? He's honest. He and I
> don't see eye to eye on much, but I can't say that what he says is a
> lie...
That was an interesting paragraph, milt.shook... very well written.
Please... make sure you save it... it probably deserves to go into
your next (non) best-seller.
*snicker*
Now tell me this, milt.shook... what in the hell does the above have
to do with FOXNews?
> Bias isn't the problem. It's the lies.
Hmmm... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you simply
"didn't finish your thought".
As they say in "TV-land"... "now... back to FOXNews".
I'll be waiting.
-C-
|
