Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Libertarian > Re: U.S. polar ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 58 of 98 Topic 17728 of 19976
Post > Topic >>

Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North

by herault <andrewranger01@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 16, 2008 at 04:31 AM

On May 15, 5:25 pm, James Beck <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <72d5f1b9-feae-4d6d-afd9-ed29eff02034
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tdcom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
> > On May 15, 3:12 pm, James Beck <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article <Rx0Xj.2919$KB3.2867@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
> > > > "Eric Gisin" <gi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > >news:B5adnXdTN9muHrHVnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [Another example of AGW politics at odds with science.
> > > > > Canada does not consider polar bears threatened, however they
are a threat
> > > > > to people.
> > > > > Populations are not in decline, and they survived past ice-free
periods
> > > > > just fine]
>
> > > > How are polar bears threatening people?  I can't recall the last
time
> > > > someone was attacked and/or eaten by a polar bear.  Has that ever
happened?
> > > > As for the Americans, **** them, they can declare anything they
want... has
> > > > nothing to do with Canadians except there will be a bit less trash
wandering
> > > > around up north.
>
> > > *Caution* Graphic pics of polar bear
attack.http://www.hondahookup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=117389
>
> > > Less Americans spending 35K to shoot a bleach blonde bear means less
> > > money for the socialist paradise of CanaDUH.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > We spend our tax dollars on health care and education, you guys spend
> > it on beating the **** out of a country that had nothing to do with
> > 9-11. Retards. How many billions is it now, that you've wasted in
> > Iraq? Or is it trillions? How many dead and wounded soldiers? Do you
> > feel safer? With your wide open Mexican border, and wide open ****pping
> > terminals, and your guns being sold for pennies in every corner store,
> > and the desperation of people losing their housing and their life
> > savings to the banks mortgage depts.
>
> > Our "socialist paradise" economy is growing. How's you capitalist
> > economy doing, huh?
>
> I don't know where you get YOUR news, but my business has had several
> years of consecutive sales records and no end in sight.  I don't need
> the government telling me what kind of health care program I need, I pay
> for my own.

Stupid slob.  I don't know where you get YOUR news but I won the
lottery so I don't need to work, and since I won the lottery and don't
need to work, that must mean that everyone else won the lottery too
and doesn't need to work.
Why do you need a health plan when you won the lottery and have
millions?   You're just shoveling money into the great void called Big
Insurance.  Real capitalists don't need insurance because they pay
cash.
 




 98 Posts in Topic:
U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Eric Gisin" &l  2008-05-15 11:36:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 19:54:25 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Sanity" <ne  2008-05-15 20:11:27 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"hanson" <ha  2008-05-15 21:42:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 07:00:27 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-15 16:12:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 21:13:56 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-15 17:26:43 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 07:11:30 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-16 09:15:33 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-05-16 23:55:01 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-18 23:34:40 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 13:54:19 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 21:26:32 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Sanity" <ne  2008-05-15 21:57:19 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-15 22:56:23 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Sanity" <ne  2008-05-15 23:20:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 05:38:18 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 10:13:15 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 15:10:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 11:21:32 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 15:31:47 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 11:34:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 16:53:46 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 14:39:00 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 19:04:14 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 15:07:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:46:32 
<<<>>> Re
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-17 10:15:36 
Re: <<<>>
DownThe <RabbitHole@[E  2008-05-17 10:40:24 
Re: <<<>>
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 11:54:10 
Re: <<<>>
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-17 16:15:23 
Re: <<<>>
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 15:20:08 
Re: <<<>>
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22=28E=3D  2008-05-17 12:31:33 
Re: <<<>>
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:18:13 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:41:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 14:01:00 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-15 17:25:13 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:34:57 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Jon Rock <johnrock@[EM  2008-05-16 07:05:45 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
James Beck <jim@[EMAIL  2008-05-16 09:12:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:33:06 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-15 23:16:46 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 14:23:22 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:36:46 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"The Ghost of Govern  2008-05-16 04:05:00 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Jack <agamemnon48a@[EM  2008-05-15 14:29:05 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 14:29:53 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"sdgreen" <s  2008-05-15 21:42:15 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-15 21:38:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Hop  2008-05-15 18:28:41 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:21:18 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Harry <random_chaotic@  2008-05-15 15:37:35 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Harry <random_chaotic@  2008-05-15 15:56:48 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-15 17:51:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"The Ghost of Govern  2008-05-16 03:47:41 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:42:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
herault <andrewranger0  2008-05-16 04:31:19 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-16 07:15:12 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 16:37:51 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-16 07:29:58 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Bill Ward <bward@[EMAI  2008-05-16 10:03:51 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 14:35:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:41:10 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:47:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
sparky <sparky12x@[EMA  2008-05-16 08:51:49 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:42:58 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:22:06 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Jack <agamemnon48a@[EM  2008-05-16 08:59:01 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-16 12:04:17 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:52:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 10:32:15 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:17:17 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Carl Walker <caseyterr  2008-05-16 11:11:20 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Tunderbar <tdcomeau@[E  2008-05-16 13:34:42 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"Chom Noamsky"   2008-05-16 23:20:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Herb <herbtunderbar@[E  2008-05-16 19:37:45 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:45:45 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-16 18:44:59 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:44:38 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 20:28:07 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 20:31:28 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-17 07:00:32 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-17 09:40:12 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Poetic Justice <@[EMAI  2008-05-17 09:44:56 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 09:56:06 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 10:02:14 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:49:24 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Whata Fool <whata@[EMA  2008-05-17 21:13:56 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:50:50 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:16:55 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Cato <catoni52@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 12:34:28 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 18:17:04 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-18 23:32:01 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Steve Thomas <misledrk  2008-05-19 18:25:50 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Steve Thomas <misledrk  2008-05-19 18:28:12 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
"V-for-Vendicar"  2008-05-19 23:34:34 
Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North
Steve Thomas <misledrk  2008-05-19 22:13:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 14:45:51 CDT 2008.