Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Libertarian > Re: U.S. polar ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 55 of 98 Topic 17728 of 20667
Post > Topic >>

Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North

by Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 05:51 PM

On May 15, 4:42 pm, "sdgreen" <sd.gr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Tunderbar" <tdcom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:e5eccd68-3027-4fa8-b393-58c8a04f0cc1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 15, 4:26 pm, "Chom Noamsky" <b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Tunderbar" <tdcom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:4d3ae1d5-53dc-45cf-97f2-a6356057b4e3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On May 15, 2:54 pm, "Chom Noamsky" <b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > "Eric Gisin" <gi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >news:B5adnXdTN9muHrHVnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > [Another example of AGW politics at odds with science.
> > > > Canada does not consider polar bears threatened, however they are
a
> > > > threat
> > > > to people.
> > > > Populations are not in decline, and they survived past ice-free
> > > > periods
> > > > just fine]
>
> > > How are polar bears threatening people? I can't recall the last time
> > > someone was attacked and/or eaten by a polar bear. Has that ever
> > > happened?
> > > As for the Americans, **** them, they can declare anything they
want...
> > > has
> > > nothing to do with Canadians except there will be a bit less trash
> > > wandering
> > > around up north.
>
> > You've just shown how pathetically ignorant you are on the topic of
> > polar bears. Feel free to go to Churchill, Manitoba, and approach any
> > polar bear you like and see what happens. Especially in the spring or
> > fall when they tend to migrate thru town. ****ing moron.
>
> > Of 14 polar bear populations in Canada, 12 are thriving and the other
> > two are getting by just fine. The population is 500% greater today
> > than in the 1970's, you know, when they were predicting catastrophic
> > global cooling due to manmade pollution.
>
> > Isn't it the way it is. American activists wanting to interfere in and
> > area where they have little or no real knowledge. Acting aggressively
> > on nothing more than misconceptions and guesswork.
>
> > --------------------
>
> > So I'll ask again.. how many people have been attacked and killed by
polar
> > bears? It's exceptionally rare to the point the only story of a polar
bear
> > attack on the internet is based on bogus facts. Sure, they are
potentially
> > dangerous carnivores, I just find the OP's comment that they are "a
threat
> > to people" simply assinine. It's the same sort of logic behind the
> > irrational fear of sharks, when maybe four people are killed by them
every
> > year. Four people out of six point five billion isn't much of a
threat.
> > Zero humans killed by polar bears out of the 6.5 billion on this
planet is
> > one of the silliest "threats" to humanity I've ever heard of.- Hide
quoted
> > text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Go to Churchill and go pet one and see what happens. There are few
> attacks because the human population is small and they all know to
> stay the hell away from the bears or to carry a gun.
> ============
> So very true. Obviously some folks have not experienced the wilderness.

I'd like to see them even pet a baby seal and see what happens.
 




 98 Posts in Topic:
U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Eric Gisin" &l  2008-05-15 11:36:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 19:54:25 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Sanity" <ne  2008-05-15 20:11:27 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"hanson" <ha  2008-05-15 21:42:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 07:00:27 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-15 16:12:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 21:13:56 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-15 17:26:43 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 07:11:30 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-16 09:15:33 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-05-16 23:55:01 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-18 23:34:40 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 13:54:19 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 21:26:32 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Sanity" <ne  2008-05-15 21:57:19 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 22:56:23 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Sanity" <ne  2008-05-15 23:20:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 05:38:18 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 10:13:15 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 15:10:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 11:21:32 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 15:31:47 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 11:34:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 16:53:46 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 14:39:00 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 19:04:14 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 15:07:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:46:32 
<<<>>> Re
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-17 10:15:36 
Re: <<<>>
DownThe <RabbitHole@[E  2008-05-17 10:40:24 
Re: <<<>>
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 11:54:10 
Re: <<<>>
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-17 16:15:23 
Re: <<<>>
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 15:20:08 
Re: <<<>>
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22=28E=3D  2008-05-17 12:31:33 
Re: <<<>>
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:18:13 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:41:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 14:01:00 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-15 17:25:13 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:34:57 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Jon Rock <johnrock@[EM  2008-05-16 07:05:45 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-16 09:12:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:33:06 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-15 23:16:46 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 14:23:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:36:46 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"The Ghost of Govern  2008-05-16 04:05:00 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Jack <agamemnon48a@[EM  2008-05-15 14:29:05 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 14:29:53 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"sdgreen" <s  2008-05-15 21:42:15 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:38:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Hop  2008-05-15 18:28:41 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:21:18 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Harry <random_chaotic@  2008-05-15 15:37:35 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Harry <random_chaotic@  2008-05-15 15:56:48 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 17:51:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"The Ghost of Govern  2008-05-16 03:47:41 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:42:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
herault <andrewranger0  2008-05-16 04:31:19 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-16 07:15:12 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 16:37:51 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-16 07:29:58 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Bill Ward <bward@[EMAI  2008-05-16 10:03:51 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 14:35:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:41:10 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:47:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
sparky <sparky12x@[EMA  2008-05-16 08:51:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:42:58 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:22:06 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Jack <agamemnon48a@[EM  2008-05-16 08:59:01 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 12:04:17 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:52:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 10:32:15 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:17:17 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Carl Walker <caseyterr  2008-05-16 11:11:20 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-16 13:34:42 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 23:20:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Herb <herbtunderbar@[E  2008-05-16 19:37:45 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:45:45 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:44:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:44:38 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 20:28:07 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 20:31:28 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-17 07:00:32 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-17 09:40:12 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-17 09:44:56 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 09:56:06 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 10:02:14 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:49:24 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-05-17 21:13:56 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:50:50 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:16:55 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 12:34:28 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:17:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-18 23:32:01 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Steve Thomas <misledrk  2008-05-19 18:25:50 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Steve Thomas <misledrk  2008-05-19 18:28:12 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 23:34:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Steve Thomas <misledrk  2008-05-19 22:13:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 8:33:54 CST 2008.