Ron Allen wrote:
> Michael Price wrote:
> > As usaul of course you [i.e., Ron Allen] claim
> > that others are ignorant of the literature
> > without posting anything of the literature or
> > even where it says what you think backs your
> > case. In fact you know very little of the
> > literature of anything, even socialism.
>
> Ron Allen wrote:
> > That you are not intellectually curious is why
> > you do not read very much, . . .
>
> Michael Price wrote:
> > I would guess I read more than you. The fact
> > that I don't scour the literature for things
> > that sup****t your fallacies is not evidence that
> > I am ill-read. It is not my job to provide you
> > with evidence of your beliefs which you are too
> > ignorant to have read yourself.
>
>
> Ron Allen wrote:
> > You cannot know, and you do not know how much I
> > read.
>
>
> Michael Price wrote:
> > I know that you haven't read enough to refute
> > any of my points which is why you tell me to
> > read instead.
>
> Ron Allen answers:
> I have nothing more to add to this.
>
And yet you do.
>
> Ron Allen wrote:
> > If you guess that you read more than me, then
> > your evidence for what you assert is just as
> > unwarranted and illusory as is the alleged
> > evidence that you believe you set forth for all
> > your array of assertions.
>
>
> Michael Price wrote:
> > Well I have read things that sup****t my beliefs
> > with valid, logical reasoning, you have not, as
> > witnessed by your refusal to cite them when
> > pressed.
>
>
> Ron Allen answers:
> I write what I will. I know that it is useless to
> argue with you.
No it's only useless to argue with me badly. You can't seem
to argue well at all so you conclude it is useless to argue with me.
> I write not to convince you, but
> to correct your erroneous readings of what I
> write, and to address your controversial
> criticisms and interpretations of ideas such as
> socialism, democracy, anarchism, etc.
>
No you don't. If you did you would actually correct some
of the things I say and provide evidence.
>
>
> Ron Allen wrote:
> > . . . and why so much of what I write is just so
> > foreign to your own narrow opinions about
> > social, moral, and political philosophy.
>
> Michael Price wrote:
> > No it's obvious fallacies that I point out
> > repeated is why it is so foreign to me. If what
> > you said was true how did I become an anarcho-
> > capitalist?
>
>
> Ron Allen wrote:
> > I assume, from what you write, that your
> > anarcho-capitalism is a creation of your
> > intellectual shallowness, a product of your
> > theoretical and observational ignorance.
>
> Michael Price wrote:
> > You assume it because it suits your purposes but
> > the assumption flies in the face of reason. Do
> > you think I was always an anarcho-capitalist? I
> > wasn't. So how did I become one if I am unable
> > to understand things foreign to my social, moral
> > and political philosophy?
>
> Ron Allen answers:
> An imbecile can believe that he or she is an
> anarcho-capitalist.
>
And an imbecile can miss the ****ing point. I changed
mysocial moral and political philosopher thereby proving
that I am able to understand things foreign to any philosophy
I hold at the time. The problem you have isn't my lack of
understanding it's your own.
>
> <><><><><><>
>
> "Socialism is the abolition of rational economy."
> -- Ludwig Edler von Mises
|
