Re: U.S. polar bear decision condemned in North

"Poetic Justice" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:qwkXj.46722$3v1.12764@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chom Noamsky wrote:
>> "Poetic Justice" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message 
>> news:7PhXj.5681$255.681@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Chom Noamsky wrote:
>>>> "Poetic Justice" <@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>>> message:
>>>>
>>>>> And that proves my Bar-B-Q made your beetles reproduce?
>>>> It's the best explanation so far, one that thousands of scientists 
>>>> around the globe sup****t.  Until the skeptics and deniers come up
with 
>>>> a better one I'll have to go with it.
>>> That's what was said about the Static Universe.
>>
>> Theories about the universe have little relevance to terrestial
pollution 
>> issues.
>
> I can see where the science is unrelated, odd that you would agree that 
> they try to use science on the universe and settle for Consensus on
Global 
> Warming.

Scientific method is applied to both areas of study, and no, global
warming 
is not consensus science.  Explaining and pondering the origins of the 
universe makes no difference to the average human, but the impact of 
pollution here on earth certainly does.