On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:30:18 -0500, Bill Rood <wjrood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>
>Zeno wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:37:14 -0500, "Atticus" <taxxcpa@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Our greatest threat is our open borders and lack of enforcement.
Terrorists
>>>do not theaten us in the Middle East unless we send military personnel
over
>>>there for them to kill--but they are a threat if we fail to secure our
>>>borders and stop allowing foreigners unlimited access to our country.
>>
>>
>> I disagree. "Our greatest threat" are terrorist states.
>
>I agree. I am an American patriot and I want to see the people of the US
> prosper, which is why I am an implacable non-violent foe of the
>Federal Government and the Republocrats who control it.
>
>In 1985, the CIA organized and funded a car-bomb campaign in Lebanon
>that killed 280 civilians and wounded 1,150. This was intended to
>terrorize the Lebanese Resistance into compliance with Israeli demands
>made in 1984. When the resistance still refused, Sayyed Mohammad Hussein
>Fadlallah was targeted, as Israel had told the Reagan administration
>that he was the main leader of Hezbollah, though none of this was true.
>A huge car bomb outside Fadlallah's home failed to kill him, but did
>manage to snuff 83 civilians, mainly women and children.
>
>This is just one example of the terror perpetrated by the CIA. But the
>secret dealings of the CIA in Lebanon, Latin America and Africa are
>small potatoes compared with the devastation rained on millions of
>innocent civilians by official and public activities of the US Military
>and State Department. It's true, the US Federal Government is number one
>purveyor of state-sponsored terrorism in the world.
>
>>
>> Islamic terrorists will *never rest* until islamo-fascist prevails
>> over the world.
>
>You are projecting your own thoughts and desires, or at least those of
>your government and leaders. It is the US government, not Muslims, that
>is attempting to gain and maintain world-wide hegemony. The Pentagon
>calls it "full spectrum dominance". Muslims are fighting to expel our
>invaders from their lands.
Right. That is exactly what bin Laden said 10 years ago - expel the
U.S from muslim lands.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1998.html
Just think, U.S. forces would have withdrawn from Iraq years ago if
muslims hadn't started killing each other over this issue - let the
U.S. stay I want to be free, versus, get rid of the U.S. and let
islamo-fascism (muslim hegemony) rule Iraq.
You confuse islamic "hegemony" (which not only exists, it is overtly
dominant, e.g. as in your term "muslim lands") as being american
"hegemony". What you view as american hegemony is only a desire for
the U.S. to fairly purchase oil from the middle east area.
Simply, your understanding of the entire situation is lopsided, and
probably so because of spin (half-truth lies) by others.
>It is primarily we who are over there, not
>they who are over here. 9-11 was an unjustified abomination, but it was
>also an aberration and an inevitable result of our own depradations on
>the rest of the world.
>
>> They have sworn to Allah to do nothing in life but
>> make Islamic war.
>>
>> The word you use "terrorists" doesn't necessarily speak to "terrorist
>> states". That is, terrorist states have a government that creates
>> terrorist weapons - e.g. Iran's Hezbollah.
>>
>>
>>
|
