On Wed, 14 May 2008 11:15:39 -0500, Zeno <Zeno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
<104m241h9ib1i1e81a2ql7j5g2romja8t8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Tue, 13 May 2008 20:08:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Price
><nini_pad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On May 14, 10:39 am, Zeno <Z...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> The word you use "terrorists" doesn't necessarily speak to "terrorist
>>> states". That is, terrorist states have a government that creates
>>> terrorist weapons - e.g. Iran's Hezbollah.
>>
>> But Hezbollah isn't a threat to the US and to the extent it is a
>>threat to Isreal
>>it is so not because of Iran's funding but because it's recruits think
>>of Isreal as
>>a murderous, not to mention terrorist state. A belief that has some
>>weight of
>>evidence on it's side.
>
>That's nice...
>
>Did you forget that the subject was threats to the U.S. ?
You were the one who brought up Hezbollah. What? Couldn't find a
better
example?
(change Arabic number to Roman numeral to email)
|
